Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But you just prove the point. Jews have differences of course and all don't think the same, no group does. But regardless of party they are almost unanimously loyal to Israel and both parties are committed to supporting Israel because of AIPAC and jewish donorsThe only point of the post was that Jews in the US are not some monolithic group, and despite any views you might have that differ, both the Dems and Republicans in the US view Israel's right to survival as something for which we're willing to sacrifice our remaining treasure and youth.
Neocons: the belief that we may use our military to capture natural resources, rather than trusting to free market economies, exist, but they aren't running Obama foreign policy.
Rupert Murdoch doesn't own all the media, stop being dishonest. Most of the media in America is Jewish owned or run, it is obvious information to look up. New York Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC all run by Jews.Jews control the media? You mean Jews like Rupert Murdoch?...although the idea of Jews being responsible for Islamic terrorism is considerable.
For example, Muslims are frustrated by the hedonist consumerism of the West, hedonist consumerism which is perpetuated by the media which Jews are in control of:
An Empire of Their Own How the Jews Invented Hollywood Neal Gabler 9780385265577 Amazon.com Books
The music behind Hollywood s golden age - Telegraph
Jews in Hollywood Jewish Actors Jewish Directors Jewish Producers
Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media
Jews In The American Media Hollywood
The ironic part about this is how much conservatives complain about the media as well which deconstructs culture and values.
You'd think conservatives would see what's really going on here, but nope.
In fact, liberals often try to compare Christian conservatives to radical Muslims despite how Muslims, especially Islamists, have extreme beliefs that Christians do not. The point is liberals want the right to relish in hedonist consumerism while deconstructing culture.
I mean if Islamists attacked Hollywood instead of the World Trade Center on 9/11, conservatives would probably argue that liberals got what they deserved and wouldn't advocate intervening in the Middle East at all.
CBS is a public corporation. NBC is owned by GE.Rupert Murdoch doesn't own all the media, stop being dishonest. Most of the media in America is Jewish owned or run, it is obvious information to look up. New York Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC all run by Jews.Jews control the media? You mean Jews like Rupert Murdoch?...although the idea of Jews being responsible for Islamic terrorism is considerable.
For example, Muslims are frustrated by the hedonist consumerism of the West, hedonist consumerism which is perpetuated by the media which Jews are in control of:
An Empire of Their Own How the Jews Invented Hollywood Neal Gabler 9780385265577 Amazon.com Books
The music behind Hollywood s golden age - Telegraph
Jews in Hollywood Jewish Actors Jewish Directors Jewish Producers
Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media
Jews In The American Media Hollywood
The ironic part about this is how much conservatives complain about the media as well which deconstructs culture and values.
You'd think conservatives would see what's really going on here, but nope.
In fact, liberals often try to compare Christian conservatives to radical Muslims despite how Muslims, especially Islamists, have extreme beliefs that Christians do not. The point is liberals want the right to relish in hedonist consumerism while deconstructing culture.
I mean if Islamists attacked Hollywood instead of the World Trade Center on 9/11, conservatives would probably argue that liberals got what they deserved and wouldn't advocate intervening in the Middle East at all.
Is Joel Stein, a jewish columnist, anti-semitic when he brags about how they run Hollywood?
Who runs Hollywood C mon - Los Angeles Times
It is just a fact.
AIPAC is only relevant to lobbying. My post was intended to say two things, but it seems I failed. 1. US Jews are not monolithic. Some, like Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol are avowed neoconservatives who would most likely like to see US forces in Syria, and have been openly dismissive of any Palestinian state. But, not all US Jews agree. 2. The vast majority of all Americans view the Israel Palestinian conflict in fairly broad terms that the only reason there's still any conflict is that the Pales won't abide by any peaceful resolution that acknowledges Israel exists, and opposing Israel's destruction is viewed as a vital strategic interest worth fighting over ... and THAT belief is shared by both political parties.But you just prove the point. Jews have differences of course and all don't think the same, no group does. But regardless of party they are almost unanimously loyal to Israel and both parties are committed to supporting Israel because of AIPAC and jewish donorsThe only point of the post was that Jews in the US are not some monolithic group, and despite any views you might have that differ, both the Dems and Republicans in the US view Israel's right to survival as something for which we're willing to sacrifice our remaining treasure and youth.
Neocons: the belief that we may use our military to capture natural resources, rather than trusting to free market economies, exist, but they aren't running Obama foreign policy.
CBS Corporation is majority owned by Murray Rothstein. NBC is owned by Comcast. Their CEO and Chairman is Brian Roberts, who also is the largest shareholder, is Jewish.But please tell us more how Rupert Murdoch controls all American media, lol.CBS is a public corporation. NBC is owned by GE.Rupert Murdoch doesn't own all the media, stop being dishonest. Most of the media in America is Jewish owned or run, it is obvious information to look up. New York Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC all run by Jews.Jews control the media? You mean Jews like Rupert Murdoch?...although the idea of Jews being responsible for Islamic terrorism is considerable.
For example, Muslims are frustrated by the hedonist consumerism of the West, hedonist consumerism which is perpetuated by the media which Jews are in control of:
An Empire of Their Own How the Jews Invented Hollywood Neal Gabler 9780385265577 Amazon.com Books
The music behind Hollywood s golden age - Telegraph
Jews in Hollywood Jewish Actors Jewish Directors Jewish Producers
Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media
Jews In The American Media Hollywood
The ironic part about this is how much conservatives complain about the media as well which deconstructs culture and values.
You'd think conservatives would see what's really going on here, but nope.
In fact, liberals often try to compare Christian conservatives to radical Muslims despite how Muslims, especially Islamists, have extreme beliefs that Christians do not. The point is liberals want the right to relish in hedonist consumerism while deconstructing culture.
I mean if Islamists attacked Hollywood instead of the World Trade Center on 9/11, conservatives would probably argue that liberals got what they deserved and wouldn't advocate intervening in the Middle East at all.
Is Joel Stein, a jewish columnist, anti-semitic when he brags about how they run Hollywood?
Who runs Hollywood C mon - Los Angeles Times
It is just a fact.
You just cant get it right, can you?
The funny thing is, you didn't address a single point I made about how Aipac controls us foreign policy on Israel, you were just confirming it. You just went on making the same point that all jews aren't alike. Which I never made. Obviously there are different views on how to manage the American Empire and by extension this effects whether they support left or right in Israel. It effects whether they are liberal or neoconservative. But as you said, Israel us their vital interest. However, while they have differences, they all support American aid to Israel e en as illegal settlements continue and oppose Palestinian statehood through the UN. And good look getting members of US Congress in either party overturning aid to Israel or voting to end settlements or to support Palestinian statehood without posing a risk to their next election.AIPAC is only relevant to lobbying. My post was intended to say two things, but it seems I failed. 1. US Jews are not monolithic. Some, like Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol are avowed neoconservatives who would most likely like to see US forces in Syria, and have been openly dismissive of any Palestinian state. But, not all US Jews agree. 2. The vast majority of all Americans view the Israel Palestinian conflict in fairly broad terms that the only reason there's still any conflict is that the Pales won't abide by any peaceful resolution that acknowledges Israel exists, and opposing Israel's destruction is viewed as a vital strategic interest worth fighting over ... and THAT belief is shared by both political parties.But you just prove the point. Jews have differences of course and all don't think the same, no group does. But regardless of party they are almost unanimously loyal to Israel and both parties are committed to supporting Israel because of AIPAC and jewish donorsThe only point of the post was that Jews in the US are not some monolithic group, and despite any views you might have that differ, both the Dems and Republicans in the US view Israel's right to survival as something for which we're willing to sacrifice our remaining treasure and youth.
Neocons: the belief that we may use our military to capture natural resources, rather than trusting to free market economies, exist, but they aren't running Obama foreign policy.
So, focusing on neoconservatism and Israel or even as the dominant belief behind US policy in the ME, and even less so in Europe, is missing the point.
The funny thing is, you didn't address a single point I made about how Aipac controls us foreign policy on Israel, you were just confirming it. You just went on making the same point that all jews aren't alike. Which I never made. Obviously there are different views on how to manage the American Empire and by extension this effects whether they support left or right in Israel. It effects whether they are liberal or neoconservative. But as you said, Israel us their vital interest. However, while they have differences, they all support American aid to Israel e en as illegal settlements continue and oppose Palestinian statehood through the UN. And good look getting members of US Congress in either party overturning aid to Israel or voting to end settlements or to support Palestinian statehood without posing a risk to their next election.AIPAC is only relevant to lobbying. My post was intended to say two things, but it seems I failed. 1. US Jews are not monolithic. Some, like Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol are avowed neoconservatives who would most likely like to see US forces in Syria, and have been openly dismissive of any Palestinian state. But, not all US Jews agree. 2. The vast majority of all Americans view the Israel Palestinian conflict in fairly broad terms that the only reason there's still any conflict is that the Pales won't abide by any peaceful resolution that acknowledges Israel exists, and opposing Israel's destruction is viewed as a vital strategic interest worth fighting over ... and THAT belief is shared by both political parties.But you just prove the point. Jews have differences of course and all don't think the same, no group does. But regardless of party they are almost unanimously loyal to Israel and both parties are committed to supporting Israel because of AIPAC and jewish donorsThe only point of the post was that Jews in the US are not some monolithic group, and despite any views you might have that differ, both the Dems and Republicans in the US view Israel's right to survival as something for which we're willing to sacrifice our remaining treasure and youth.
Neocons: the belief that we may use our military to capture natural resources, rather than trusting to free market economies, exist, but they aren't running Obama foreign policy.
So, focusing on neoconservatism and Israel or even as the dominant belief behind US policy in the ME, and even less so in Europe, is missing the point.
The rest of your ramble is a waste of time, just worthless pseudo-intellectual prattling with nothing of substance. Conclusion tl;dr..The funny thing is, you didn't address a single point I made about how Aipac controls us foreign policy on Israel, you were just confirming it. You just went on making the same point that all jews aren't alike. Which I never made. Obviously there are different views on how to manage the American Empire and by extension this effects whether they support left or right in Israel. It effects whether they are liberal or neoconservative. But as you said, Israel us their vital interest. However, while they have differences, they all support American aid to Israel e en as illegal settlements continue and oppose Palestinian statehood through the UN. And good look getting members of US Congress in either party overturning aid to Israel or voting to end settlements or to support Palestinian statehood without posing a risk to their next election.AIPAC is only relevant to lobbying. My post was intended to say two things, but it seems I failed. 1. US Jews are not monolithic. Some, like Wolfowitz and Bill Kristol are avowed neoconservatives who would most likely like to see US forces in Syria, and have been openly dismissive of any Palestinian state. But, not all US Jews agree. 2. The vast majority of all Americans view the Israel Palestinian conflict in fairly broad terms that the only reason there's still any conflict is that the Pales won't abide by any peaceful resolution that acknowledges Israel exists, and opposing Israel's destruction is viewed as a vital strategic interest worth fighting over ... and THAT belief is shared by both political parties.But you just prove the point. Jews have differences of course and all don't think the same, no group does. But regardless of party they are almost unanimously loyal to Israel and both parties are committed to supporting Israel because of AIPAC and jewish donorsThe only point of the post was that Jews in the US are not some monolithic group, and despite any views you might have that differ, both the Dems and Republicans in the US view Israel's right to survival as something for which we're willing to sacrifice our remaining treasure and youth.
Neocons: the belief that we may use our military to capture natural resources, rather than trusting to free market economies, exist, but they aren't running Obama foreign policy.
So, focusing on neoconservatism and Israel or even as the dominant belief behind US policy in the ME, and even less so in Europe, is missing the point.
As to "American Empire" (laugh) there isn't one. What there is is a continuation of Reagan and Thatcher. Military might is justified against any state that denies other states to engage in free commerce with one another. Israel is a bit of exception. Regardless of economic ties, the US won't cut Israel loose. It would be in our economic interests to do so, but we choose not to. The US won't cut S.Korea loose either, but their economy is nothing to sneeze at, so it is geographically linked to trading partners in the Pacific rim.
Absolutely none of that is true.CBS Corporation is majority owned by Murray Rothstein. NBC is owned by Comcast. Their CEO and Chairman is Brian Roberts, who also is the largest shareholder, is Jewish.But please tell us more how Rupert Murdoch controls all American media, lol.CBS is a public corporation. NBC is owned by GE.Rupert Murdoch doesn't own all the media, stop being dishonest. Most of the media in America is Jewish owned or run, it is obvious information to look up. New York Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC all run by Jews.Jews control the media? You mean Jews like Rupert Murdoch?...although the idea of Jews being responsible for Islamic terrorism is considerable.
For example, Muslims are frustrated by the hedonist consumerism of the West, hedonist consumerism which is perpetuated by the media which Jews are in control of:
An Empire of Their Own How the Jews Invented Hollywood Neal Gabler 9780385265577 Amazon.com Books
The music behind Hollywood s golden age - Telegraph
Jews in Hollywood Jewish Actors Jewish Directors Jewish Producers
Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media
Jews In The American Media Hollywood
The ironic part about this is how much conservatives complain about the media as well which deconstructs culture and values.
You'd think conservatives would see what's really going on here, but nope.
In fact, liberals often try to compare Christian conservatives to radical Muslims despite how Muslims, especially Islamists, have extreme beliefs that Christians do not. The point is liberals want the right to relish in hedonist consumerism while deconstructing culture.
I mean if Islamists attacked Hollywood instead of the World Trade Center on 9/11, conservatives would probably argue that liberals got what they deserved and wouldn't advocate intervening in the Middle East at all.
Is Joel Stein, a jewish columnist, anti-semitic when he brags about how they run Hollywood?
Who runs Hollywood C mon - Los Angeles Times
It is just a fact.
You just cant get it right, can you?
All of what i say is true, and can be easily researched on wikipedia. Comcast owns 100% of NBC. NBC Universal, the official name for NBC, it is the "whole network".Absolutely none of that is true.CBS Corporation is majority owned by Murray Rothstein. NBC is owned by Comcast. Their CEO and Chairman is Brian Roberts, who also is the largest shareholder, is Jewish.But please tell us more how Rupert Murdoch controls all American media, lol.CBS is a public corporation. NBC is owned by GE.Rupert Murdoch doesn't own all the media, stop being dishonest. Most of the media in America is Jewish owned or run, it is obvious information to look up. New York Times, LA Times, CBS, NBC all run by Jews.Jews control the media? You mean Jews like Rupert Murdoch?...although the idea of Jews being responsible for Islamic terrorism is considerable.
For example, Muslims are frustrated by the hedonist consumerism of the West, hedonist consumerism which is perpetuated by the media which Jews are in control of:
An Empire of Their Own How the Jews Invented Hollywood Neal Gabler 9780385265577 Amazon.com Books
The music behind Hollywood s golden age - Telegraph
Jews in Hollywood Jewish Actors Jewish Directors Jewish Producers
Seven Jewish Americans Control Most US Media
Jews In The American Media Hollywood
The ironic part about this is how much conservatives complain about the media as well which deconstructs culture and values.
You'd think conservatives would see what's really going on here, but nope.
In fact, liberals often try to compare Christian conservatives to radical Muslims despite how Muslims, especially Islamists, have extreme beliefs that Christians do not. The point is liberals want the right to relish in hedonist consumerism while deconstructing culture.
I mean if Islamists attacked Hollywood instead of the World Trade Center on 9/11, conservatives would probably argue that liberals got what they deserved and wouldn't advocate intervening in the Middle East at all.
Is Joel Stein, a jewish columnist, anti-semitic when he brags about how they run Hollywood?
Who runs Hollywood C mon - Los Angeles Times
It is just a fact.
You just cant get it right, can you?
NBC Universal is owned by Comcast, not the whole network.
The mutual funds own most of CBS.
You're referring to Sumner Redstone.
Remind me how those three entities control the media.
You are a tired sick piece of bigoted shit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone#cite_note-forbes-1Sumner Murray Redstone (born Sumner Murray Rothstein; May 27, 1923) is an American businessman and media magnate. He is the majority owner and Chairman of the Board of the National Amusements theater chain. Through National Amusements, Sumner Redstone and his family are majority owners of CBS Corporation and Viacom (itself the parent company of MTV Networks, BET, and the film studio Paramount Pictures), and are equal partners in MovieTickets.com. According to Forbes as of March 2014 he is worth US $6.2 billion.[1]
