Assange Ran Russian Election Hack From Ecuadorian Embassy

So...a thread about Assange and Wikileaks, based on intelligence gathered by a private Spanish company, commissioned by Ecuador. Several in the Trump cult shout at the top of their lungs defending their Dear Leader, despite the fact that they're the only ones talking about it. Really goes to show that they know full well what they're trying to avoid being true.
 
This is pretty silly because Assange has always been a liberal and democrat.
He picked the Ecuador embassy over the Russian embassy for that reason.
He original leaks were about illegal US military actions by Bush.
So he is no republican.
The thread likely is confused with Snowden, who is hiding out in Russia.
While someone did leak the DNC email hacks, that was to benefit Bernie Sanders by revealing the DNC conspiracy against him.
It was not to help the republicans.

Assange isn't even American, genius.
 
tin-foil-hat.gif
 

Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!

Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
Indeed.

"CNN does not explain why the WikiLeaks material was so damaging. Instead, it discreetly complains, midway through the report, that the US media documented the leaks, which CNN says included “transcripts of Clinton’s closed-door Wall Street speeches, sniping from staffers about her ‘terrible’ instincts and frustrations about overlap between business and charity, which they dubbed ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’”

In reality, WikiLeaks 2016 publications proved that the DNC had sought to rig the Democratic Party primaries against self-proclaimed “democratic socialist” Bernie Sanders, and in favour of Clinton, in contravention of its own rules. They showed that Clinton had promised multi-billionaire bankers that she would govern in their interests and support more predatory US military interventions.

Documents also established that the Clinton Foundation was a massive cash for access scheme, whereby governments, corporations and individuals would provide sums of money, in return for meetings with the Clintons and other government figures.

At no point does the CNN broadcast refute the fact that this material was newsworthy, in the public interest and true—the fundamental criteria for any genuine publishing organisation."
CNN peddles intelligence agencies’ lies against Assange
 
Obviously you are one of the many Democrats who missed it when AG Barr cleared the president.
 

Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!

Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
Indeed.

"CNN does not explain why the WikiLeaks material was so damaging. Instead, it discreetly complains, midway through the report, that the US media documented the leaks, which CNN says included “transcripts of Clinton’s closed-door Wall Street speeches, sniping from staffers about her ‘terrible’ instincts and frustrations about overlap between business and charity, which they dubbed ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’”

In reality, WikiLeaks 2016 publications proved that the DNC had sought to rig the Democratic Party primaries against self-proclaimed “democratic socialist” Bernie Sanders, and in favour of Clinton, in contravention of its own rules. They showed that Clinton had promised multi-billionaire bankers that she would govern in their interests and support more predatory US military interventions.

Documents also established that the Clinton Foundation was a massive cash for access scheme, whereby governments, corporations and individuals would provide sums of money, in return for meetings with the Clintons and other government figures.

At no point does the CNN broadcast refute the fact that this material was newsworthy, in the public interest and true—the fundamental criteria for any genuine publishing organisation."
CNN peddles intelligence agencies’ lies against Assange

That is the issue with both sides they love and hate the guy when it is convenient...

Personally Assange has been a beacon in the News World that is controlled by the select few...

Too bad he will be forever silent...
 
Enough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women


The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.

There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.

That is some silly shit right there.
The Apprentice is how most Americans know the moron

and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush

No, he sure didn't - you fucking liar.

Tell the truth for the first time in your pathetic existence, you putrid pile of shit, what did he REALLY say?
 
Obviously you are one of the many Democrats who missed it when AG Barr cleared the president.

It was Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada who cleared the President.

{

{1. Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion


As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the

collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens

of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" appears in the

Acting Attorney General's August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public

reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, cg, Brooke Group 12. Brown

Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or

theory of liability found in the US. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the

contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as

that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. See Black ?3 Law

Dictionary 321. (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain

something forbidden by law?); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 31 (1871)

(?An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ

such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object?); 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary 352}


1. Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion


As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the

collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens

of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" appears in the

Acting Attorney General's August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public

reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, cg, Brooke Group 12. Brown

Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or

theory of liability found in the US. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the

contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as

that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. See Black's Law

Dictionary 321. (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain

something forbidden by law); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 31 (1871)

(?An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ

such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object?); 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary 352


}
 
Enough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women


The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.

There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.

That is some silly shit right there.
The Apprentice is how most Americans know the moron

and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush

No, he sure didn't - you fucking liar.

Tell the truth for the first time in your pathetic existence, you putrid pile of shit, what did he REALLY say?
Hey asshole...he admitted it and BRAGGED about it
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz
Enough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women


The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.

There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.

That is some silly shit right there.
The Apprentice is how most Americans know the moron

and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush

No, he sure didn't - you fucking liar.

Tell the truth for the first time in your pathetic existence, you putrid pile of shit, what did he REALLY say?
Hey asshole...he admitted it and BRAGGED about it

Negative -
He spoke about the lengths that Gold Digging Who-ers would go to, to be near men of power and prestige.
 

Yeah, I actually agree. Assange was always a self-important law breaking womanizer.
Trump too
I don't think it's comparable, Trump has raped or groped many more women, but has gotten away with more because of his money. He has been to/hosted a lot of dubious parties, and even barged into beauty pageant contestants' dressing rooms.
 
This is pretty silly because Assange has always been a liberal and democrat.
He picked the Ecuador embassy over the Russian embassy for that reason.
He original leaks were about illegal US military actions by Bush.
So he is no republican.
The thread likely is confused with Snowden, who is hiding out in Russia.
While someone did leak the DNC email hacks, that was to benefit Bernie Sanders by revealing the DNC conspiracy against him.
It was not to help the republicans.

Assange isn't even American, genius.

What does citizenship have to do with anything?
England also has the same faction of wealthy elite.
The republican party in England it called Tory instead, but they represent the same values and agendas.
But it would pretty silly if I had used the Tory party when talking about US politics.
Assange was not doing WikiLeaks about the UK, but the US.
 

Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!

Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
Indeed.

"CNN does not explain why the WikiLeaks material was so damaging. Instead, it discreetly complains, midway through the report, that the US media documented the leaks, which CNN says included “transcripts of Clinton’s closed-door Wall Street speeches, sniping from staffers about her ‘terrible’ instincts and frustrations about overlap between business and charity, which they dubbed ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’”

In reality, WikiLeaks 2016 publications proved that the DNC had sought to rig the Democratic Party primaries against self-proclaimed “democratic socialist” Bernie Sanders, and in favour of Clinton, in contravention of its own rules. They showed that Clinton had promised multi-billionaire bankers that she would govern in their interests and support more predatory US military interventions.

Documents also established that the Clinton Foundation was a massive cash for access scheme, whereby governments, corporations and individuals would provide sums of money, in return for meetings with the Clintons and other government figures.

At no point does the CNN broadcast refute the fact that this material was newsworthy, in the public interest and true—the fundamental criteria for any genuine publishing organisation."
CNN peddles intelligence agencies’ lies against Assange

That is the issue with both sides they love and hate the guy when it is convenient...

Personally Assange has been a beacon in the News World that is controlled by the select few...

Too bad he will be forever silent...


I agree.
What Assange did not only was legal, but we need MUCH MORE revelations of true over what the wealthy elite are really doing to this country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top