Zone1 As Christians How Are We Supposed to Handle Evil?

ChristisKing

Merry Christmas!! 😁
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Messages
46,464
Reaction score
41,563
Points
3,488
Location
USA
I was just thinking about this when I saw this video as this man says what I've been thinking all along and criticized on here for by mostly the left but even the right a bit,... That these people who go around celebrating the death of a man that was assassinated for simply just voicing his opinion.



I got told that Jesus wouldn't want me calling them demons and that's when I ask you all really? Really?? Isn't that how demons act? Aren't we supposed to call evil evil? Didn't Jesus Christ Himself drive away evil? Wouldn't Jesus Christ Himself be casting these evil entities out of these people?


That's where I got criticized again when I was saying that I think that we should re-examine the freedom of speech and where the line is drawn because evil like this disgusting filth coming out of people needs to be destroyed. Legally of course not by murder.


So I'm just wanting to know where I'm going wrong here because although I've prayed to be forgiven for any unknown sin here I honestly don't see where I'm going wrong. :dunno:


 
I was just thinking about this when I saw this video as this man says what I've been thinking all along and criticized on here for by mostly the left but even the right a bit,... That these people who go around celebrating the death of a man that was assassinated for simply just voicing his opinion.



I got told that Jesus wouldn't want me calling them demons and that's when I ask you all really? Really?? Isn't that how demons act? Aren't we supposed to call evil evil? Didn't Jesus Christ Himself drive away evil? Wouldn't Jesus Christ Himself be casting these evil entities out of these people?


That's where I got criticized again when I was saying that I think that we should re-examine the freedom of speech and where the line is drawn because evil like this disgusting filth coming out of people needs to be destroyed. Legally of course not by murder.


So I'm just wanting to know where I'm going wrong here because although I've prayed to be forgiven for any unknown sin here I honestly don't see where I'm going wrong. :dunno:

You are not going wrong. The left loves to demonize Trump, MAGA, the Republican party, whites, etc. etc. etc. But when they are demonized it's completely different. Then you are doing something Christ wouldn't want you to. Which is a lie.

They attempt to use our faith against us. But to do that they must create a false Jesus. A lovey dovey Jesus who wouldn't hurt a fly because he is so concerned over man's social evils. A Jesus who goes around picking daisies and just loving everybody. Gag.

The problem in the U.S. is that God founded this country as a refuge for Christians and Jews. The political makeup was such that Christianity could flourish and Jews protected. But Satan has been very active in destroying that political protection so that he can destroy that Christianity and Jews that are here.

And how does he destroy it? Diversity. He changes the fabric of the nation which gives him more freedom to operate.

Point being, you can expect much opposition now when being a Christian and voicing what is right. And at times you can expect death. Because we are so diverse.

My opinion.

Quantrill
 
You are not going wrong. The left loves to demonize Trump, MAGA, the Republican party, whites, etc. etc. etc. But when they are demonized it's completely different. Then you are doing something Christ wouldn't want you to. Which is a lie.

They attempt to use our faith against us. But to do that they must create a false Jesus. A lovey dovey Jesus who wouldn't hurt a fly because he is so concerned over man's social evils. A Jesus who goes around picking daisies and just loving everybody. Gag.

The problem in the U.S. is that God founded this country as a refuge for Christians and Jews. The political makeup was such that Christianity could flourish and Jews protected. But Satan has been very active in destroying that political protection so that he can destroy that Christianity and Jews that are here.

And how does he destroy it? Diversity. He changes the fabric of the nation which gives him more freedom to operate.

Point being, you can expect much opposition now when being a Christian and voicing what is right. And at times you can expect death. Because we are so diverse.

My opinion.

Quantrill
You poh whites can't live with yer status.
 
You are not going wrong. The left loves to demonize Trump, MAGA, the Republican party, whites, etc. etc. etc. But when they are demonized it's completely different. Then you are doing something Christ wouldn't want you to. Which is a lie.

They attempt to use our faith against us. But to do that they must create a false Jesus. A lovey dovey Jesus who wouldn't hurt a fly because he is so concerned over man's social evils. A Jesus who goes around picking daisies and just loving everybody. Gag.

The problem in the U.S. is that God founded this country as a refuge for Christians and Jews. The political makeup was such that Christianity could flourish and Jews protected. But Satan has been very active in destroying that political protection so that he can destroy that Christianity and Jews that are here.

And how does he destroy it? Diversity. He changes the fabric of the nation which gives him more freedom to operate.

Point being, you can expect much opposition now when being a Christian and voicing what is right. And at times you can expect death. Because we are so diverse.

My opinion.

Quantrill
The US and it's inhabit used to demonize and hated Jews because they considered that the Jews helped to kill the Christ.
 
I was just thinking about this when I saw this video as this man says what I've been thinking all along and criticized on here for by mostly the left but even the right a bit,... That these people who go around celebrating the death of a man that was assassinated for simply just voicing his opinion.



I got told that Jesus wouldn't want me calling them demons and that's when I ask you all really? Really?? Isn't that how demons act? Aren't we supposed to call evil evil? Didn't Jesus Christ Himself drive away evil? Wouldn't Jesus Christ Himself be casting these evil entities out of these people?


That's where I got criticized again when I was saying that I think that we should re-examine the freedom of speech and where the line is drawn because evil like this disgusting filth coming out of people needs to be destroyed. Legally of course not by murder.


So I'm just wanting to know where I'm going wrong here because although I've prayed to be forgiven for any unknown sin here I honestly don't see where I'm going wrong. :dunno:



Jesus once pointed out how all of the prophets were treated in the OT, all of which were oppressed and killed.

The same happened to Jesus and all of his disciples.

Jesus then said that if you follow me, the world will treat you the same.

So, the question begs, if you are not encountering this type of opposition, are you doing Christianity wrong?

The message is offensive, because truth is offensive. Truth offends YOU at some point because we are all messed up to some degree and no one likes to be told they are wrong about anything. Truth, or the word of God, is described as a two edged sword. I like to look at it this way, you can use it to do surgery on yourself to make yourself healthier, or it will be used to lop you off at the knees.

Either way there is pain involved, but one way promotes a healthier and existence in the long run and the other way you simply perish.

Interestingly, Socrates said the same thing, and that is, if there ever was a man who spoke the truth about everything, being in the public square, that person would have a short life as those around him would seek to kill him and silence him.

Ironically, that is what happened to Socrates. He was told to recant what he saw as the truth, or die. He just death.

As for handling evil, we are told to hate evil. Yes, we are commanded to hate evil, which is the beginning of all wisdom and is the fear of God.
 
That's where I got criticized again when I was saying that I think that we should re-examine the freedom of speech and where the line is drawn because evil like this disgusting filth coming out of people needs to be destroyed. Legally of course not by murder.
Freedom of speech does not need to be re-examined. What needs discussion and debate are consequences for filth speech. One of our most powerful laws is, Innocent until proven guilty. Therefore the glut of racist, Nazi, fascist, etc. must have consequences. Any government official should automatically forfeit his/her office. Media personnel are fired. Ordinary citizens face a hefty fine....based on Innocent until proven guilty. No one can call/label anyone 'racist, Nazi, fascist', etc. until proven beyond reasonable doubt according to the actual definition of that word. Instead, try 'buffoon', 'dunderhead', 'chump'.
 
Freedom of speech does not need to be re-examined. What needs discussion and debate are consequences for filth speech. One of our most powerful laws is, Innocent until proven guilty. Therefore the glut of racist, Nazi, fascist, etc. must have consequences. Any government official should automatically forfeit his/her office. Media personnel are fired. Ordinary citizens face a hefty fine....based on Innocent until proven guilty. No one can call/label anyone 'racist, Nazi, fascist', etc. until proven beyond reasonable doubt according to the actual definition of that word. Instead, try 'buffoon', 'dunderhead', 'chump'.
There are defamation laws on the books that should be used

For example, Kyle Rittenhouse was declared a white supremacist by the media and Joe Biden despite having zero evidence for that. In fact, Kyle did not even shoot a black person. As death threats started to roll in, he should have sued them all like the Covington kid did as he collected millions.
 
There are defamation laws on the books that should be used

For example, Kyle Rittenhouse was declared a white supremacist by the media and Joe Biden despite having zero evidence for that. In fact, Kyle did not even shoot a black person. As death threats started to roll in, he should have sued them all like the Covington kid did as he collected millions.
One of the problems with current defamation laws is that it is nearly impossible for any public figure to win such a suit. The Covington student was an unknown, innocent bystander.
 
One of the problems with current defamation laws is that it is nearly impossible for any public figure to win such a suit. The Covington student was an unknown, innocent bystander.
And so was Rittenhouse, which is why he should have sued.

I just think that the kid was not that bright is all.

But Trump did sue for wrongfully being called a rapist by Legacy media, and won.

I'm not lawyer, but I think there are other legal avenues to navigate more lawsuits.
 
The US and it's inhabit used to demonize and hated Jews because they considered that the Jews helped to kill the Christ.

Not the U.S. but some did and do hate the Jews. The Jews not only helped kill Christ, they had Christ killed. Thus there have been hard feelings over that.

But the Law in the U.S. protects the Christians and the Jews. And that political protection was necessary for Christianity to flourish. Same is true with God's people the Jews. God led Abraham to Canaan, the promised land. But first there was war to remove the heathen and establish the theocracy of Israel. That political protection was necessary.

In the U.S. today that protection is being eroded by the left who are the arms and voice of Satan.

Quantrill
 
Not the U.S. but some did and do hate the Jews. The Jews not only helped kill Christ, they had Christ killed. Thus there have been hard feelings over that.

But the Law in the U.S. protects the Christians and the Jews. And that political protection was necessary for Christianity to flourish. Same is true with God's people the Jews. God led Abraham to Canaan, the promised land. But first there was war to remove the heathen and establish the theocracy of Israel. That political protection was necessary.

In the U.S. today that protection is being eroded by the left who are the arms and voice of Satan.

Quantrill
The Jews formed the NAACP to organize and formally protest the abuse of Jews and other people in the US.
 
15th post
The Jews formed the NAACP to organize and formally protest the abuse of Jews and other people in the US.
Blakcs like Candace Owens and Black Muslims love Jews?

Try again.
 
The Jews formed the NAACP to organize and formally protest the abuse of Jews and other people in the US.
Were they Republican Jews? Because Republicans - black and white - started the NAACP. You think Democrats in 1909 were on the side of blacks? C'mon man.

December 31, 1898 Republican Theodore Roosevelt becomes Governor of New York; in 1900, he outlawed racial segregation in New York public schools

May 24, 1900 Republicans vote no in referendum for constitutional convention in Virginia, designed to create a new state constitution disenfranchising African-Americans

January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal to permit voting by African-Americans

October 16, 1901 President Theodore Roosevelt invites Booker T. Washington to dine at White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%

February 12, 1909 On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the NAACP

June 18, 1912 African-American Robert Church, founder of Lincoln Leagues to register black voters in Tennessee, attends 1912 Republican National Convention as delegate; eventually serves as delegate at 8 conventions

August 1, 1916 Republican presidential candidate Charles Evans Hughes, former New York Governor and U.S. Supreme Court Justice, endorses women’s suffrage constitutional amendment; he would become Secretary of State and Chief Justice

May 21, 1919 Republican House passes constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of Republicans would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no

April 18, 1920 Minnesota’s FIRST-in-the-nation anti-lynching law, promoted by African-American Republican Nellie Francis, signed by Republican Gov. Jacob Preus

August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures

January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster

June 2, 1924 Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans

October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention

December 8, 1924 Democratic presidential candidate John W. Davis argues in favor of “separate but equal”

June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden until after confirmation

June 24, 1940 Republican Party platform calls for integration of the armed forces; for the balance of his terms in office, FDR refuses to order it

October 20, 1942 60 prominent African-Americans issue Durham Manifesto, calling on southern Democrats to abolish their all-white primaries

April 3, 1944 U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Texas Democratic Party’s “whites only” primary election system

August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that “[t]he use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.”

February 18, 1946 Appointed by Republican President Calvin Coolidge, federal judge Paul McCormick ends segregation of Mexican-American children in California public schools

July 11, 1952 Republican Party platform condemns ?duplicity and insincerity” of Democrats in racial matters

September 30, 1953 Earl Warren, California’s three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education

December 8, 1953 Eisenhower administration Asst. Attorney General Lee Rankin argues for plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education

May 17, 1954 Chief Justice Earl Warren, three-term Republican Governor (CA) and Republican vice presidential nominee in 1948, wins unanimous support of Supreme Court for school desegregation in Brown v. Board of Education

November 25, 1955 Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

October 19, 1956 On campaign trail, Vice President Richard Nixon vows: “American boys and girls shall sit, side by side, at any school – public or private – with no regard paid to the color of their skin. Segregation, discrimination, and prejudice have no place in America”

November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President

September 9, 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

June 23, 1958 President Dwight Eisenhower meets with Martin Luther King and other African-American leaders to discuss plans to advance civil rights

February 4, 1959 President Eisenhower informs Republican leaders of his plan to introduce 1960 Civil Rights Act, despite staunch opposition from many Democrats

May 6, 1960 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

July 27, 1960 At Republican National Convention, Vice President and eventual presidential nominee Richard Nixon insists on strong civil rights plank in platform

May 2, 1963 Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

June 1, 1963 Democrat Governor George Wallace announces defiance of court order issued by Republican federal judge Frank Johnson to integrate University of Alabama

September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School

June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate

June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirkson, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed.

June 20, 1964 The Chicago Defender, renowned African-American newspaper, praises Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) for leading passage of 1964 Civil Rights Act

March 7, 1965 Police under the command of Democrat Governor George Wallace attack African-Americans demonstrating for voting rights in Selma, AL

March 21, 1965 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson authorizes Martin Luther King’s protest march from Selma to Montgomery, overruling Democrat Governor George Wallace

August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose

August 6, 1965 Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

July 8, 1970 In special message to Congress, President Richard Nixon calls for reversal of policy of forced termination of Native American rights and benefits

September 17, 1971 Former Ku Klux Klan member and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black (D-AL) retires from U.S. Supreme Court; appointed by FDR in 1937, he had defended Klansmen for racial murders

February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII

September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs

June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR

November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation

August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

April 26, 1999 Legislation authored by U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI) awarding Congressional Gold Medal to civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks is transmitted to President

January 25, 2001 U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee declares school choice to be “Educational Emancipation”

March 19, 2003 Republican U.S. Representatives of Hispanic and Portuguese descent form Congressional Hispanic Conference

May 23, 2003 U.S. Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduces bill to establish National Museum of African American History and Culture
 
Back
Top Bottom