During the civil right struggle, blacks sat down at lunch counters and asked to be served. They were refused.
Gays walked in to a county clerk office and asked to be served. They were refused. The situations would be similar only if the gays had sat down in the clerks office and refused to leave. The appropriate comparison between the two situations would be that Kim fulfilled the same role as the waitresses who refused to serve the blacks.
Not even a close comparison at all.
Race rights are not the same as personal gratification of 2 individuals.
The 1st is a human right and not a sin, the 2nd is sin, just like abortion is a sin.
Those who want to sin have a right to do so, as long as it does not force religious people to go along with that sin.
And no one is being 'forced to go along with sin'.
I waiting for you to start a campaign of morality against all heterosexual couples who engage in oral sex.....
.
What part of those who want to sin have a right did you miss?
Nothing in the Bible says that oral sex is a sin within marriage of a man and woman.
In some jurisdictions, oral sex is still considered to be "sodomy".
If they could, the damn fundie nutters would put cameras in our bedrooms.
Let's face it, oral sex will not make a baby. And frankly, any woman I respected I would not want wicking my weenie and then kissing me. It's dangling around, sweating and used for urination. Can any sane individual even imagine that there are people out there who do not bathe regularly or brush their teeth. People who worship sex and don't believe in God and simply believe we are nothing but animals ----- no better than a dog licking his butt.
And do you imagine that when two guys get married, that the limited various sexual acts are not made very obvious to everyone! No need for cameras! And average people who simply want to be left alone are being publically forced to say, "I am either for homosexuality or I'm a bigot! I'm okay with anything goes or I'm a ignorant prude!"
This is what I see America has become! And it WILL get worse. Multiple spouses is next. And I can now imagine child sex will becoming along. I mean in many cultures 12 is considered adult.
And again, opinions are not facts.
And again, its none of your business what consenting adults are doing together in their bedroom.
Its okay if you're an ignorant bigot and/or prude. What is NOT okay is for you to force others to behave as you CHOOSE to.
Ask yourself if I should have the right to force YOU to partake of sex acts you find disagreeable. Of course not.
Davis is welcome to her beliefs as well. But she's not welcome to force me OR you to agree with her.
MYOB
What's at issue is that as a Christian Baker, I don't want some government telling me I have to make a Bruce & Billy cake for their wedding if they come knocking at my door. As a Christian Photographer I don't want some government telling me I have to attend their "nuptials," if they request me to photograph them kissing. As a Christian bed and breakfast owner, I don't want some government telling me that these two guys are to be allowed to make out in my wedding suite when I don't even accept them as being married in God's eyes.
So, this whole issue is more about Christians being bullied into submission than it is about Christians forcing gays to do anything. There are loads of communities that fully embrace free love & homosexual activities; however, an Amish or Mennonite community isn't one of them. And frankly, I cannot imagine a homosexual couple wanting to be around people who are uncomfortable with the decisions they made.
It
was a free country. And communities should be allowed to decide their own fate without some governmental decree regarding the legalities of various behavior patterns. This isn't about color at all. It is about what one chooses to do: when, where, how, and why.