Yes. That's what I'm talking about. Doesn't matter what Washington wants, or how badly American nuclear forces was degraded by the Russian first counter-force strike, but if American people in Alaska and California are not ready to accept Russian government (for example, if the Russians discriminate them, don't allow to use English for any public matter and do not recognize, say, homosexual marriages) - people will fight for their God-given rights and nobody can stop them. If the Russians will try to deploy in Cuba, Canada, Mexico, Alaska, California, Texas their middle-range missiles - it will be better for the USA to start a nuclear war before it, rather then wait until inevitable first Russian attack.
How do you remember to breathe? Of all the places you mentioned, only Cuba MIGHT allow Russian missiles to be based there. And that is damned unlikely since the U.S. is far more likely to invade Cuba now then it was during the Cuban Missile Crisis and Russia can do far less to defend Cuba.
Russia is corrupt. The Belarus ruler stole his election like Trump tried to deny his loss. We can't let Ukraine fall to Russia's control. China helping Russia is troubling. So now we see who we will be fighting in WW3.
I don't say, that the Russians are going to deploy their missiles in California right now. I just wanna say, that the USA can't allow the Russians put their missiles close to the USA at any cost. If there is a choice - to start nuclear war now, or allow Russians to place their missiles in neighborhood - to start nuclear war is a better choice. The same situation is with Ukraine.
Yet it was Ukraine that reneged on the Minsk agreements. The West has proven themselves untrustworthy. You folks are unbelievable.
The problem with your statement, I won't say logic because there isn't any in it, is that the only missiles NATO has near Russia are defensive SAMs and there are already NATO countries on Russia's borders. Putin's war has nothing to do with NATO or its missiles and everything about him trying to recreate the old USSR.
After being invaded by Putin and having the Crimea stripped away by force.
Crimea had nothing to do with the Minsk agreements, they pertained only to Donbas.
My government is less than 250 years old. It's you and your traitorous ilk that claim allegiance to foreign dogs when it makes you feel better. The point remains, your utter ignorance in claiming Crimea had any relation to the Minsk agreements simply reinforces the fact you are not worth my time. Peddle your nonsense somewhere else.
My people, as in loyal patriotic Americans, who don't sell their souls to neo-nazis dogs on whim? Fair enough, we will not change our spots. You morons will as soon as you are told to support some other idiotic liberal cause.
I have no idea what odd fantasies you are on about. I care nothing of deals between Eurotrash.
We certainly know shit is specialty.
First - there is no problem to use SAM's as short- or medium-range missiles. Russians often do it in Ukraine.
alexkrainer.substack.com
