Baltimore and Chicago about to get the same assistance Washington, DC is getting

LeftofLeft

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
29,082
Reaction score
19,824
Points
1,405
I couldn’t be happier. Baltimore and Chicago are absolute failures when it comes to violent crimes.

The democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by opposing and obstructing FREE federal efforts to remove criminal elements from cities that are unsafe. They are also on the wrong side of the effort to deport the millions of illegal aliens that the Biden administration allowed into our country.
 
I couldn’t be happier. Baltimore and Chicago are absolute failures when it comes to violent crimes.

I've been to both cities. They need a lot of intervention.

How can any city government be opposed to getting free help from the Fed in combating crime in your city unless they are either just too afraid how it might embarrass them and show them up what a better job that could be getting done, or that the crime is there because democrats WANT it there.
 
I couldn’t be happier. Baltimore and Chicago are absolute failures when it comes to violent crimes.


The libs in those towns, much like the libs in Washington DC could care less if their cars are jacked, their homes invaded or their babies raped.

They are more concerned about the rights of the criminals to pursue their "mostly legal" lives.

Sure, its not good if a set of cripz decides to molest children at a local elementary school. But most of the day, these cripz are just good family men, and they shouldn't be penalized, in the view of libs, for something that isn't even a majority of time they are up.
 
The democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by opposing and obstructing FREE federal efforts to remove criminal elements from cities that are unsafe. They are also on the wrong side of the effort to deport the millions of illegal aliens that the Biden administration allowed into our country.
The Democrats
I've been to both cities. They need a lot of intervention.

How can any city government be opposed to getting free help from the Fed in combating crime in your city unless they are either just too afraid how it might embarrass them and show them up what a better job that could be getting done, or that the crime is there because democrats WANT it there.
Democrats have been proven to sacrifice their own.
 
15th post
I don't want to ever hear anybody who supports Trump talk about states rights or small government ever again. They've proven they never really believed in these concepts.

These states have the right to stop/prevent crime in their state, they're failing.

Protecting citizens is the #1 job of our government, state or federal.
 
These states have the right to stop/prevent crime in their state, they're failing.

Protecting citizens is the #1 job of our government, state or federal.
Not according to Democrats. If you are a citizen with a job and pay taxes, back to line you go.
 
The democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by opposing and obstructing FREE federal efforts to remove criminal elements from cities that are unsafe. They are also on the wrong side of the effort to deport the millions of illegal aliens that the Biden administration allowed into our country.
This is not free, nor are they removing anything. It costs 1 million per day in DC, and it's going to cost more in Chicago. That money could go to programs that would remove the criminal element.

Yes, There’s a Crisis on the Border. And It’s Trump’s Fault.​

Instead of wasting his time on a wall, the president should fix the asylum system.

By ALAN BERSIN, NATE BRUGGEMAN and BEN ROHRBAUGH
April 05, 2019
Alan Bersin served as the commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and assistant secretary and chief diplomatic officer for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Nate Bruggeman held senior policy positions at the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection from 2009 to 2012. He is a partner in the consulting firm BorderWorks Advisers.

Ben Rohrbaugh was the director for enforcement and border security at the National Security Council from 2014 to 2016. He also served in senior positions at the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection.


Donald Trump has made border security and immigration enforcement a rallying cry of his campaign and the centerpiece of his presidency. But now, as the effects of his immigration policies have become measurable, it is clear to us—three people who have worked on the issue in previous administrations—that Trump is the worst president for border security in the last 30 years.

Despite the administration’s attempts to shift blame for the chaos, make no mistake: It is Donald Trump himself who is responsible. Through misguided policies, political stunts and a failure of leadership, the president has created the conditions that allowed the asylum problem at the border to explode into a crisis. The solution to our current border troubles lies in reforming the U.S. asylum system and immigration courts and helping Central America address its challenges—not in a “big beautiful” wall or shutting down the border. Yet effective action on these issues has been missing. And the president has now so poisoned the political well with his approach that there is little hope of meaningful congressional action until after the next election. Unless the administration changes course, the immigration crisis will only continue to worsen.

In fiscal year 2017, the last year of the Obama administration and the first of Trump’s, 303,916 migrants were arrested by the Border Patrol. This was the lowest level in more than three decades. The Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations had worked hard to tackle the problem of illegal migration through substantial increases in border security staffing, improvements in technology, innovations in strategy and improved security coordination and assistance to Mexico. Coupled with improved economic conditions in Mexico, these administrations were hugely successful in deterring and breaking the cycle of illegal crossing: Unlawful Mexican economic immigration, which had historically been the primary immigration enforcement issue at the border, dropped nearly 90 percent between 2000 and 2016.

 
Back
Top Bottom