Auto tariffs could cost Canada 160,000 jobs, TD estimates

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
43,824
Reaction score
42,899
Points
3,605
Remember I stated 250k lost jobs a few months back if Trump got rid of NAFTA or car tariffs? This is what the "experts" at Canada predict. I am going on a limb and sticking to my estimations as this will go beyond just auto in regards to how companies will interpret this. It would start a rush of jobs back to America. The alt-left know this by the way and they are working overtime to try and derail Trump on behalf of their global masters.

By simply hitting Canada with a 25% tariff on cars, you will see a rush of high paying jobs back to the U.S. Guaranteed.

Auto tariffs would kill 1 out of every 5 manufacturing jobs in Ontario, TD says | CBC News


Donald Trump's threat to slap tariffs on Canadian cars and car parts could cost the country up to 160,000 jobs, especially if Canada retaliates, TD Bank warns.

In a report Monday, senior economist Brian DePratto crunched some numbers on the economic impact of a 10 per cent tariff on car parts, and a stiffer 25 per cent levy on fully assembled vehicles.

Those numbers aren't just pulled from thin air. They're the exact tariff levels the Trump administration recently implemented on aluminum and steel, and DePratto assumes a similar breakdown is a decent base-case scenario to work from, with 10 per cent on car parts, and 25 per cent on more high-value fully assembled vehicles.

His analysis also assumes that Canada would respond with some sort of tariff on U.S. cars and car parts, just as it did with metals.

Technically, nothing is written in stone and the earliest we'd likely see any vehicle tariffs would be August. But the wheels are certainly in motion for another front to soon open in the unexpected trade war between Canada and the United States. The first warning shots were fired in May when the Commerce Department began an investigation into the auto sector along national security grounds — the same justification that was made in slapping tariffs on steel, aluminum and other products.
 
I guess NFTA is responsible for the 160,000 jobs that moved to Canada.
 
I guess NFTA is responsible for the 160,000 jobs that moved to Canada.


Many of them, yes, without question. Many more than 160k though, this is just the auto sector. We have 500k employed in this industry, without a domestic car company.

Go figure.
 
Remember I stated 250k lost jobs a few months back if Trump got rid of NAFTA or car tariffs? This is what the "experts" at Canada predict. I am going on a limb and sticking to my estimations as this will go beyond just auto in regards to how companies will interpret this. It would start a rush of jobs back to America. The alt-left know this by the way and they are working overtime to try and derail Trump on behalf of their global masters.

By simply hitting Canada with a 25% tariff on cars, you will see a rush of high paying jobs back to the U.S. Guaranteed.

Auto tariffs would kill 1 out of every 5 manufacturing jobs in Ontario, TD says | CBC News


Donald Trump's threat to slap tariffs on Canadian cars and car parts could cost the country up to 160,000 jobs, especially if Canada retaliates, TD Bank warns.

In a report Monday, senior economist Brian DePratto crunched some numbers on the economic impact of a 10 per cent tariff on car parts, and a stiffer 25 per cent levy on fully assembled vehicles.

Those numbers aren't just pulled from thin air. They're the exact tariff levels the Trump administration recently implemented on aluminum and steel, and DePratto assumes a similar breakdown is a decent base-case scenario to work from, with 10 per cent on car parts, and 25 per cent on more high-value fully assembled vehicles.

His analysis also assumes that Canada would respond with some sort of tariff on U.S. cars and car parts, just as it did with metals.

Technically, nothing is written in stone and the earliest we'd likely see any vehicle tariffs would be August. But the wheels are certainly in motion for another front to soon open in the unexpected trade war between Canada and the United States. The first warning shots were fired in May when the Commerce Department began an investigation into the auto sector along national security grounds — the same justification that was made in slapping tariffs on steel, aluminum and other products.

Canada losing the jobs does not mean the US will gain them.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Remember I stated 250k lost jobs a few months back if Trump got rid of NAFTA or car tariffs? This is what the "experts" at Canada predict. I am going on a limb and sticking to my estimations as this will go beyond just auto in regards to how companies will interpret this. It would start a rush of jobs back to America. The alt-left know this by the way and they are working overtime to try and derail Trump on behalf of their global masters.

By simply hitting Canada with a 25% tariff on cars, you will see a rush of high paying jobs back to the U.S. Guaranteed.

Auto tariffs would kill 1 out of every 5 manufacturing jobs in Ontario, TD says | CBC News


Donald Trump's threat to slap tariffs on Canadian cars and car parts could cost the country up to 160,000 jobs, especially if Canada retaliates, TD Bank warns.

In a report Monday, senior economist Brian DePratto crunched some numbers on the economic impact of a 10 per cent tariff on car parts, and a stiffer 25 per cent levy on fully assembled vehicles.

Those numbers aren't just pulled from thin air. They're the exact tariff levels the Trump administration recently implemented on aluminum and steel, and DePratto assumes a similar breakdown is a decent base-case scenario to work from, with 10 per cent on car parts, and 25 per cent on more high-value fully assembled vehicles.

His analysis also assumes that Canada would respond with some sort of tariff on U.S. cars and car parts, just as it did with metals.

Technically, nothing is written in stone and the earliest we'd likely see any vehicle tariffs would be August. But the wheels are certainly in motion for another front to soon open in the unexpected trade war between Canada and the United States. The first warning shots were fired in May when the Commerce Department began an investigation into the auto sector along national security grounds — the same justification that was made in slapping tariffs on steel, aluminum and other products.

Canada losing the jobs does not mean the US will gain them.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

They will get many if not most of them. Companies want to avoid tariffs and the U.S economy is growing, especially for the Middle Class, so the market for consumption in the US will only grow.
 
Remember I stated 250k lost jobs a few months back if Trump got rid of NAFTA or car tariffs? This is what the "experts" at Canada predict. I am going on a limb and sticking to my estimations as this will go beyond just auto in regards to how companies will interpret this. It would start a rush of jobs back to America. The alt-left know this by the way and they are working overtime to try and derail Trump on behalf of their global masters.

By simply hitting Canada with a 25% tariff on cars, you will see a rush of high paying jobs back to the U.S. Guaranteed.

Auto tariffs would kill 1 out of every 5 manufacturing jobs in Ontario, TD says | CBC News


Donald Trump's threat to slap tariffs on Canadian cars and car parts could cost the country up to 160,000 jobs, especially if Canada retaliates, TD Bank warns.

In a report Monday, senior economist Brian DePratto crunched some numbers on the economic impact of a 10 per cent tariff on car parts, and a stiffer 25 per cent levy on fully assembled vehicles.

Those numbers aren't just pulled from thin air. They're the exact tariff levels the Trump administration recently implemented on aluminum and steel, and DePratto assumes a similar breakdown is a decent base-case scenario to work from, with 10 per cent on car parts, and 25 per cent on more high-value fully assembled vehicles.

His analysis also assumes that Canada would respond with some sort of tariff on U.S. cars and car parts, just as it did with metals.

Technically, nothing is written in stone and the earliest we'd likely see any vehicle tariffs would be August. But the wheels are certainly in motion for another front to soon open in the unexpected trade war between Canada and the United States. The first warning shots were fired in May when the Commerce Department began an investigation into the auto sector along national security grounds — the same justification that was made in slapping tariffs on steel, aluminum and other products.

Canada losing the jobs does not mean the US will gain them.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

They will get many if not most of them. Companies want to avoid tariffs and the U.S economy is growing, especially for the Middle Class, so the market for consumption in the US will only grow.

The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
I guess NFTA is responsible for the 160,000 jobs that moved to Canada.


Many of them, yes, without question. Many more than 160k though, this is just the auto sector. We have 500k employed in this industry, without a domestic car company.

Go figure.
wow that's a lot....I hope they just bring down the tariffs on both sides, but if not, you gotta do what you gotta do.
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Free trade is good, but it's not free trade unless both sides play...which has not been happening.
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Free trade is good, but it's not free trade unless both sides play...which has not been happening.

Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us

Yeah, a $600B trade deficit is real "beneficial" you ******* clown. I've already destroyed your backup arguments so just STFU.
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Free trade is good, but it's not free trade unless both sides play...which has not been happening.

Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

then remove the ag subsidies. the point of free trade is to reduce barriers....we need to make shit here...not in china.
 
Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us

Yeah, a $600B trade deficit is real "beneficial" you ******* clown. I've already destroyed your backup arguments so just STFU.

The trade deficit is a ******* talking point and is no more of a problem than the trade deficit you have with your grocery store is.

We have a trade deficit because we the people have freely chosen to buy things made in other countries, and socialist like you want to take that freedom away


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Free trade is good, but it's not free trade unless both sides play...which has not been happening.

Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

then remove the ag subsidies. the point of free trade is to reduce barriers....we need to make shit here...not in china.

As soon as you vote for a person willing to get rid of those subsidies, let me know


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Free trade is good, but it's not free trade unless both sides play...which has not been happening.

Oh bull shit. Nobody is crying about the 20 billion a year in Ag subsidies we use to make things “unfair”.

Free trade is agreements that are mutually beneficial to both sides...our current economy would indicate they have been beneficial to us



Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

then remove the ag subsidies. the point of free trade is to reduce barriers....we need to make shit here...not in china.
Do we? Why is that?
 
15th post
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Libertarian is EXACTLY what Canada, China and the EU are NOT. Why should American workers, families and future generations subsidize these economies?

Let them get a taste of their own medicine. All things being equal, America will win that battle, and Trump and people like myself who know how these countries operate their businesses, know this.
 
The demand will not be the same as the cost will be higher, driving down demand and the need for additional employees.

More likely it will just be a net loss of jobs which helps neither country, but will make you all gleeful.

Do you ever get off the Party line?

The Libertarian line is that free trade is good and government control is bad...and no, I never get off those two points.

Do you ever get tired of sniffing Trump’s ass?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Libertarian is EXACTLY what Canada, China and the EU are NOT. Why should American workers, families and future generations subsidize these economies?

Let them get a taste of their own medicine. All things being equal, America will win that battle, and Trump and people like myself who know how these countries operate their businesses, know this.

The only way to give them a taste of their medicine is to become like them...**** that.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Back
Top Bottom