2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,366
- 52,615
- 2,290
Hey, Clayton……..this is aSupreme Court jurisprudence showing that yes….as we keep freaking telling you, assault weapon bans are unconstitutional
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong and ignorant.Hey, Clayton……..this is aSupreme Court jurisprudence showing that yes….as we keep freaking telling you, assault weapon bans are unconstitutional
You seriously do not understand American legal jurisprudence.Wrong and ignorant.
AWBs are Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise.
There are seven states currently with AWBs – when all seven bans are invalidated by the Court, then and only then will they be rendered un-Constitutional.
We all know Clayton will continue to lie about... everything.Hey, Clayton……..this is aSupreme Court jurisprudence showing that yes….as we keep freaking telling you, assault weapon bans are unconstitutional
“In its simplest terms, the Second and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit governments from preventing ‘law abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bearWrong and ignorant.
AWBs are Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise.
There are seven states currently with AWBs – when all seven bans are invalidated by the Court, then and only then will they be rendered un-Constitutional.
“In its simplest terms, the Second and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit governments from preventing ‘law abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear
arms,'” Moore said of the Court’s conclusion in Bruen.
“The conduct regulated by this provision of the Amended Code, the right to possess, sell, or transfer illegal weapons, (which, as defined, include weapons commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes), is covered, at least in part, by the Second Amendment, and therefore that conduct is presumptively protected,” Moore wrote.
It's coming, and you know it.
voting for Dracula over Satan means you are still going to get fucked....no one should help either one get elected...Sadly, though.......if we lose in 2024 and Thomas dies or retires, it will be a leftist asshole who appoints his replacement....and it will be a Roberts court again, and they will likely reverse the 2nd Amendment rullings to this point.......and the lower courts will again feel free to ignore Heller, Miller, Macdonald, caetano, and bruen......
This is why defeating the democrat party is so important.......and why I always tell the "I'm not voting for the lesser of two evils," types that not voting for the lesser of two evils helps the greater evil win...
voting for Dracula over Satan means you are still going to get fucked....no one should help either one get elected...
voting for Dracula over Satan means you are still going to get fucked....no one should help either one get elected...
oh so corruption is ok?...and how is not voting for those you deem ok not voting?...you just sound like another die hard party person....Wrong.....when you have people who are actively working to destroy the country vs. a party that is just greedy and corrupt, if you don't vote, you are helping the ones actively trying to destroy the country........big difference....
you are talking about the 2 parties,both are national....once again you sound like a party person....Satan is a global threat, Dracula local and you can always put a stake in him...so voting for the lesser of two evils reduces the amount of evil in the system...as you work at fighting both...
Now, for the $64,000 question:Hey, Clayton……..this is aSupreme Court jurisprudence showing that yes….as we keep freaking telling you, assault weapon bans are unconstitutional
oh so corruption is ok?...and how is not voting for those you deem ok not voting?...you just sound like another die hard party person....
so its ok to have corrupt politicians?....if they are corrupt they can be doing things that are selling us all down the river,like to china.....you party people on both sides are something else....instead of working to get rid of these assholes you guys dont give a shit as long as they are from my party.....as Spock would say....fascinating.....Nope......I am trying to limit the damage the democrats do to this country....and the only way to do that right now is to replace them with republicans....the republicans are greedy and corrupt, but they are not out to cripple this country, and to help China.....
so its ok to have corrupt politicians?....if they are corrupt they can be doing things that are selling us all down the river,like to china.....you party people on both sides are something else....instead of working to get rid of these assholes you guys dont give a shit as long as they are from my party.....as Spock would say....fascinating.....
voting for corrupt assholes is keeping evil out of power?...not much of a difference....but i guess if they are from your party its ok......talk about idiots voting....Who said that? When you have a choice between evil, the democrats, and the greedy, republicans, until you can clean house, you have to keep evil out of power.
You idiots who vote only for the purest of pure hearts are why the democrats are destroying this country at a record setting pace.
When the Supreme Court strikes down a state’s AWB, rendering the bans in the other six states unenforceable, get back to us – then your thread premise will be valid.Hey, Clayton……..this is aSupreme Court jurisprudence showing that yes….as we keep freaking telling you, assault weapon bans are unconstitutional
When the Supreme Court strikes down a state’s AWB, rendering the bans in the other six states unenforceable, get back to us – then your thread premise will be valid.
Otherwise, AWBs are perfectly lawful and Constitutional, in no manner violating or infringing upon the Second Amendment.