Are You Anxious?

[Billy_Kinetta]

The NYT says you are.

“If you’re a human being living in 2017 and you’re not anxious ... there’s something wrong with you.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/style/anxiety-is-the-new-depression-xanax.html?_r=0

 

[ScienceRocks]

You certainly are with all whining about government.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Being critical of broken systems does not indicate anxiety, but derision.

Are you a Xanax-eater?

 

[anotherlife]

I am anxious to find out who creates the current public anxiety.

 

[Anathema]

Very much so. I have little to no faith in humanity or any if its constructs (Government, Religion, etc...) at this point.

 

[anotherlife]

Very much so. I have little to no faith in humanity or any if its constructs (Government, Religion, etc...) at this point.

Humans will continue to cause more damage. We can faithfully believe that.

 

[Anathema]

Humans will continue to cause more damage. We can faithfully believe that.

Yep. Why so many people cannot jyst accept the tenants of Universal Morality and lead a proper life is just baffling to me.

 

[anotherlife]

Humans will continue to cause more damage. We can faithfully believe that.

Yep. Why so many people cannot jyst accept the tenants of Universal Morality and lead a proper life is just baffling to me.

Because they haven't invited enough Muslims yet and they haven't outsourced your job to China yet.

By the way, anxiety in America and England is as good a currency as hunger in Somalia.

 

[Anathema]

Because they haven't invited enough Muslims yet and they haven't outsourced your job to China yet.

It's more than that. So many people try to deny even the most basic of morals... like the right to self-defense and the proper place of women in society.

By the way, anxiety in America and England is as good a currency as hunger in Somalia.

Which is part of why we need to get out of the UN. Without American money abd support, the UN ceases to have the power, authority or money to do abything beyond making statements and unenforceable demands. 19 American soldiers don't die in Mogadishu if not for the UN abd its ass-kisser, Bill Clinton.

 

[anotherlife]

Because they haven't invited enough Muslims yet and they haven't outsourced your job to China yet.

It's more than that. So many people try to deny even the most basic of morals... like the right to self-defense and the proper place of women in society.

By the way, anxiety in America and England is as good a currency as hunger in Somalia.

Which is part of why we need to get out of the UN. Without American money abd support, the UN ceases to have the power, authority or money to do abything beyond making statements and unenforceable demands. 19 American soldiers don't die in Mogadishu if not for the UN abd its ass-kisser, Bill Clinton.

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

 

[Anathema]

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

I'm most concerned about a UN that will be given power to countermand US Law and the UZ Constitution. We have no need for the UN. The UN needs us.

The current US model for women's rights is only acceptable in countries we wabt to see fail. Somethibg closer to the Saudi model is necessary for a proper society.

 

[anotherlife]

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

I'm most concerned about a UN that will be given power to countermand US Law and the UZ Constitution. We have no need for the UN. The UN needs us.

The current US model for women's rights is only acceptable in countries we wabt to see fail. Somethibg closer to the Saudi model is necessary for a proper society.

The UN without the US forces is not much, but the rest of the countries are even smaller.

I think the ideal woman model was the non feminist version of the 1950's. You can see them in old movies. They look better and they think better too, now mostly dead. Hehe. The Arabic woman model goes too far with that burka hijab kitchen lockup thing.

 

[Anathema]

I think the ideal woman model was the non feminist version of the 1950's. You can see them in old movies. They look better and they think better too, now mostly dead. Hehe. The Arabic woman model goes too far with that burka hijab kitchen lockup thing.

Nice ideal but too many "Rosie the Riveter" leftovers from the 1940s who never gave up that mindset and truly went back to domestic life.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

I'm most concerned about a UN that will be given power to countermand US Law and the UZ Constitution.

The UN has no military, and no country would risk suicide in any move to try to make us obedient.

 

[RodISHI]

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

I'm most concerned about a UN that will be given power to countermand US Law and the UZ Constitution.

The UN has no military, and no country would risk suicide in any move to try to make us obedient.

No but there are many that sure would like to hamstring us if at all possible.

 

[anotherlife]

I think the ideal woman model was the non feminist version of the 1950's. You can see them in old movies. They look better and they think better too, now mostly dead. Hehe. The Arabic woman model goes too far with that burka hijab kitchen lockup thing.

Nice ideal but too many "Rosie the Riveter" leftovers from the 1940s who never gave up that mindset and truly went back to domestic life.

Now that de industrialization is complete, women can't have mass employment which was the basis of feminism. Women still dominate the low end service sector which survives on who can undercut who. Too bad the idea of family wages will never come back so the western woman model will remain forever and will drive wages ever lower.

 

[anotherlife]

What I am most afraid of is that the UN will be like the Leauge of Nations and gives France a world dominant power. The UN's world wide gun control initiative seems to point this way. Disgraceful. And women's place in society is ideal if follows the US model, in any enemy country that we want to lose it's population.

I'm most concerned about a UN that will be given power to countermand US Law and the UZ Constitution.

The UN has no military, and no country would risk suicide in any move to try to make us obedient.

No but there are many that sure would like to hamstring us if at all possible.

That would be Israel to begin with, I think. Imagine, a US as a nation outside the UN, and responding to assist an Israeli military request. Vietnam will be nothing compared to that disaster.

 

[hjmick]

Not even a little bit.

 

[Anathema]

No but there are many that sure would like to hamstring us if at all possible.

That's why we have nukes. To lop ghe head off any nation thst sticks its nose into our business.