Barrett The Least Popular Nominee

She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

FC764A25-F39C-4702-B90A-9939FD96A393.gif
 
...But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years...
Meaningless...

Not to worry...

It's merely Guilt by Association...

Once a nominated Justice has been sworn-in, it no longer matters in the slightest.
 
Last edited:


The American Bar Association rated Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett “well qualified” ahead of the nominee’s hearings on Capitol Hill.

“The Standing committee confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament,” ABA Standing Committee Chair Randall D. Noel wrote in a Sunday letter to Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“A substantial majority of the Standing Committee determined that Judge Barrett is ‘Well Qualified,’ and a minority is of the opinion that she is “Qualified” to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States,” the letter continued. “The majority rating represents the Standing Committee’s official rating.”
Has zip to do with a popularity poll now does it?

You really aren't aware of much SupCt nomination history are you? Did ya look at the history of the ABA HISTORY on judging nominations? Probably not.. Or the history of the Senate VOTES on Sup Ct. nominees? Absolutely -- you haven't..

What were the final confirmation votes in the Senate for RBGinsberg? For Scalia? Were they POPULAR ? Or were they just "qualified and capable"???

I'm not giving you the quiz answers here.. Just go READ something other than "Raw Story"..
 
The American Bar Association rated Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett “well qualified”
Has zip to do with a popularity poll now does it?


ZIP. How appropriate a word to describe the IQ of people who take popularity polls where popularity is IRRELEVANT to a person's function, instead of concerning themselves with their qualification to do the job.
 


The American Bar Association rated Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett “well qualified” ahead of the nominee’s hearings on Capitol Hill.

“The Standing committee confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament,” ABA Standing Committee Chair Randall D. Noel wrote in a Sunday letter to Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“A substantial majority of the Standing Committee determined that Judge Barrett is ‘Well Qualified,’ and a minority is of the opinion that she is “Qualified” to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States,” the letter continued. “The majority rating represents the Standing Committee’s official rating.”
Has zip to do with a popularity poll now does it?
Only fuckwit Dimtards worry about popularity vs qualifications
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.


Waaaah!!!!!

She'll be confirmed, shitstain. Get over it
 
She will be confirmed, that's the bottom line. Its not about her, its about ramming through a judge when it fits one party's priorities, and denying a judge when it doesn't fit that Same party's priorities. That is dishonesty at its finest.
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Of course they are. All these polls take place in DemNazi land, and we know DemNazis want Judicial Political Activists on The Courts so that they will Ignore The Constitution and will make rulings based on DemNazi agendas.

The Right Choice for the Supreme Court is always a Strict Originalist who ignores politics and who does not legislate from The Bench.

But since when do DemNazis stand up for anything that is right and just? Never....they stand up for what selfish misguided agendas they have above every other thing.
 
...But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years...
Meaningless...

Not to worry...

It's merely Guilt by Association...

Once a nominated Justice has been sworn-in, it no longer matters in the slightest.
Extremist Prog women are a dead end and eventually will end up dead or very disappointed in primal ways of living.
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Oh for fuck's sake, are you this stupid to figure out why, Bozo?
It's not the nominee you dimwit, it's Trump.
You know....the never ever Trump mantra. Now go crawl back under your rock.
idiot
 
Progtards: She's the most unpopular Supreme Court pick evah!!!!!!!!!!!

Q for Progtards: What's the supreme Court? A. She's the most unpopular Supreme Court pick evah!!!!!!!!!
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Oh for fuck's sake, are you this stupid to figure out why, Bozo?
It's not the nominee you dimwit, it's Trump.
You know....the never ever Trump mantra. Now go crawl back under your rock.
idiot
Have you ever not acted like a dimwit? I read your drivel. Sorry for saying it, but it's true.
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

She isn't there to be popular. She is there to defend our Constitution, which the Judiciary Branch has utterly failed to do over the last 100 or so years.
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Oh for fuck's sake, are you this stupid to figure out why, Bozo?
It's not the nominee you dimwit, it's Trump.
You know....the never ever Trump mantra. Now go crawl back under your rock.
idiot
Have you ever not acted like a dimwit? I read your drivel. Sorry for saying it, but it's true.

Will you wet yourself when the Senate confirms?
Your thread is dimwitted
 
the Republicans are throwing the election away. FOR WHAT? An inadequate white Catholic woman?...who would not have been nominated had Ginsburg not died and went to heaven up there

we need to serious Supreme Court reform, court-packing being one of the options, my friends

to all you women out there, you should be appalled by this woman

and to the men, pretend you're a woman for a second, and imagine how appalled you are!
The Basque troll is back. You never disappoint.
 

Forum List

Back
Top