- Banned
- #161
Why yes, I am of the "opinion" that stupidity is a negative/inferior trait.No, it isn't. It is the opinion of some people.Black inferiority is a fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why yes, I am of the "opinion" that stupidity is a negative/inferior trait.No, it isn't. It is the opinion of some people.Black inferiority is a fact.
You have no case worthy of an answer. Your shallow bellowing is hardly reflective of inrelligent discourse.Be careful of what you ask for, you just might get it. But know this...answering your rambling long posts is not one of my top priorities.. Besides, much of what you wrote has been repeated numerous times right here on USMB. it's nothing new. Its just the same old drivel that bigots always dig up and spread around the iNternet.
This Refutes what you have been saying, so you have to ignore it.
You couldn't have missed it and it's graphic.
Again:LOL, Aga!n a Put off. NO answer.JQPublic1 said:You haven't refuted anything I wrote. Stay tuned and find out why not.
White and Asian countries have much higher standards of living and can, unlike Africans, afford to immigrate without being at the top.
JQPublic1 said:That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Japan and maybe South Korea might be considered 1st world countries but most of Asia , including China,does have significant amounts of poverty.
But thats not the issue. Comparing the academic achievements of immigrants from Europe, Asia And Africa over the past decade..Black Africans are the winners.
And you don't have a clue as to when or how those IQ values were determined. Thats what gullible racist shills do ..you .look for propaganda that fits your prejudiced world view and there are plenty of propagandists out there making a living providing it for you.abu afak said:Same mistake, now definitely dishonesty.
African "Immigrants" are NOT "representative.
we Know there IQs there. Duh.
abu afak said:Many coming are the cream of the IQ Crop of a sub-continent with a 70 IQ. and which cannot even govern itself because OF that borderline retarded IQ AVERAGE. That includes the best of the lot of a few dozen: Nigerians.
abu afak said:I post the country/continent: you dishonestly try the top 1% of the rabble as "representative."
Many Nigerian immigrants come here TO go to college.
JQPublic1 said:yes...so what? The making point i'm making is that Africans are making liars out of pundits who have consistently berated the continent in every way.. ...
abu afak said:"So what" is that you are dishonestly and knowingly using Bad Sampling.
abu afak said:IQ differentials are AVERAGE for Races.
No one denies the top few percent of Blacks can get good results.
The Curves overlap
And you post only the undocumented assertions of pink society known to harbor the biggest liars and racists on earth.abu afak said:YOU Disingenuously POST ONLY the Far Right Hand part of the Black population as "Proof".
You put too much credence in charts. Show me the methodology behind those chartsabu afak said:TO WIN THIS ISSUE YOU HAVE TO SHOW BROAD POPULATIONS/AVERAGES, NOT 'A FEW GOOD MEN,' THAT THE CHARTS ALREADY TELL US ARE THERE.
YOU FAILED.
But hey, why use immigrants at all when we have much larger/more Representative Native populations?
JQPublic1 said:Why not eradicate stereotypes and falsehoods about African cognitive ability by any means necessary?..
abu afak said:Because YOUR "any means necessary" is Not a correct means. It's inaccurate.
abu afak said:"Stereotypes"/IQ Averages are TRUE.
You're using whatever you think fits your sorry agenda Your blind acceptance of unprovenabu afak said:Including your Continuous Dishonest and Wrong Bad Sampling/Cherry Picking while I use the Broader data/Fair Sample.
And why not use the more representative Broad populations of those countries?
JQPublic1 said:Because I'm using the same trick you use in your per capita analyses to denigrate the smaller population of blacks in the USA in comparisons to the larger Cauc group.. Except in this case..the good news about a smaller group is used against the larger group.
abu afak said:Yes. As I said half a doxen times above.. you're Cherry Picking, while I use fair numbers/Broad data.
Or the whole of sub-Sahara (70) or USA admixture 'Blacks (85) instead of picking and choosing and Fallaciously debating by Anecdote/exception.
JQPublic1 said:There is nothing anecdotal about the fact that
Black Africans are excelling in academia with world class proficiency thought previously to be beyond their capabilities...
Your data is not complete or comprehensive enough to be useful.abu afak said:Persistently DISHONEST/Fallacious...
You can't refute Broad data/average with the top 1% of a race.
abu afak said:Just like you can't say Whites are as good at Basketball by pointing to a FEW good players in the last two decades
nope...false equivalency.abu afak said:.
Got it now?
And the fact that White and Asian Macro Races originated with a base population/species in Africa doesn't mean Civilization was "Kick Started" By Blacks.
What a Dopey idea! !
Civilization "Kick Started" when they LEFT and formed different Races/subspecies.
JQPublic1 said:Until quite recently the average joe in any Western city would have said it's a dopey deal had someone suggested that Black African immigrants would conquer the academic crowns of achievement in the USA AND the UK?
abu afak said:Same old sampling error/LIE 10 Times in one post
My job is what ever I say it is. The top 1% of Cauc and Asian immigrants are being trounced in academic achievement by the top 1% of African immigrants.and you can't handle that.abu afak said:.
Your job (DUH), is to show average IQ, not that the top 1% of oner race does well.
And again, immigrants (ALONE) from white and Asian countries are not the credams of their countries.nope...false equivalency.
So that, ie, when Marco Polo landed in China (before any Colonialization) he found Silk, Porcelain, a Civil Service system, Astronomical records. etc.
While Africa was living just as it had when those original populations left and headed North 50,000+ years ago.
Just the top predator living in Huts with No written language, no wheel, etc.
JQPublic1 said:HOW wrong you are. Elite blacks of the same stock as those primitives of inner Africa were the innovators that invented writing In KMT and Sumeria. The same stock as those who Built the pyramids and the zigguarats.. Who carved the Sphinx and changed the course of the nile....ALL while the primitives of Europe and inner Africa hunted and gathered. .
abu afak said:Another of your always Dishonest posts and/or wrong assumptions.
Only Clowns from 'Afro-Studies' departments try the "Egyptians are Black" Nonsense. It's Not true... and you have nothing in sub-Sahara to point to... so you tried it.
not any more than all pink folks could do it. And your posts have been an exercise in futility...backed by charts having NO methodological currency .abu afak said:So to sum up:
Your WHOLE post was MORE DISHONEST BS: presenting knowingly bad sampling as 'average', or "proof" ALL sub-Saharans could do it.
`
I've jumped out of planes many times without a parachute and survived.. The mathematical formula I used to assure my success was to make sure the plane was sitting idle on a runway before i jumped. I was able to calculate the risk quickly and easily in my head.Blacks have trouble understanding and applying statistics. You can tell them that jumping out of a flying plane without a parachute is a bad idea, and they'll find one or two examples of people who survived and say "nah uh!"IOW, you still have NO answerBe careful of what you ask for, you just might get it. But know this...answering your rambling long posts is not one of my top priorities.. Besides, much of what you wrote has been repeated numerous times right here on USMB. it's nothing new. Its just the same old drivel that bigots always dig up and spread around the iNternet.
This Refutes what you have been saying, so you have to ignore it.
You couldn't have missed it and it's graphic.
Again:LOL, Aga!n a Put off. NO answer.JQPublic1 said:You haven't refuted anything I wrote. Stay tuned and find out why not.
White and Asian countries have much higher standards of living and can, unlike Africans, afford to immigrate without being at the top.Same mistake, now definitely dishonesty.JQPublic1 said:That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Japan and maybe South Korea might be considered 1st world countries but most of Asia , including China,does have significant amounts of poverty.
But thats not the issue. Comparing the academic achievements of immigrants from Europe, Asia And Africa over the past decade..Black Africans are the winners.
African "Immigrants" are NOT "representative.
we Know there IQs there. Duh.
Many coming are the cream of the IQ Crop of a sub-continent with a 70 IQ. and which cannot even govern itself because OF that borderline retarded IQ AVERAGE. That includes the best of the lot of a few dozen: Nigeria.
I post the country/continent: you dishonestly try the top 1% of the rabble as "representative."
Many Nigerian immigrants come here TO go to college."So what" is that you are dishonestly and knowingly using Bad Sampling.JQPublic1 said:yes...so what? The making point i'm making is that Africans are making liars out of pundits who have consistently berated the continent in every way.. ...
IQ differentials are AVERAGE for Races.
No one denies the top few percent of Blacks can get good results.
The Curves overlap
ie
or the more conservative (not including African Blacks who would be further to the Left)
YOU Disingenuously POST ONLY the Far Right Hand part of the Black population as "Proof".
It Is NOT Proof they are Not lower AVERAGE.
TO WIN THIS ISSUE YOU HAVE TO SHOW BROAD POPULATIONS/AVERAGES, NOT 'A FEW GOOD MEN,' THAT THE CHARTS ALREADY TELL US ARE THERE.
YOU FAILED.
But hey, why use immigrants at all when we have much larger/more Representative Native populations?Because YOUR "any means necessary" is Not a correct means. It's inaccurate.JQPublic1 said:Why not eradicate stereotypes and falsehoods about African cognitive ability by any means necessary?..
"Stereotypes"/IQ Averages are TRUE.
Including your Continuous Dishonest and Wrong Bad Sampling/Cherry Picking while I use the Broader data/Fair Sample.
And why not use the more representative Broad populations of those countries?Yes. As I said half a doxen times above.. you're Cherry Picking, while I use fair numbers/Broad data.JQPublic1 said:Because I'm using the same trick you use in your per capita analyses to denigrate the smaller population of blacks in the USA in comparisons to the larger Cauc group.. Except in this case..the good news about a smaller group is used against the larger group.
Or the whole of sub-Sahara (70) or USA admixture 'Blacks (85) instead of picking and choosing and Fallaciously debating by Anecdote/exception.Persistently DISHONEST/Fallacious...JQPublic1 said:There is nothing anecdotal about the fact that
Black Africans are excelling in academia with world class proficiency thought previously to be beyond their capabilities...
You can't refute Broad data/average with the top 1% of a race.
Just like you can't say Whites are as good at Basketball by pointing to a FEW good players in the last two decades.
Got it now?
And the fact that White and Asian Macro Races originated with a base population/species in Africa doesn't mean Civilization was "Kick Started" By Blacks.
What a Dopey idea! !
Civilization "Kick Started" when they LEFT and formed different Races/subspecies.Same old sampling error/LIE 10 Times in one post.JQPublic1 said:Until quite recently the average joe in any Western city would have said it's a dopey deal had someone suggested that Black African immigrants would conquer the academic crowns of achievement in the USA AND the UK?
Your job (DUH), is to show average IQ, not that the top 1% of oner race does well.
And again, immigrants (ALONE) from white and Asian countries are not the credams of their countries.
So that, ie, when Marco Polo landed in China (before any Colonialization) he found Silk, Porcelain, a Civil Service system, Astronomical records. etc.
While Africa was living just as it had when those original populations left and headed North 50,000+ years ago.
Just the top predator living in Huts with No written language, no wheel, etc.Another of your always Dishonest posts and/or wrong assumptions.JQPublic1 said:HOW wrong you are. Elite blacks of the same stock as those primitives of inner Africa were the innovators that invented writing In KMT and Sumeria. The same stock as those who Built the pyramids and the zigguarats.. Who carved the Sphinx and changed the course of the nile....ALL while the primitives of Europe and inner Africa hunted and gathered. .
Only Clowns from 'Afro-Studies' departments try the "Egyptians are Black" Nonsense. It's Not true... and you have nothing in sub-Sahara to point to... so you tried it.
So to sum up:
Your WHOLE post was MORE DISHONEST BS: presenting knowingly bad sampling as 'average', or "proof" ALL sub-Saharans could do it.
`
Except I was talking about a flying plane, stupid.I've jumped out of planes many times without a parachute and survived.. The mathematical formula I used to assure my success was to make sure the plane was sitting idle on a runway before i jumped. I was able to calculate the risk quickly and easily in my head.Blacks have trouble understanding and applying statistics. You can tell them that jumping out of a flying plane without a parachute is a bad idea, and they'll find one or two examples of people who survived and say "nah uh!"IOW, you still have NO answerBe careful of what you ask for, you just might get it. But know this...answering your rambling long posts is not one of my top priorities.. Besides, much of what you wrote has been repeated numerous times right here on USMB. it's nothing new. Its just the same old drivel that bigots always dig up and spread around the iNternet.
This Refutes what you have been saying, so you have to ignore it.
You couldn't have missed it and it's graphic.
Again:LOL, Aga!n a Put off. NO answer.JQPublic1 said:You haven't refuted anything I wrote. Stay tuned and find out why not.
White and Asian countries have much higher standards of living and can, unlike Africans, afford to immigrate without being at the top.Same mistake, now definitely dishonesty.JQPublic1 said:That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Japan and maybe South Korea might be considered 1st world countries but most of Asia , including China,does have significant amounts of poverty.
But thats not the issue. Comparing the academic achievements of immigrants from Europe, Asia And Africa over the past decade..Black Africans are the winners.
African "Immigrants" are NOT "representative.
we Know there IQs there. Duh.
Many coming are the cream of the IQ Crop of a sub-continent with a 70 IQ. and which cannot even govern itself because OF that borderline retarded IQ AVERAGE. That includes the best of the lot of a few dozen: Nigeria.
I post the country/continent: you dishonestly try the top 1% of the rabble as "representative."
Many Nigerian immigrants come here TO go to college."So what" is that you are dishonestly and knowingly using Bad Sampling.JQPublic1 said:yes...so what? The making point i'm making is that Africans are making liars out of pundits who have consistently berated the continent in every way.. ...
IQ differentials are AVERAGE for Races.
No one denies the top few percent of Blacks can get good results.
The Curves overlap
ie
or the more conservative (not including African Blacks who would be further to the Left)
YOU Disingenuously POST ONLY the Far Right Hand part of the Black population as "Proof".
It Is NOT Proof they are Not lower AVERAGE.
TO WIN THIS ISSUE YOU HAVE TO SHOW BROAD POPULATIONS/AVERAGES, NOT 'A FEW GOOD MEN,' THAT THE CHARTS ALREADY TELL US ARE THERE.
YOU FAILED.
But hey, why use immigrants at all when we have much larger/more Representative Native populations?Because YOUR "any means necessary" is Not a correct means. It's inaccurate.JQPublic1 said:Why not eradicate stereotypes and falsehoods about African cognitive ability by any means necessary?..
"Stereotypes"/IQ Averages are TRUE.
Including your Continuous Dishonest and Wrong Bad Sampling/Cherry Picking while I use the Broader data/Fair Sample.
And why not use the more representative Broad populations of those countries?Yes. As I said half a doxen times above.. you're Cherry Picking, while I use fair numbers/Broad data.JQPublic1 said:Because I'm using the same trick you use in your per capita analyses to denigrate the smaller population of blacks in the USA in comparisons to the larger Cauc group.. Except in this case..the good news about a smaller group is used against the larger group.
Or the whole of sub-Sahara (70) or USA admixture 'Blacks (85) instead of picking and choosing and Fallaciously debating by Anecdote/exception.Persistently DISHONEST/Fallacious...JQPublic1 said:There is nothing anecdotal about the fact that
Black Africans are excelling in academia with world class proficiency thought previously to be beyond their capabilities...
You can't refute Broad data/average with the top 1% of a race.
Just like you can't say Whites are as good at Basketball by pointing to a FEW good players in the last two decades.
Got it now?
And the fact that White and Asian Macro Races originated with a base population/species in Africa doesn't mean Civilization was "Kick Started" By Blacks.
What a Dopey idea! !
Civilization "Kick Started" when they LEFT and formed different Races/subspecies.Same old sampling error/LIE 10 Times in one post.JQPublic1 said:Until quite recently the average joe in any Western city would have said it's a dopey deal had someone suggested that Black African immigrants would conquer the academic crowns of achievement in the USA AND the UK?
Your job (DUH), is to show average IQ, not that the top 1% of oner race does well.
And again, immigrants (ALONE) from white and Asian countries are not the credams of their countries.
So that, ie, when Marco Polo landed in China (before any Colonialization) he found Silk, Porcelain, a Civil Service system, Astronomical records. etc.
While Africa was living just as it had when those original populations left and headed North 50,000+ years ago.
Just the top predator living in Huts with No written language, no wheel, etc.Another of your always Dishonest posts and/or wrong assumptions.JQPublic1 said:HOW wrong you are. Elite blacks of the same stock as those primitives of inner Africa were the innovators that invented writing In KMT and Sumeria. The same stock as those who Built the pyramids and the zigguarats.. Who carved the Sphinx and changed the course of the nile....ALL while the primitives of Europe and inner Africa hunted and gathered. .
Only Clowns from 'Afro-Studies' departments try the "Egyptians are Black" Nonsense. It's Not true... and you have nothing in sub-Sahara to point to... so you tried it.
So to sum up:
Your WHOLE post was MORE DISHONEST BS: presenting knowingly bad sampling as 'average', or "proof" ALL sub-Saharans could do it.
`
Well tecnically the planes flew at some point after I had jumped out of them. So whenever I knew one of the planes I'd jumped out of was flying overhead i could point at it and say i jumped out of that flying planeExcept I was talking about a flying plane, stupid.I've jumped out of planes many times without a parachute and survived.. The mathematical formula I used to assure my success was to make sure the plane was sitting idle on a runway before i jumped. I was able to calculate the risk quickly and easily in my head.Blacks have trouble understanding and applying statistics. You can tell them that jumping out of a flying plane without a parachute is a bad idea, and they'll find one or two examples of people who survived and say "nah uh!"IOW, you still have NO answerBe careful of what you ask for, you just might get it. But know this...answering your rambling long posts is not one of my top priorities.. Besides, much of what you wrote has been repeated numerous times right here on USMB. it's nothing new. Its just the same old drivel that bigots always dig up and spread around the iNternet.
This Refutes what you have been saying, so you have to ignore it.
You couldn't have missed it and it's graphic.
Again:LOL, Aga!n a Put off. NO answer.JQPublic1 said:You haven't refuted anything I wrote. Stay tuned and find out why not.
White and Asian countries have much higher standards of living and can, unlike Africans, afford to immigrate without being at the top.Same mistake, now definitely dishonesty.JQPublic1 said:That's a pretty big assumption on your part. Japan and maybe South Korea might be considered 1st world countries but most of Asia , including China,does have significant amounts of poverty.
But thats not the issue. Comparing the academic achievements of immigrants from Europe, Asia And Africa over the past decade..Black Africans are the winners.
African "Immigrants" are NOT "representative.
we Know there IQs there. Duh.
Many coming are the cream of the IQ Crop of a sub-continent with a 70 IQ. and which cannot even govern itself because OF that borderline retarded IQ AVERAGE. That includes the best of the lot of a few dozen: Nigeria.
I post the country/continent: you dishonestly try the top 1% of the rabble as "representative."
Many Nigerian immigrants come here TO go to college."So what" is that you are dishonestly and knowingly using Bad Sampling.JQPublic1 said:yes...so what? The making point i'm making is that Africans are making liars out of pundits who have consistently berated the continent in every way.. ...
IQ differentials are AVERAGE for Races.
No one denies the top few percent of Blacks can get good results.
The Curves overlap
ie
or the more conservative (not including African Blacks who would be further to the Left)
YOU Disingenuously POST ONLY the Far Right Hand part of the Black population as "Proof".
It Is NOT Proof they are Not lower AVERAGE.
TO WIN THIS ISSUE YOU HAVE TO SHOW BROAD POPULATIONS/AVERAGES, NOT 'A FEW GOOD MEN,' THAT THE CHARTS ALREADY TELL US ARE THERE.
YOU FAILED.
But hey, why use immigrants at all when we have much larger/more Representative Native populations?Because YOUR "any means necessary" is Not a correct means. It's inaccurate.JQPublic1 said:Why not eradicate stereotypes and falsehoods about African cognitive ability by any means necessary?..
"Stereotypes"/IQ Averages are TRUE.
Including your Continuous Dishonest and Wrong Bad Sampling/Cherry Picking while I use the Broader data/Fair Sample.
And why not use the more representative Broad populations of those countries?Yes. As I said half a doxen times above.. you're Cherry Picking, while I use fair numbers/Broad data.JQPublic1 said:Because I'm using the same trick you use in your per capita analyses to denigrate the smaller population of blacks in the USA in comparisons to the larger Cauc group.. Except in this case..the good news about a smaller group is used against the larger group.
Or the whole of sub-Sahara (70) or USA admixture 'Blacks (85) instead of picking and choosing and Fallaciously debating by Anecdote/exception.Persistently DISHONEST/Fallacious...JQPublic1 said:There is nothing anecdotal about the fact that
Black Africans are excelling in academia with world class proficiency thought previously to be beyond their capabilities...
You can't refute Broad data/average with the top 1% of a race.
Just like you can't say Whites are as good at Basketball by pointing to a FEW good players in the last two decades.
Got it now?
And the fact that White and Asian Macro Races originated with a base population/species in Africa doesn't mean Civilization was "Kick Started" By Blacks.
What a Dopey idea! !
Civilization "Kick Started" when they LEFT and formed different Races/subspecies.Same old sampling error/LIE 10 Times in one post.JQPublic1 said:Until quite recently the average joe in any Western city would have said it's a dopey deal had someone suggested that Black African immigrants would conquer the academic crowns of achievement in the USA AND the UK?
Your job (DUH), is to show average IQ, not that the top 1% of oner race does well.
And again, immigrants (ALONE) from white and Asian countries are not the credams of their countries.
So that, ie, when Marco Polo landed in China (before any Colonialization) he found Silk, Porcelain, a Civil Service system, Astronomical records. etc.
While Africa was living just as it had when those original populations left and headed North 50,000+ years ago.
Just the top predator living in Huts with No written language, no wheel, etc.Another of your always Dishonest posts and/or wrong assumptions.JQPublic1 said:HOW wrong you are. Elite blacks of the same stock as those primitives of inner Africa were the innovators that invented writing In KMT and Sumeria. The same stock as those who Built the pyramids and the zigguarats.. Who carved the Sphinx and changed the course of the nile....ALL while the primitives of Europe and inner Africa hunted and gathered. .
Only Clowns from 'Afro-Studies' departments try the "Egyptians are Black" Nonsense. It's Not true... and you have nothing in sub-Sahara to point to... so you tried it.
So to sum up:
Your WHOLE post was MORE DISHONEST BS: presenting knowingly bad sampling as 'average', or "proof" ALL sub-Saharans could do it.
`
They're busy working?I always find it funny that people who argue that Asians are doing great are never Asians themselves
Why is that ?
So is that a confession,?Why yes, I am of the "opinion" that stupidity is a negative/inferior trait.No, it isn't. It is the opinion of some people.Black inferiority is a fact.
So every problem on this planet is the result of racism-white supremacy. OK. We agree on thatI don't deny racism
So you believe that you are superior to black men ?Black inferiority is a fact
Second, people of any race who work full time, are married, and have high school diplomas tend not to be poor, meaning that poverty is a function of one’s choice not to do these things.
and because black married couples have a lower poverty rate than white single mothers, “life decisions” are what creates poverty.
the disproportionately black population in America’s prisons say nothing about racism, because black people simply commit more crimes, and if you don’t commit a crime, you’re not going to be arrested for it because the police are not going around arresting black people for the fun of it.
Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
We beg to differ. You pink simians are a virus upon the earth.What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
I'm white, thanks for asking, dickhead, and you can shove your racism up your ass.
The problems of black Americans are not from White Americans.
We beg to differ. You pink simians are a virus upon the earth.What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
I'm white, thanks for asking, dickhead, and you can shove your racism up your ass.
The problems of black Americans are not from White Americans.
Stop lying and look in the mirror. You're pink.What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
I'm white, thanks for asking, dickhead, and you can shove your racism up your ass.
The problems of black Americans are not from White Americans.
Mark Dean is Black. Why do you ask?We beg to differ. You pink simians are a virus upon the earth.What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
I'm white, thanks for asking, dickhead, and you can shove your racism up your ass.
The problems of black Americans are not from White Americans.
Your hate and racism is noted. It makes you a racist and a moron.
Hey, what was the color of the person that invented the computer? You know, the thing you spend so much time typing on.
Hint:
Stop lying and look in the mirror. You're pink.What doesn't make any sense...that You're pink or that your race is toxic to the earth and everthing on it?Why is it that of all the races the blacks have the most problems.
From my perspective the biggest problem blacks have is pink people like you.
That doesn't make any sense.
I'm white, thanks for asking, dickhead, and you can shove your racism up your ass.
The problems of black Americans are not from White Americans.
Don't expect me to empower you with in your "white "lies.
And you pink devils and your materialistic greed is at the root of most evils that infect mankind. You are mammon incarnate.