Barack Benghazi Obama: Lets make Benghazi his middle name and lets make it stick.
- Thread starter American_Jihad
- Start date
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,436
- 263,555
- 3,615
Benghazi?
Let's name him Barack Fast and Furious Obama
Let's name him Barack Fast and Furious Obama
francoHFW
Diamond Member
More total BS from dupes of Pubs and their Propaganda machine....The ATF chief in charge said neither the Bush nor Obama administrations knew about any gun walking- btw a tiny # of all the guns that strawmen bought to sell in Mexico- thanks to Pub laws.
NO warning on Bengazi, no lies, no coverup- just a pile of lies from Pubs. Issa btw is a pure lying scumbag, even worse than the rest.
I see Faux Noise is making a big deal about AP misquoting Rand Paul even after they killedimmediately. Pubs NEVER retract even their most outrageous lies and character assassination. That's why it's called propaganda and an alternate universe.
NO warning on Bengazi, no lies, no coverup- just a pile of lies from Pubs. Issa btw is a pure lying scumbag, even worse than the rest.
I see Faux Noise is making a big deal about AP misquoting Rand Paul even after they killedimmediately. Pubs NEVER retract even their most outrageous lies and character assassination. That's why it's called propaganda and an alternate universe.
francoHFW
Diamond Member
Yes, WHAT difference does all the Pubcrappe about the motives of the attackers make, until they're caught and asked the question? What Hillary said- DUH
BTW, onlookers said they told them they were protesting that STUPID RW video you people can't run away from fast enough...
BTW, onlookers said they told them they were protesting that STUPID RW video you people can't run away from fast enough...
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
- Thread starter
- #85
Last edited:
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
- Thread starter
- #86
Behind the Benghazi Cover-up
Patrick J. Buchanan
2012
...
Thus either administration higher-ups were ignorant for more than a week of what their own agents knew, and are thus manifestly incompetent, or they colluded in a cover-up and orchestrated deception.
As the facts are revealed, the weight of evidence tilts toward the latter conclusion.
Why? Because we now know there never was any protest at the Benghazi compound not against an anti-Muslim video or anything else.
And if there was no protest, who sent Carney out to blame the attack on the protest? And if there was no protest, who programmed Rice and put her on five separate Sunday talk shows to attribute the massacre to a protest that never happened?
If real-time intelligence and U.S. agents at the scene knew it was premeditated, preplanned terrorism by Sept. 12, who told Rice to deny specifically on Sept. 16 that the attack was premeditated or preplanned?
Indeed, why was Rice sent out at all? She is not in the chain of command. Why she accepted the assignment is obvious. She wants to be Hillary Clinton's successor as secretary of state. But who put her up to this? Who pushed her out front to mislead us?
The CIA's David Petraeus or Director of National Intelligence James Clapper should have been sent out to say what we knew, five days after the massacre.
As Chris Stevens reported to the secretary of state and President Obama, why was Hillary or National Security Adviser Tom Donilon not sent out to explain what had happened to Stevens and the others?
Looking back, Carney and Rice appear to have been used by their superiors.
Carney would never have gone out to speculate on his own about what happened in Benghazi. His line on Sept. 14 had to have been fed to him by the White House chief of staff, Donilon, Obama or all of them.
...
Behind the Benghazi Cover-up by Pat Buchanan on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
Patrick J. Buchanan
2012
...
Thus either administration higher-ups were ignorant for more than a week of what their own agents knew, and are thus manifestly incompetent, or they colluded in a cover-up and orchestrated deception.
As the facts are revealed, the weight of evidence tilts toward the latter conclusion.
Why? Because we now know there never was any protest at the Benghazi compound not against an anti-Muslim video or anything else.
And if there was no protest, who sent Carney out to blame the attack on the protest? And if there was no protest, who programmed Rice and put her on five separate Sunday talk shows to attribute the massacre to a protest that never happened?
If real-time intelligence and U.S. agents at the scene knew it was premeditated, preplanned terrorism by Sept. 12, who told Rice to deny specifically on Sept. 16 that the attack was premeditated or preplanned?
Indeed, why was Rice sent out at all? She is not in the chain of command. Why she accepted the assignment is obvious. She wants to be Hillary Clinton's successor as secretary of state. But who put her up to this? Who pushed her out front to mislead us?
The CIA's David Petraeus or Director of National Intelligence James Clapper should have been sent out to say what we knew, five days after the massacre.
As Chris Stevens reported to the secretary of state and President Obama, why was Hillary or National Security Adviser Tom Donilon not sent out to explain what had happened to Stevens and the others?
Looking back, Carney and Rice appear to have been used by their superiors.
Carney would never have gone out to speculate on his own about what happened in Benghazi. His line on Sept. 14 had to have been fed to him by the White House chief of staff, Donilon, Obama or all of them.
...
Behind the Benghazi Cover-up by Pat Buchanan on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent
Speaking of ******* idiots..
Your certainly one old **** who fits that bill to a tee.
Hell. Your not even worth laughing about.
Dante
I have always been here
Ben Ghazzi and his brothers Ben Gay and Ben Dover thank you AJ.
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
- Thread starter
- #89
PanteWaste watch out, uncle Ben is sneaking up behind you and it looks like he's going to stick some wild rice up yo (_o_)...
American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
- Thread starter
- #90
Agit8r
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2010
- 12,141
- 2,210
- 245
I would say that it doesn't stick because it is dried-up bullshit.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
The OP sounds a bit like back in the nineties when Newt Gingrich arrogantly proclaimed that he would never again mention Bill Clinton in a speech without also mentioning Monica Lewinsky.
How'd that work out, Newt?
lol
How'd that work out, Newt?
lol
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
When you rightwing inmates have convinced normal America that Barack Obama is a bad president,
you'll be relevant. Until then,
keep yanking it.
you'll be relevant. Until then,
keep yanking it.
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,420
- 2,180
Where do you get this 30,000 disabled crap? 30,000 were wounded. That doesn't mean they were all disabled. Most of them weren't.
Do libturds ever tell the truth about anything?
Mac1958
Diamond Member
.
Seems to me the GOP is trying to get its shit together and present a more sane approach in general. There have been a few flubs, of course, but the party does appear to be gathering some momentum in the sanity department.
So maybe it would be a good idea for them to stop this silly bullshit and concentrate on reparing their own standing and reputation with the public. Put all this energy into convincing the electorate on your ideas rather than giving the President a new middle name, one which many folks don't give a flying **** about.
Maybe stop trying to drag the other guys down, and try to bring yourselves up.
Seems to me most of the people who are pushing this are the same people who need to marginalized by the party.
.
Seems to me the GOP is trying to get its shit together and present a more sane approach in general. There have been a few flubs, of course, but the party does appear to be gathering some momentum in the sanity department.
So maybe it would be a good idea for them to stop this silly bullshit and concentrate on reparing their own standing and reputation with the public. Put all this energy into convincing the electorate on your ideas rather than giving the President a new middle name, one which many folks don't give a flying **** about.
Maybe stop trying to drag the other guys down, and try to bring yourselves up.
Seems to me most of the people who are pushing this are the same people who need to marginalized by the party.
.
Last edited:
LadyGunSlinger
Conservative Babe
- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,352
- 280
Benghazi Barack is out the door.. Between Benghazi and now the IRS, this corrupt Chicagoland THUG is toast!
LadyGunSlinger
Conservative Babe
- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,352
- 280
Benghazi Barack, FOR YOU YO~
Last edited by a moderator:
007
Charter Member
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
-
NYC burning $81K per homeless person — with nothing to show for it
- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 1
