Bailout of Chinese Exporters

Achilles

Senior Member
Dec 12, 2008
17
0
1
USA
NPR; Morning Edition, December 8, 2008 · Over the past quarter century, one trade relationship has been central to the process of economic globalization — Chinese factories exporting products, and American consumers buying them.

The current economic crisis signals a change in that relationship, and the gradual decline in China's role as factory to the world.

China has tried to decrease its reliance on export industries and, for now, the country has resorted to propping up its export sector out of fear that its collapse could lead to unemployment and social unrest.

Many of the dress shoes and sneakers that end up on sale at Sears and Family Dollar begin their journey halfway around the world under the sewing machines of the Feng Tai Footwear Company, located in Dongguan city in the southern Guangdong Province's Pearl River Delta.

Eddie Lam, Feng Tai's CEO, says this is one of the toughest times he's seen since he moved his factory here from Hong Kong nearly 30 years ago.

"All of a sudden they call us and say, hey, they want to split those shipments into three shipments instead of one big shipment," Lam says. "And then six months down the road they only take half of it, and you're stuck with them."

One bright spot in the Pearl River Delta is that most American companies there are surviving. At the Dahon bicycle factory, workers make tire rims for the company's folding bikes. The bikes' patented technology is a hit with consumers who want to save energy and storage space. The company's founder, David Hon, says he anticipated the economic changes now under way.

"Three or four years ago, when we saw the thing coming, the groundswell of everything coming, we started to do domestic marketing and sales of our product," Hon says. "And that took a couple of years, and finally took off a couple of years ago."

The problem is that now neither American nor Chinese consumers have the appetite to buy all the products the delta produces. China's industrial oversupply and America's overconsumption have become the main factors in a major global imbalance that is now undergoing a correction.

There's two ways production [can] come down. One way is the way it happened to America in the 1930s, where basically American overproduction collapsed," Pettis says. "We could have that in China — China overproduction could collapse. China may try to protect it, by exporting more, but my fear is that that creates a trade war, in which case it will have to come back to China."

Pettis points out that 80 years ago, the tables were turned — it was the U.S. that was exporting its oversupply of goods to Europe. And its efforts to protect those exports, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, led to a bruising trade war, falling foreign trade and an even harder economic landing.
 
Pettis points out that 80 years ago, the tables were turned — it was the U.S. that was exporting its oversupply of goods to Europe. And its efforts to protect those exports, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, led to a bruising trade war, falling foreign trade and an even harder economic landing.

FYI, since SO MANY OF YoU, think you know something about that Tariff Act, but don't actually know jack shit about it?


The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of June 1930 raised U.S. tariffs to historically high levels.

The original intention behind the legislation was to increase the protection afforded domestic farmers against foreign agricultural imports. Massive expansion in the agricultural production sector outside of Europe during World War I led, with the post-war recovery of European producers, to massive agricultural overproduction during the 1920s. This in turn led to declining farm prices during the second half of the decade.

During the 1928 election campaign, Republican presidential candidate Herbert Hoover pledged to help the beleaguered farmer by, among other things, raising tariff levels on agricultural products.

But once the tariff schedule revision process got started, it proved impossible to stop.

Calls for increased protection flooded in from industrial sector special interest groups, and soon a bill meant to provide relief for farmers became a means to raise tariffs in all sectors of the economy.

When the dust had settled, Congress had agreed to tariff levels that exceeded the already high rates established by the 1922 Fordney-McCumber Act and represented among the most protectionist tariffs in U.S. history.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff was more a consequence of the onset of the Great Depression than an initial cause.

But while the tariff might not have caused the Depression, it certainly did not make it any better. It provoked a storm of foreign retaliatory measures and came to stand as a symbol of the "beggar-thy-neighbor" policies (policies designed to improve one's own lot at the expense of that of others) of the 1930s.

Such policies contributed to a drastic decline in international trade. For example, U.S. imports from Europe declined from a 1929 high of $1,334 million to just $390 million in 1932, while U.S. exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932.

Overall, world trade declined by some 66% between 1929 and 1934. More generally, Smoot-Hawley did nothing to foster trust and cooperation among nations in either the political or economic realm during a perilous era in international relations.

The Smoot-Hawley tariff represents the high-water mark of U.S. protectionism in the 20th century.

Thereafter, beginning with the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, American commercial policy generally emphasized trade liberalization over protectionism. The United States generally assumed the mantle of champion of freer international trade, as evidenced by its support for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the World Trade Organization (WTO).


Additional Reading:
Barry Eichengreen. "The Political Economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff," Research in Economic History, 12 (1989), pp. 1-43.
Douglas A. Irwin. "From Smoot-Hawley to Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Changing the Course of U.S. Trade Policy in the 1930s," in Michael D. Bordo, Claudia Goldin, and Eugene N. White, Editors, The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Charles P. Kindleberger. The World in Depression, 1929-1939 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973).
Peter Temin. Lessons from the Great Depression: The Lionel Robbins Lectures for 1989 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1989).

[/QUOTE]

Now I post the above because I have read here from some of our know-nothing libertarian crowd that that:

1. FDR passed this legislation (clearly he did not)

2. It CAUSED the great depression (clearly that is impossible, too)​

The Smoot Hawely ACT is the boogieman that the internationalists like to mischaracterize as the source of all economic woes in the 1930s.

So it pleases me to show some of you how misinformed you really are about most all things economic.

Details matter, folks.

Here's some details you ought to pay attention to though.

For example, U.S. imports from Europe declined from a 1929 high of $1,334 million to just $390 million in 1932, while U.S. exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932.
See the difference between American trade THEN, and now?

1929 EXPORTS $2,341 million
1929 IMPROTS $1,334 million

We actually used to be NET EXPORTERS. In fact even AFTER the Smoot Haweley Tariff was passed we posted a positive trade balance

Now, of course we're net IMPORTERS and our economy is fibrilating because of it.

If I do NOTHING here, I hope to educate at least those of you who are educatable that TARIFFS are NOT the boogieman, and that FREE TRADE is NOT the panacea that you have been lead to believe.

FREE TRADE (as currently designed) is BANKRUPTING our economy.

It is REALLY the root source of our current economic meltdown.

The mortgage crises is but a symptom of the disease, folks.
 
Last edited:
It's obvious that China is suffering as a result of the world depression. This is a direct result of China's exposure to capitalist market cycles, both through the persistence of capitalism in Hong Kong/Macao, and as a result of efforts led by Deng Xiaoping and others to restore capitalist social relations in China proper.

By contrast, the Soviet Union, which had much less of its means of production in private hands, prospered and indeed posted record growth rates throughout the Great Depression.
 

Forum List

Back
Top