meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,769
- 20,849
- 2,290
Well not sure, but your link says:
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
I said Count 11, (of 12) which is found on line 49.
LINE 49, not LINE 11.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well not sure, but your link says:
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
Well not sure, but your link says:post itThe dates on the indictments for the financial transactions listed go from 2006 to 2013, not 2015.
Count 11 of the Manafort indictment covers 2016 and 2017
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
Manafort was fired in June of 2016 you cum slurping liberal.Well not sure, but your link says:
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
I said Count 11, (of 12) which is found on line 49.
LINE 49, not LINE 11.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
I see, fk, I hate that. ok. so here:Well not sure, but your link says:post itThe dates on the indictments for the financial transactions listed go from 2006 to 2013, not 2015.
Count 11 of the Manafort indictment covers 2016 and 2017
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
That is item 11. Count Eleven refers to RECENT STATEMENTS made by Manafort about his work with the Podesta Group, which Mueller states are false statements.
Arguing about Indictments is silly, since they are just Mueller throwing shit to the wall to see if it sticks, which is actually THE PERFECT ANALOGY for describing what an INDICTMENT IS.
The burden of proof in a court of law is far different.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
yeah, my bad, here read it nothing about him doing anything in 2016 to 2017 accept talking to agents.Well not sure, but your link says:
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
I said Count 11, (of 12) which is found on line 49.
LINE 49, not LINE 11.
it's a nothing burger and won't go to court. wait for it.
So WTF does any of this have to to with THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN?
NADA, NOTHING, ZILCH.
I believe Mueller is being a brilliant strategist. He's indicting Mueller on financials, and waiting to see what Trump does as far as giving Manafort a pardon.
Since it would look really bad for Trump to pardon Manafort like Ford did to Nixon, giving a blanket pardon covering any and all federal crimes. At which point Mueller would counter with his cooperative agreement with the NY AG, to indict Manafort on state charges of money laundering and state tax evasion, which only Governor Andrew Cuomo could pardon, and WON'T.
Then it's back to let's make a deal, and when the collusion charges get rolled out.
yeah, my bad, here read it nothing about him doing anything in 2016 to 2017 accept talking to agents.
View attachment 157791
I see, fk, I hate that. ok. so here:Well not sure, but your link says:post itCount 11 of the Manafort indictment covers 2016 and 2017
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
That is item 11. Count Eleven refers to RECENT STATEMENTS made by Manafort about his work with the Podesta Group, which Mueller states are false statements.
Arguing about Indictments is silly, since they are just Mueller throwing shit to the wall to see if it sticks, which is actually THE PERFECT ANALOGY for describing what an INDICTMENT IS.
The burden of proof in a court of law is far different.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
View attachment 157789
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
yes it was. it is what you stated right? no business dealings in that time frame, so you are in error. as already pointed out.yeah, my bad, here read it nothing about him doing anything in 2016 to 2017 accept talking to agents.
View attachment 157791
That was count 11 of a 12 count indictment.
5 years $10,000 fine
his lawyer however is present and can stop it. He's indicted, he doesn't have to answer any more.I see, fk, I hate that. ok. so here:Well not sure, but your link says:post it
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
That is item 11. Count Eleven refers to RECENT STATEMENTS made by Manafort about his work with the Podesta Group, which Mueller states are false statements.
Arguing about Indictments is silly, since they are just Mueller throwing shit to the wall to see if it sticks, which is actually THE PERFECT ANALOGY for describing what an INDICTMENT IS.
The burden of proof in a court of law is far different.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
View attachment 157789
What Mueller is doing is try to catch Manafort in a Perjury trap by grilling him on events that are already disclosed and in writing, and forcing Manafort and Papadopoulas, to recall these by memory, and if you get the fucking date wrong, they charge you with "LYING TO A FEDERAL AGENT" or "FALSIFYING TESTIMONY" or making "FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS"
I know enough crooked prosecutors and cops to know how the game works, and MUELLER is not an HONORABLE MAN and neither are the people he hired to work with him.
The fucking shit going down with Manafort and Mueller is this......Mueller continues to inteview Manafort and has done so numerous times, and because THEY HAVE NOTHING, what they do is try to trip you up, and cause you to make incorrect statements, especially on matters that you yourself have documented.....ONLY THEY DON'T Play Fair. You aren't allowed to look the documents up, or use notes to recall on what dates you did what. You have to verbally tell them what you recall by memory.
Notice how this fucking Troll completely ignores two things.yeah, my bad, here read it nothing about him doing anything in 2016 to 2017 accept talking to agents.
View attachment 157791
That was count 11 of a 12 count indictment.
5 years $10,000 fine
Notice how this fucking Troll completely ignores two things.
All the things Mueller is investigating are already disclosed and were documented...so he is engaging in entrapment by forcing the defendent to verbally recall documented events by memory which one can easily be tripped up,.
Actually it says to 2016. But the Right never let facts get in the way of a "good" lie.The dates on the indictments for the financial transactions listed go from 2006 to 2013, not 2015.
his lawyer however is present and can stop it. He's indicted, he doesn't have to answer any more.I see, fk, I hate that. ok. so here:Well not sure, but your link says:https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
That is item 11. Count Eleven refers to RECENT STATEMENTS made by Manafort about his work with the Podesta Group, which Mueller states are false statements.
Arguing about Indictments is silly, since they are just Mueller throwing shit to the wall to see if it sticks, which is actually THE PERFECT ANALOGY for describing what an INDICTMENT IS.
The burden of proof in a court of law is far different.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.
View attachment 157789
What Mueller is doing is try to catch Manafort in a Perjury trap by grilling him on events that are already disclosed and in writing, and forcing Manafort and Papadopoulas, to recall these by memory, and if you get the fucking date wrong, they charge you with "LYING TO A FEDERAL AGENT" or "FALSIFYING TESTIMONY" or making "FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS"
I know enough crooked prosecutors and cops to know how the game works, and MUELLER is not an HONORABLE MAN and neither are the people he hired to work with him.
Hilarious you depict Mueller like that. He’s one of the most competent public servants ever.Well not sure, but your link says:post itThe dates on the indictments for the financial transactions listed go from 2006 to 2013, not 2015.
Count 11 of the Manafort indictment covers 2016 and 2017
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
It's a PDF, I can't copy and paste
Look for charge 11, line 49
View attachment 157783
show me where it states 2016 to 2017 I'll wait.
That is item 11. Count Eleven refers to RECENT STATEMENTS made by Manafort about his work with the Podesta Group, which Mueller states are false statements.
Arguing about Indictments is silly, since they are just Mueller throwing shit to the wall to see if it sticks, which is actually THE PERFECT ANALOGY for describing what an INDICTMENT IS.
The burden of proof in a court of law is far different.
And not only that Mueller was fired in June of 2016
Count Eleven Cover statements made by Mueller in February 2017 when he was being interviewed, 7 months after being fired.