Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 51,701
- 15,276
- 2,180
Oh please the tax rate on the wealthy in the 50s was 90% and that was a time of great economic growth.
ROFL!
OH! Then you can show us the data from those prosperous days... when the government stripped 90% of the product of one's labor, which inherently stimulated consistent, prolonged prosperity.
Here's a clue: Such a period doesn't exist.
It demonstrates that higher tax rates for the wealthy don't result in the economic calalmity you salivate for. The tax burden for the wealthy is proportionately among the lowest in recent history. And you've already lamented about how bad things are.
Disproving your reasoning. And affirming the opposite. Lower taxes for the wealthy doesn't produce prosperity. Higher taxes for the wealthy doesn't produce calamity.