Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,250
- 99,375
- 3,645
Haha, do that! How many do you think you have to post?During durrr durrr
I'll post later underwater cities from all over planet Earth from Cuba to Japan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, do that! How many do you think you have to post?During durrr durrr
I'll post later underwater cities from all over planet Earth from Cuba to Japan
Haha, do that! How many do you think you have to post?
So, 5. Nothing out of the ordinary in any of them. Nothing anachronistic.View attachment 625645
Dwarka, India
View attachment 625646
Yonaguni Monument, Japan
![]()
Pavlopetri, Greece
![]()
Atlit-Yam, Israel
![]()
Cuba
A host of complimentary sciences prove you're wrong.Nothing evolves.
A host of complimentary sciences prove you're wrong.
Seriously?So, 5. Nothing out of the ordinary in any of them. Nothing anachronistic.
Now post their depths. And ages.
Let's see if the facts support your claims that you don't want to state cearly...
Yes, seriously. What's your point? This is the science section, not the nutter improv section.Seriously?
You do that but that is not proof there was water deep enough to cover mt Everest. 8000m high from current sea level. Got that? Where did all the water go when it subsided? Post your evidence of that.During durrr durrr
I'll post later underwater cities from all over planet Earth from Cuba to Japan
You do that but that is not proof there was water deep enough to cover mt Everest. 8000m high from current sea level. Got that? Where did all the water go when it subsided? Post your evidence of that.
Yes, seriously. What's your point? This is the science section, not the nutter improv section.
Or slid out from shore. Or were built when sea level was slightly lower.Clearly, each we're build underwater by a prehistoric Walt Disney as theme parks
It’s not for certain the flood was global. But there is evidence for a global flood.So what? Your claim is a global flood. You aren't saying anything.
There is none.It’s not for certain the flood was global. But there is evidence for a global flood.
What possible benefit do you get from denying what's right in front of you?Or slid out from shore. Or were built when sea level was slightly lower.
Which is... what? I am not denying that there was once a flood somewhere, but floods recede. You are talking about rising sea levels. Those places are CURRENTLY underwater. You get that, right?What possible benefit do you get from denying what's right in front of you?
There's no geologic evidence for a global flood.There is for geologic evidence of a massive flood and it is even recorded in cuneiform tablets.
Funny how "Bible critics" take it as a dogma.There's no geologic evidence for a global flood.
Ice ages thaw very slowly over thousands of years. They don't cause a sudden deluge world wide.Funny how "Bible critics" take it as a dogma.
No geological evidence of the ice age?