Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
There is no credible evidence to support that statement. It's all smoke and mirrors.he certainly wasn't duped by foreign agents
No one said he was duped. He was working in concert with them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no credible evidence to support that statement. It's all smoke and mirrors.he certainly wasn't duped by foreign agents
No one said he was duped. He was working in concert with them
This is pretty silly because Assange has always been a liberal and democrat.
He picked the Ecuador embassy over the Russian embassy for that reason.
He original leaks were about illegal US military actions by Bush.
So he is no republican.
The thread likely is confused with Snowden, who is hiding out in Russia.
While someone did leak the DNC email hacks, that was to benefit Bernie Sanders by revealing the DNC conspiracy against him.
It was not to help the republicans.
Indeed.
Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!
Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
Indeed.
Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!
Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
"CNN does not explain why the WikiLeaks material was so damaging. Instead, it discreetly complains, midway through the report, that the US media documented the leaks, which CNN says included “transcripts of Clinton’s closed-door Wall Street speeches, sniping from staffers about her ‘terrible’ instincts and frustrations about overlap between business and charity, which they dubbed ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’”
In reality, WikiLeaks 2016 publications proved that the DNC had sought to rig the Democratic Party primaries against self-proclaimed “democratic socialist” Bernie Sanders, and in favour of Clinton, in contravention of its own rules. They showed that Clinton had promised multi-billionaire bankers that she would govern in their interests and support more predatory US military interventions.
Documents also established that the Clinton Foundation was a massive cash for access scheme, whereby governments, corporations and individuals would provide sums of money, in return for meetings with the Clintons and other government figures.
At no point does the CNN broadcast refute the fact that this material was newsworthy, in the public interest and true—the fundamental criteria for any genuine publishing organisation."
CNN peddles intelligence agencies’ lies against Assange
Of course you think not. You WELCOME Russian help for TrumpLol
Na, not really
Enough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women
The Apprentice is how most Americans know the moronEnough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women
The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.
There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.
That is some silly shit right there.
and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush
Obviously you are one of the many Democrats who missed it when AG Barr cleared the president.
Hey asshole...he admitted it and BRAGGED about itThe Apprentice is how most Americans know the moronEnough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women
The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.
There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.
That is some silly shit right there.
and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush
No, he sure didn't - you fucking liar.
Tell the truth for the first time in your pathetic existence, you putrid pile of shit, what did he REALLY say?
Hey asshole...he admitted it and BRAGGED about itThe Apprentice is how most Americans know the moronEnough to get a Reality TV idiot elected that admitted forcibly molesting women
The Reality TV Star was a small part of his resume.
There was absolutely no admission of forcible molestation.
That is some silly shit right there.
and yea he did admit that to Billy Bush
No, he sure didn't - you fucking liar.
Tell the truth for the first time in your pathetic existence, you putrid pile of shit, what did he REALLY say?
I don't think it's comparable, Trump has raped or groped many more women, but has gotten away with more because of his money. He has been to/hosted a lot of dubious parties, and even barged into beauty pageant contestants' dressing rooms.Trump too
Yeah, I actually agree. Assange was always a self-important law breaking womanizer.
This is pretty silly because Assange has always been a liberal and democrat.
He picked the Ecuador embassy over the Russian embassy for that reason.
He original leaks were about illegal US military actions by Bush.
So he is no republican.
The thread likely is confused with Snowden, who is hiding out in Russia.
While someone did leak the DNC email hacks, that was to benefit Bernie Sanders by revealing the DNC conspiracy against him.
It was not to help the republicans.
Assange isn't even American, genius.
Indeed.
Assange releasing of the DNC Emails did this country a favor to show you how your political party leaders were hell bent to nominate Hillary at any cost!
Had it been against the GOP and Trump you would be calling him a national hero...
"CNN does not explain why the WikiLeaks material was so damaging. Instead, it discreetly complains, midway through the report, that the US media documented the leaks, which CNN says included “transcripts of Clinton’s closed-door Wall Street speeches, sniping from staffers about her ‘terrible’ instincts and frustrations about overlap between business and charity, which they dubbed ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’”
In reality, WikiLeaks 2016 publications proved that the DNC had sought to rig the Democratic Party primaries against self-proclaimed “democratic socialist” Bernie Sanders, and in favour of Clinton, in contravention of its own rules. They showed that Clinton had promised multi-billionaire bankers that she would govern in their interests and support more predatory US military interventions.
Documents also established that the Clinton Foundation was a massive cash for access scheme, whereby governments, corporations and individuals would provide sums of money, in return for meetings with the Clintons and other government figures.
At no point does the CNN broadcast refute the fact that this material was newsworthy, in the public interest and true—the fundamental criteria for any genuine publishing organisation."
CNN peddles intelligence agencies’ lies against Assange
That is the issue with both sides they love and hate the guy when it is convenient...
Personally Assange has been a beacon in the News World that is controlled by the select few...
Too bad he will be forever silent...