Well, I read the article and it gave me dubious feelings. Clearly, it was written by a 'hawk' who supports a hard line in relations with Iran in particular.The Atlantic, which is not a right-leaning publication, explains why Obama's deal with Iran was a joke:
"It was surely Barack Obama’s profound aversion to the use of American military power that so enfeebled his nuclear diplomacy and made his atomic accord with Iran the worst arms-control agreement since the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922."
It is less an arms-control agreement than cover for American inaction.www.theatlantic.com
Read the full article, you might learn something.
Well, I read the article and it gave me dubious feelings. Clearly, it was written by a 'hawk' who supports a hard line in relations with Iran in particular.
But then again, if not the deal, what options were on the table? Military operation against Iran's nuclear facilities?
I support the point that this deal could have opened Iran and integrated it in the world economy. It could have given so called reformators there an upper hand. The mullahs there aren't that stupid and they understand that something should be done with dire economic situation because oppression won't work endlessly.
The worst case scenario is Iran turning into China, becoming economically dependent on it, and developing its nuclear program with silent approval of the Chinese.
Biden did not look good. he was looking at notes the entire time and did not speak well. i say he should be retired an i am being nice saying that.
1. Democrat voters are no more than trained seals, bloodless automatons, who never confront, never question, simply vote as ordered.
The single and central "achievement" of the man they voted into office, twice, is the guarantee of nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, 7th century savages who have openly declared war on civilization and the desire for world wide conflagration.
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?
No Democrats voter can give a substantive answer.
2. Today..... "Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s visit to the Oval Office on Aug. 26 will prompt the Biden administration to refocus on the slow-motion Iran nuclear crisis, which is fast approaching a critical juncture.
Iran’s nuclear brinkmanship has reached dangerous proportions. Not only has Tehran violated the 2015 nuclear agreement that the U.S. withdrew from in 2018, it also has repeatedly violated its obligations under its Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Safeguards Agreement by concealing nuclear activities and restricting the access of inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Iran also has failed to address the nonproliferation concerns of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors who discovered discrepancies at three nuclear sites. If Tehran continues to stonewall the agency on these issues, the issue could be referred to the U.N. Security Council in the coming months.
In recent months, Iran also has orchestrated a steady drumbeat of proxy attacks on U.S. military advisers in Iraq, sought to kidnap an Iranian dissident in New York City, and ratcheted up covert attacks on Israeli-owned cargo ships.
Yet, the Biden administration remains publicly committed to rejoining the fundamentally flawed nuclear agreement."
Israel's Naftali Bennett indicates that Iran would be the core issue in his meeting with President Biden, their first since both took office.www.dailysignal.com
3. One more unanswered question:
Why would those who have benefitted so very greatly from Western Civilization, particularly allegedly Jewish folks, .....
Israel wants some guarantees of its security. And Iran can't be called too friendly towards them.Bennet is a dick... just like Bibi. He pesters our president and wants a war on Iran.. So have at it.. The US prefers diplomacy. Israel has been threatening Iran since 1994. They are 75% of the problem.