Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ultimately we are going to be at the negotiation table with Putin. Someone suggested the other day we call Putin and ask him what he needs to stop this. Chances are he's going to want a section of Ukraine. I think Ukraine is going to have to give it to them. It's probably a part where everyone sympathizes with Russia and speaks Russian. This will allow Putin to say he won and end the war.
Biden needs to make the call.
Yes. That's what I'm talking about. Doesn't matter what Washington wants, or how badly American nuclear forces was degraded by the Russian first counter-force strike, but if American people in Alaska and California are not ready to accept Russian government (for example, if the Russians discriminate them, don't allow to use English for any public matter and do not recognize, say, homosexual marriages) - people will fight for their God-given rights and nobody can stop them. If the Russians will try to deploy in Cuba, Canada, Mexico, Alaska, California, Texas their middle-range missiles - it will be better for the USA to start a nuclear war before it, rather then wait until inevitable first Russian attack.I doubt it you could find a hundred people split between the two states that would be willing to be ruled from Moscow. If you are talking about taking them by force, that’s a real belly-laugh. Everybody in Alaska is armed and are rugged individuals, and in California, even the gangs would fight against invaders. That’s not even considering the flood of volunteers from Idaho, Arizona and Nevada. That’s leaving the military completely out of it. There’s generally a reinforced brigade sized unit at Fort Irwin, a Division at Fort Lewis Washington and an armored Division at Fort Hood in Texas.
How do you remember to breathe? Of all the places you mentioned, only Cuba MIGHT allow Russian missiles to be based there. And that is damned unlikely since the U.S. is far more likely to invade Cuba now then it was during the Cuban Missile Crisis and Russia can do far less to defend Cuba.Yes. That's what I'm talking about. Doesn't matter what Washington wants, or how badly American nuclear forces was degraded by the Russian first counter-force strike, but if American people in Alaska and California are not ready to accept Russian government (for example, if the Russians discriminate them, don't allow to use English for any public matter and do not recognize, say, homosexual marriages) - people will fight for their God-given rights and nobody can stop them. If the Russians will try to deploy in Cuba, Canada, Mexico, Alaska, California, Texas their middle-range missiles - it will be better for the USA to start a nuclear war before it, rather then wait until inevitable first Russian attack.
Same situation is with Crymea and Donbass.
Russia is corrupt. The Belarus ruler stole his election like Trump tried to deny his loss. We can't let Ukraine fall to Russia's control. China helping Russia is troubling. So now we see who we will be fighting in WW3.Russia needs the Port to support the Black Sea Fleet. The rest of Crimea is just a money draw. Yes, the US needs to be involved along with the UN. I still think that Crimea needs to become an independent nation and lease port space to Russia AND Ukraine with UN troops patrolling the far western Crimea to keep Russia honest. Of course, the 6th fleet parked just south of there wouldn't hurt either.
I don't say, that the Russians are going to deploy their missiles in California right now. I just wanna say, that the USA can't allow the Russians put their missiles close to the USA at any cost. If there is a choice - to start nuclear war now, or allow Russians to place their missiles in neighborhood - to start nuclear war is a better choice. The same situation is with Ukraine.How do you remember to breathe? Of all the places you mentioned, only Cuba MIGHT allow Russian missiles to be based there. And that is damned unlikely since the U.S. is far more likely to invade Cuba now then it was during the Cuban Missile Crisis and Russia can do far less to defend Cuba.
Yet it was Ukraine that reneged on the Minsk agreements. The West has proven themselves untrustworthy. You folks are unbelievable.The problem is Russia never keeps its agreements unless forced to; nobody trusts them and for good reason. They need a completely new regime and govt. culture.
The problem with your statement, I won't say logic because there isn't any in it, is that the only missiles NATO has near Russia are defensive SAMs and there are already NATO countries on Russia's borders. Putin's war has nothing to do with NATO or its missiles and everything about him trying to recreate the old USSR.I don't say, that the Russians are going to deploy their missiles in California right now. I just wanna say, that the USA can't allow the Russians put their missiles close to the USA at any cost. If there is a choice - to start nuclear war now, or allow Russians to place their missiles in neighborhood - to start nuclear war is a better choice. The same situation is with Ukraine.
After being invaded by Putin and having the Crimea stripped away by force.Yet it was Ukraine that reneged on the Minsk agreements. The West has proven themselves untrustworthy. You folks are unbelievable.
Crimea had nothing to do with the Minsk agreements, they pertained only to Donbas.After being invaded by Putin and having the Crimea stripped away by force.
Yet it was Ukraine that reneged on the Minsk agreements. The West has proven themselves untrustworthy. You folks are unbelievable.
My government is less than 250 years old. It's you and your traitorous ilk that claim allegiance to foreign dogs when it makes you feel better. The point remains, your utter ignorance in claiming Crimea had any relation to the Minsk agreements simply reinforces the fact you are not worth my time. Peddle your nonsense somewhere else.Minsk II was never implemented, and that is because Russia already proved it wasn't going to withdraw no matter what. Your govt. is the one who is unbelievable, and there is a history going back to the 1500's to prove it.
My government is less than 250 years old.
2ndA has zero to fighting WWiiiRussia is corrupt. The Belarus ruler stole his election like Trump tried to deny his loss. We can't let Ukraine fall to Russia's control. China helping Russia is troubling. So now we see who we will be fighting in WW3.
Russia, China, who else? North Korea. Iran.
What if Mexico turned on us? OMG!
This is why I'm a big 2nd Amendment fan. And a liberal. Wolverines!
My people, as in loyal patriotic Americans, who don't sell their souls to neo-nazis dogs on whim? Fair enough, we will not change our spots. You morons will as soon as you are told to support some other idiotic liberal cause.Your people aren't, and leopards don't change their spots. The rest of your post is just more evidence your peoples' agreements mean nothing.
My people, as in loyal patriotic Americans, who don't sell their souls to neo-nazis dogs on whim? Fair enough, we will not change our spots. You morons will as soon as you are told to support some other idiotic liberal cause.
I have no idea what odd fantasies you are on about. I care nothing of deals between Eurotrash.lol Russians made deals with Hitler to steal Poland. Please tell us some more funny stories about soul selling n stuff. You loved Nazis.
I have no idea what odd fantasies you are on about. I care nothing of deals between Eurotrash.
We certainly know shit is specialty.We already know you don't know shit.
First - there is no problem to use SAM's as short- or medium-range missiles. Russians often do it in Ukraine.The problem with your statement, I won't say logic because there isn't any in it, is that the only missiles NATO has near Russia are defensive SAMs and there are already NATO countries on Russia's borders. Putin's war has nothing to do with NATO or its missiles and everything about him trying to recreate the old USSR.
alexkrainer.substack.com
