Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
"Silhouette vs the 50 States of the United States of America"
First read this: Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc.
In short, New York vs Ferber (USSC 1982) Found that an adult may not exercise a civil right if it results in the physical or psychological harm to a child. "Psychological harm" is identical to "mental injury". Gay marriage contractually-deprives children of either a mother or father for life. Such an act creates mental injury to children.
Some may disagree, but this is the point of contention. Further, if an allegation is made (I am making it today, in public) that depriving a child of either a mother or father for life as a legal-bind is "abuse"..states do not enjoy the luxury of sitting on their hands. The law is clear. It COMPELS states to investigate and get to the bottom of that claim of abuse without prejudice as to the outcome of such an investigation. Each state is compelled by my alleging of child abuse to do a thorough investigation and print a public report on the results of that detailed investigation for public viewing on "whether or not contractually-depriving a child for life of either a mother or father can be mentally abusive".
So says the law.
Then this: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg4.pdf
PUBLIC LAW 93-247 - Jan. 31, 1974
[Page 5]
Sec. 3. For purposes of this Act the term "child abuse and neglect" means the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse, negligent treatment, or maltreatment of a child under the age of eighteen by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare under circumstances which indicate that the child's health or welfare is harmed or threatened thereby, as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
[Page 6]
(b) (1) Of the sums appropriated under this Act for any fiscal year, not less than 5 per centum and not more than 20 per centum may be used by the Secretary for making grants to the States for the payment of reasonable and necessary expenses for the purpose of assisting the States in developing, strengthening, and carrying out child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment programs.
(2)In order for a State to qualify for assistance under this subsection, such State shall--
(A) have in effect a State child abuse and neglect law which shall include provisions for immunity for persons reporting instances of child abuse and neglect from prosecution, under any State or local law, arising out of such reporting;
(B) provide for the reporting of known and suspected instances of child abuse and neglect;
(C) provide that upon receipt of a report of known or suspected instances of child abuse or neglect an investigation shall be initiated promptly to substantiate the accuracy of the report, and, upon finding of abuse or neglect, immediate steps shall be taken to protect the health and welfare of the abused or neglected child, as well as that of any other child under the same care who may be in danger of abuse or neglect;
(D) demonstrate that there are in effect throughout the State, in connection with the enforcement of child abuse and neglect laws and with the reporting of suspected instances of child abuse and neglect, such administrative procedures, such personnel trained in child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment, such training procedures, such institutional and other facilities (public and private), and such related multidisciplinary programs and services as may be necessary or appropriate to assure that the State will deal effectively with child abuse and neglect cases in the State;
(E) provide for methods to preserve the confidentiality of all records in order to protect the rights of the child, his parents or guardians;
(F) provide for the cooperation of law enforcement officials, courts of competent jurisdiction, and appropriate State agencies providing human services;
(G) provide that in every case involving an abused or neglected child which results in a judicial proceeding a guardian ad litem shall be appointed to represent the child in such proceedings;
(H) provide that the aggregate of support for programs or projects related to child abuse and neglect assisted by State funds shall not be reduced below the level provided during fiscal year 1973, and set forth policies and procedures designed to assure that Federal funds made available under this Act for any fiscal year will be so used as to supplement and, to the extent practicable, increase the level of State funds which would, in the absence of Federal funds, be available for such programs and projects;
(I) provide for dissemination of information to the general public with respect to the problem of child abuse and neglect and the facilities and prevention and treatment methods available to combat instances of child abuse and neglect; and
(J) to the extent feasible; insure that parental organizations combating child abuse and neglect receive preferential treatment.
*******
Note: in (2) (G) no guardian ad litem was appointed in Obergefell to represent children's unique interests (mother/father) in the marriage contract.
First read this: Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc.
In short, New York vs Ferber (USSC 1982) Found that an adult may not exercise a civil right if it results in the physical or psychological harm to a child. "Psychological harm" is identical to "mental injury". Gay marriage contractually-deprives children of either a mother or father for life. Such an act creates mental injury to children.
Some may disagree, but this is the point of contention. Further, if an allegation is made (I am making it today, in public) that depriving a child of either a mother or father for life as a legal-bind is "abuse"..states do not enjoy the luxury of sitting on their hands. The law is clear. It COMPELS states to investigate and get to the bottom of that claim of abuse without prejudice as to the outcome of such an investigation. Each state is compelled by my alleging of child abuse to do a thorough investigation and print a public report on the results of that detailed investigation for public viewing on "whether or not contractually-depriving a child for life of either a mother or father can be mentally abusive".
So says the law.
Then this: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg4.pdf
PUBLIC LAW 93-247 - Jan. 31, 1974
[Page 5]
Sec. 3. For purposes of this Act the term "child abuse and neglect" means the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse, negligent treatment, or maltreatment of a child under the age of eighteen by a person who is responsible for the child's welfare under circumstances which indicate that the child's health or welfare is harmed or threatened thereby, as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
[Page 6]
(b) (1) Of the sums appropriated under this Act for any fiscal year, not less than 5 per centum and not more than 20 per centum may be used by the Secretary for making grants to the States for the payment of reasonable and necessary expenses for the purpose of assisting the States in developing, strengthening, and carrying out child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment programs.
(2)In order for a State to qualify for assistance under this subsection, such State shall--
(A) have in effect a State child abuse and neglect law which shall include provisions for immunity for persons reporting instances of child abuse and neglect from prosecution, under any State or local law, arising out of such reporting;
(B) provide for the reporting of known and suspected instances of child abuse and neglect;
(C) provide that upon receipt of a report of known or suspected instances of child abuse or neglect an investigation shall be initiated promptly to substantiate the accuracy of the report, and, upon finding of abuse or neglect, immediate steps shall be taken to protect the health and welfare of the abused or neglected child, as well as that of any other child under the same care who may be in danger of abuse or neglect;
(D) demonstrate that there are in effect throughout the State, in connection with the enforcement of child abuse and neglect laws and with the reporting of suspected instances of child abuse and neglect, such administrative procedures, such personnel trained in child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment, such training procedures, such institutional and other facilities (public and private), and such related multidisciplinary programs and services as may be necessary or appropriate to assure that the State will deal effectively with child abuse and neglect cases in the State;
(E) provide for methods to preserve the confidentiality of all records in order to protect the rights of the child, his parents or guardians;
(F) provide for the cooperation of law enforcement officials, courts of competent jurisdiction, and appropriate State agencies providing human services;
(G) provide that in every case involving an abused or neglected child which results in a judicial proceeding a guardian ad litem shall be appointed to represent the child in such proceedings;
(H) provide that the aggregate of support for programs or projects related to child abuse and neglect assisted by State funds shall not be reduced below the level provided during fiscal year 1973, and set forth policies and procedures designed to assure that Federal funds made available under this Act for any fiscal year will be so used as to supplement and, to the extent practicable, increase the level of State funds which would, in the absence of Federal funds, be available for such programs and projects;
(I) provide for dissemination of information to the general public with respect to the problem of child abuse and neglect and the facilities and prevention and treatment methods available to combat instances of child abuse and neglect; and
(J) to the extent feasible; insure that parental organizations combating child abuse and neglect receive preferential treatment.
*******
Note: in (2) (G) no guardian ad litem was appointed in Obergefell to represent children's unique interests (mother/father) in the marriage contract.