As an intellectual exercise I posit the following question.

[berg80]

The WSJ is out with an interesting article on a letter from trump to Epstein for the latter's birthday. It speaks vaguely of a secret they share. The article says the letter is part of documents reviewed by the DoJ. The thing is, if there are incriminating documents in the file implicating trump does anyone really think they haven't been destroyed at trump's direction? Does anyone think Bondi would preserve the evidence if trump told her not to?

 

[Seymour Flops]

The thing is, if there are incriminating documents in the file implicating trump does anyone really think they haven't been destroyed at trump's direction?

No.

Nor incrinating info on anyone Team Autopen wanted to protect.

Does anyone think Bondi would preserve the evidence if trump told her not to?

No.

Nor would anyone in the Autopen Administration hesitate to release such evidence against Trump, if it existed.

Therefore, there is no previously unreleased evidence against trump in the epstein file.

You are correct.

So is this just a "politics sux" thread?

 

[berg80]

Dotard has instructed Pam to release the transcripts from the Epstein grand jury. Who cares? Where is the file?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Dotard has instructed Pam to release the transcripts from the Epstein grand jury. Who cares? Where is the file?

Why does that matter, if you believe it has been purged?

 

[berg80]

Dotard has instructed Pam to release the transcripts from the Epstein grand jury. Who cares? Where is the file?

Will the minions be appeased? Stay tuned.

 

[hadit]

Trump, facing MAGA uproar over Epstein files, tries to shift blame elsewhere​

Why unsealing Epstein grand jury records could be a long process

Facing uproar among his MAGA base over the Jeffrey Epstein files, President Donald Trump is trying to deflect blame to others.

abcnews.go.com

For the sake of discussion let's say trump is waste deep in the Epstein scandal. Let's say evidence emerges he is withholding the files because he is implicated in a sex trafficking crime.

What indication is there that his followers will care after ignoring 26 credible accusations of sexual abuse?

Get all the info out there and let's find out, shall we? Let's see who else is tangled up in the sleaze. Naturally, the only one you care about is Orange Man, but most of us don't care who it is, they need to be exposed.

 

[hadit]

Why does that matter, if you believe it has been purged?

If the transcripts don't say what they want them to say, that's exactly what they will claim was done.

 

[berg80]

Why does that matter, if you believe it has been purged?

I would think Goldman's constituents are proud to see their elected representative fight for a person's constitutional rights and against a regime trying to take them away.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Trump, facing MAGA uproar over Epstein files, tries to shift blame elsewhere​

Why unsealing Epstein grand jury records could be a long process

Facing uproar among his MAGA base over the Jeffrey Epstein files, President Donald Trump is trying to deflect blame to others.

abcnews.go.com

For the sake of discussion let's say trump is waste deep in the Epstein scandal. Let's say evidence emerges he is withholding the files because he is implicated in a sex trafficking crime.

What indication is there that his followers will care after ignoring 26 credible accusations of sexual abuse?

Where is the intellectual part?

 

[blackhawk]

I posit the following question will the OP ever seek help for their nonstop TDS?

 

[berg80]

If the transcripts don't say what they want them to say, that's exactly what they will claim was done.

I suspect those "stupid" people will not rest easy until all the info in the regime's possession is released. Then again, they may never be satisfied. Irrational people rarely are.

 

[berg80]

Where is the intellectual part?

Beyond your abilities.

 

[struth]

The WSJ is out with an interesting article on a letter from trump to Epstein for the latter's birthday. It speaks vaguely of a secret they share. The article says the letter is part of documents reviewed by the DoJ. The thing is, if there are incriminating documents in the file implicating trump does anyone really think they haven't been destroyed at trump's direction? Does anyone think Bondi would preserve the evidence if trump told her not to?

Why didn’t xiden and garland do anything with the so called evidence?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Beyond your abilities.

True, I have no control over you or your keyboard.

 

[BluesLegend]

The Dem desperation in this thread is delicious!

 

[struth]

Dotard has instructed Pam to release the transcripts from the Epstein grand jury. Who cares? Where is the file?

Got to give credit for admitting you don’t care abut what the actual evidence in the case says

 

[Mac-7]

For the sake of discussion let's say trump is waste deep in the Epstein scandal.

Or, let’s say he’s not deeply involved

Let’s say that Epstein was acquainted many wealthy men

But the majority were not riding the Epstein sex train to hell

They will all be tarred with guilt by association along with trump, who is the real target of lib outrage

 

[konradv]

When you try to gin up controversy by implying he was socializing with him on the island and publishing fake WSJ articles about him, it tends to make them care less.

Is the letter fake? Evidence?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Is the letter fake? Evidence?

By all accounts, yes. Multiple people who knew and associated with him said it didn't even sound like him.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Care4all

Got something to discuss?