Are The Democrats Running Scared Or What?

[DarkFury]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

IF you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like you to see.

I lived in Brooklyn for a few years of my life and know the layout/landscape/ and bridges well...

there's "No fooling Mother (Nature) Care4all"

I lived in Brooklyn for a few years of my life

Then you know it won't sell cheap.

 

[nuhuh]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

That's untrue New Yorkers elected her twice for a reason, she was doing a good job.

 

[Eaglewings]

Once you wrap your shot glass sized brain around the fact that you have alienated Women, Millenials, Students, Gays, Hispanics, Native Americans, Muslims, Asians, Blacks and just about everyone else, you will realize you need a good percentage of these people's votes to win. So you won't.

Well Said !!!!! Please run him, please please and bring back Sarah Palin too!

Bush won simply because he got enough hispanic votes to win Florida! haha...Think about that...38% of whites would never vote for a anti-investment and anti-education party such as yours. SO your little head hits the wall and there's to many pissed of non-whites voting against you!

Bush won because his brother was governor~

 

[BluesLegend]

We once convinced a democrat that during WWII we built a tunnel to Hawaii...so I'll just not be taking the advice of democrats.

 

[Auld Phart]

The same ones that will vote for her just because she's a woman?

No, I really don't think they are one and the same....to me, they are different groups altogether.

First off, I doubt anyone on the right would believe Hillary is a conservative, and definitely not more enough of one to switch their votes.

Second, I doubt any large number of women on the right are going to go for Hillary, or Sanders, and definitely not Biden in 2016.

so, are you saying that you think they will support trump?

PS
I didn't say Hillary was ''a Conservative'' with a capital C, I said she is more conservative than Trump is.... if you were to take, Donald, Hillary, and Bernie, and rank them as who is more conservative, it would Hillary, Donald, and least Bernie....again, imo.

sure Donald's stance on Mexicans is sort of conservative, but most, if not all of his real policies is liberal or has a liberal tinge to it.

Did you miss where I predicted Trump being gone by May?

uhhhh, yeah, I did....?

post #47

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

That's untrue New Yorkers elected her twice for a reason, she was doing a good job.

She was a good Democrat

That had to carpet bag her ass from Arkansas to get into the Senate.

 

[DarkFury]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

That's untrue New Yorkers elected her twice for a reason, she was doing a good job.

At what? What law did she write that got passed?

 

[konradv]

I think you could run the neighborhood jackass and win.

Who would have thought the Republicans had 16 of them!

 

[Vigilante]

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Are The Democrats Running Scared Or What?

Or what...

 

[Eaglewings]

SOME democrats out there are suggesting we run Mitt again so we republicans have a chance? When was the last time a democrat wanted you to have a chance?
The other strange part is they think republicans are AS stupid as democrats.

They want us to choose THEIR choice for OUR run? I'm not sure about you and you of course are free to comment BUT where do they get this idea they should CONTROL both parties and BOTH picks?

Oh it's that one country one party thinking. Communist for the younger crowd.
When you are being mugged by government and you are, the last thing you want to do is give the mugger bullets for his empty gun.

And that is the problem democrats face right now. The democrats have a pop gun {Hillary} and somebody has stolen the cork. So why are the democrats talking up Mitt? They want to set the stage so they don't get beat so badly. Because they ARE looking at a slaughter.

You see democrats you and I have a problem there. I WANT to see a slaughter and a damn big one. Pain and defeat epic in size, history making if you will.
The person your party wants may not even make Iowa, and you want me to rely on you as to what's best for me?

So all regards but NO Mitt and NO Jeb. And if that leaves you with hurt feelings? Well go flame somewhere. Put on a clown suit and act stupid, be a grammar nazi or a spelling nazi.

Who really cares what you democrats want us to think or want us to do? This IS about what WE want and what WE want to do. You democrats have a senile old woman who lies and an aging socialist and a pervert {maybe} and you want to pick for us?

Nah, we can do it. See you in Iowa.

 

[Care4all]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

Simply NOT TRUE.

She won by a wide margin, EVERY COUNTY outside of NYC, except 1, the county the republican candidate was from, I presume.

She won by a very wide margin (+70% outside of nyc), 56 of the 57 counties outside of New York City in 2006.

There's no bucking that... ALL of upstate New York supported her....

so you are dreaming on this one Vigil!

here's the link i just found on it

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf

 

[Vigilante]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

Simply NOT TRUE.

She won by a wide margin, EVERY COUNTY outside of NYC, except 1, the county the republican candidate was from, I presume.

She won by a very wide margin (+70% outside of nyc), 56 of the 57 counties outside of New York City in 2006.

There's no bucking that... ALL of upstate New York supported her....

so you are dreaming on this one Vigil!

here's the link i just found on it

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf

I stand corrected! I imagine this was WAY before we knew she was a murderer, corrupt beyond belief, a serial liar, and a mental retard!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Once you wrap your shot glass sized brain around the fact that you have alienated Women, Millenials, Students, Gays, Hispanics, Native Americans, Muslims, Asians, Blacks and just about everyone else, you will realize you need a good percentage of these people's votes to win. So you won't.

Well Said !!!!! Please run him, please please and bring back Sarah Palin too!

Bush won simply because he got enough hispanic votes to win Florida! haha...Think about that...38% of whites would never vote for a anti-investment and anti-education party such as yours. SO your little head hits the wall and there's to many pissed of non-whites voting against you!

Bush won because his brother was governor~

Who's going to help Trump or Carson in Florida? 2000 Florida was 65.8% white compared to 56.8% today....-9% drop.

23.5% in 2014 compared to 16.8% hispanic in 2014.

Believe me, it won't be easy to win as much of this group with a "tea partier" in pure percentage and it is unlikely to win anyways by outright population...Your party can't Afford to lose this state, and Ohio....Co is also needed...

Same thing, but bigger has happened in Nevada....


Census Explorer - Population Estimates Edition

 

[Care4all]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

That's untrue New Yorkers elected her twice for a reason, she was doing a good job.

At what? What law did she write that got passed?

does a law have to be written or passed to be a good, hard working Senator?

me thinks, NOT.

WE have TOO many laws already, don't cha think?

 

[Care4all]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

Simply NOT TRUE.

She won by a wide margin, EVERY COUNTY outside of NYC, except 1, the county the republican candidate was from, I presume.

She won by a very wide margin (+70% outside of nyc), 56 of the 57 counties outside of New York City in 2006.

There's no bucking that... ALL of upstate New York supported her....

so you are dreaming on this one Vigil!

here's the link i just found on it

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf

I stand corrected! I imagine this was WAY before we knew she was a murderer, corrupt beyond belief, a serial liar, and a mental retard!

nahhhhh, you guys claimed such back in the 90's with all of the Gates....

 

[Vigilante]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

Simply NOT TRUE.

She won by a wide margin, EVERY COUNTY outside of NYC, except 1, the county the republican candidate was from, I presume.

She won by a very wide margin (+70% outside of nyc), 56 of the 57 counties outside of New York City in 2006.

There's no bucking that... ALL of upstate New York supported her....

so you are dreaming on this one Vigil!

here's the link i just found on it

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf

I stand corrected! I imagine this was WAY before we knew she was a murderer, corrupt beyond belief, a serial liar, and a mental retard!

nahhhhh, you guys claimed such back in the 90's with all of the Gates....

But NOW we have a lot more ammunition about her!

 

[Care4all]

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

Simply NOT TRUE.

She won by a wide margin, EVERY COUNTY outside of NYC, except 1, the county the republican candidate was from, I presume.

She won by a very wide margin (+70% outside of nyc), 56 of the 57 counties outside of New York City in 2006.

There's no bucking that... ALL of upstate New York supported her....

so you are dreaming on this one Vigil!

here's the link i just found on it

http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2006/general/2006_ussen.pdf

I stand corrected! I imagine this was WAY before we knew she was a murderer, corrupt beyond belief, a serial liar, and a mental retard!

nahhhhh, you guys claimed such back in the 90's with all of the Gates....

But NOW we have a lot more ammunition about her!

Most all if not all of it is Bloviated Congress Committee Critters political posturing and showmanship, with no results showing any crimes or wrong doings, even after 6 separate individual investigations by the Senate and the House, and extremely evident to all but the GOP followers.... you all are 'playing politics' to the nth degree.

Just like you did in the 90's with all of your supposed 'gates'....you ought to really tell your congress critters to get a 'new game/ a new trick', this one is old, and tired, and used up....hide and watch!

If I am wrong, I will respectfully, eat the crow, I deserve.

 

[nuhuh]

Hillary is still one of the LEAST qualified candidates, on either ticket, as far as governing goes.

The closest she has come to 'governing' is as First Lady in Arkansas for 10 years, and the White House for 8.

She was 'given' her Senate seat by dint of carpetbagging, and on the 'power' of her status as outgoing First Lady.

Secretary of State was a consolation prize.

Trump won't make it past May, if he stays that long.

No more experience than President Kennedy, I suppose.

PS, she was an excellent Senator of new York and she won her reelection to the position as well, not on her Husband's coat tails.

If it wasn't for all the ******* THUGS and minorities in NYC voting for her FREE SHIT platform, she wouldn't have won as upstate beat the shit out of her...and just what did she do for N.Y.?

She did NOTHING for New York, NOTHING. And Sanders for ALL of his time has got little to nothing done as well. Hillary just collected a check like the Hillbilly she is.

That's untrue New Yorkers elected her twice for a reason, she was doing a good job.

At what? What law did she write that got passed?

• Even though her major initiative, the Clinton healthcare plan, failed (due to Republican obstruction), you cannot deny that it laid ground for what we have today, the Affordable Healthcare Act, something Clinton supports and would continue.
• She played a leading role in the development of State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which provides the much-needed state support for children whose parents cannot afford nor provide them with adequate healthcare coverage.
• She was also instrumental in the creation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act and the Foster Care Independence Act.
• Successfully fought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and asthma at the National Institute of Health (NIH).
• She spearheaded investigations into mental illness plaguing veterans of the Gulf War; we now have a term for it – Gulf War Syndrome.
• At the Department of Justice, she helped create the office on Violence Against Women.
• She was instrumental in securing over $21 billion in funding for the World Trade Center redevelopment.
• Took a leading role in the investigation of health consequences of first responders and drafted the first bill to compensate and offer the health services our first responders deserve (Clinton’s successor in the Senate, Kirsten Gillibrand, passed the bill).
• Was instrumental in working out a bi-partisan compromise to address civil liberty abuses for the renewal of the U.S. Patriot Act.
• Proposed a revival of the New Deal-era Home Owners’ Loan Corporation to help homeowners refinance their mortgages in the wake of the 2008 financial disaster.
• Was a major proponent of sensible diplomacy which brought about a ceasefire between Hamas and Israel, and brokered human rights with Burma.
• Oversaw free trade agreements with our allies such as Panama, Colombia, and South Korea.
• Was the most traveled Secretary of State to date.
• The Clinton Foundation, founded by her and her husband, has improved the living conditions for nearly 400 million people in over 180 countries through its Initiative program.