Arab students demanded: Remove offensive painting of Jews destroying mosque

[Lipush]

The cynical and silly demand by Arab students in Tel Aviv university shows the new low of simple lack of understanding.

A painting presenting, or so do Arabs students say, the destruction of Al Aqsa mosque by the 'occupation' is the center of conflict in Tel-Aviv university. KM Taleb-A-Sana from Ra'am-Ta'al politic party demands to remove and apologize for offending the feelings of Muslim students in the university.

In the last few days a Jewish-southerner student, Yif'at Zaifer, presented her painting on the library wall. The Painting shows a bulldozer ruins a building and a group of Jews holding a Menorah and Torah scroll.

"I recived complains about this painting from Arabs and Muslims in the university," said a.p Yosef Clepter, "They claim that there's incitement and an obvious will to hurt Muslim feelings in the drawing."

MK Abu Arar said, "I ask to inform you of this offending painting, hanged on the library wall. This painting will ignite riots and protest by the Muslim students in the university. It's obvious message is to harm Muslim in a way that cannot be interpenetrated otherwise. I call you to remove this offensinve painting and to punish the artist. I'm shocked that you let such an offensive work to be presented in the first place."

But is there really a reason to remove the painting? The artist is surprised, "An inciting painting?" she asks, "That's not a mosque at all, much less Al-Aqsa. That's the ruins of Nezarim synagogue that was destroyed back in 2005. I painted the Jews leaving the synagogue in hopes to save the holy objects inside."

To the question about the confusion she answered, "Maybe because of the dome. But there is no reason for it. The title itself says, in English, "Nezarim synaguge". I'm surprised that politicians protested for nothing, there is no reason for it."

This is the original synagogue in the painting. The Menorah was saved from it, on top of the roof-

In case the Arabs have forgotten, in reality, the vessels didn't destroy the synagogue. It was actually set on fire once the Arab reached and "claimed back" the lands. It was burned down and the Menorah and Torah scroll were saved by the Jews.

So who's to be really offended?

Source in Hebrew: mynet ?? ????-??? - "???? ??????????? ???? ??? ???? ??-????"

 

[Indofred]

Typical of extremist zionist jews.
Create a deliberately nasty paining, designed to cause trouble, then blame everyone once for it.
Pathetic.

 

[Phoenall]

Typical of extremist zionist jews.
Create a deliberately nasty paining, designed to cause trouble, then blame everyone once for it.
Pathetic.

Yes you are as the title does say Nezarim synagogue But then ISLAMONAZIS will always find a way to incite violence

 

[Pennywise]

The only thing offensive about that painting is how atrociously it is rendered. Calling the person who painted that "an artist" is offensive too.

 

[Roudy]

The only thing offensive about that painting is how atrociously it is rendered. Calling the person who painted that "an artist" is offensive too.

Of course, because Joooooos can't be good painters, right, Dollar Dumb Nazi?

 

[Pennywise]

The only thing offensive about that painting is how atrociously it is rendered. Calling the person who painted that "an artist" is offensive too.

Of course, because Joooooos can't be good painters, right, Dollar Dumb Nazi?

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

The irony of you calling anyone dumb, is lost only on you.

 

[Phoenall]

The only thing offensive about that painting is how atrociously it is rendered. Calling the person who painted that "an artist" is offensive too.

Of course, because Joooooos can't be good painters, right, Dollar Dumb Nazi?

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

The irony of you calling anyone dumb, is lost only on you.

Just shows then that you don't understand modernism in the art world, no doubt you find Banksy offensive for his rendering of topical news..............

 

[Roudy]

The only thing offensive about that painting is how atrociously it is rendered. Calling the person who painted that "an artist" is offensive too.

Of course, because Joooooos can't be good painters, right, Dollar Dumb Nazi?

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

The irony of you calling anyone dumb, is lost only on you.

Yessir, Dollar Dumb Nazi "art critic". Ha ha ha.

 

[Pennywise]

Of course, because Joooooos can't be good painters, right, Dollar Dumb Nazi?

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

The irony of you calling anyone dumb, is lost only on you.

Just shows then that you don't understand modernism in the art world, no doubt you find Banksy offensive for his rendering of topical news..............

Oh, that's modernism? Well, color me enlightened. I guess SOUTH PARK falls into the same category.

 

[Lipush]

Typical of extremist zionist jews.
Create a deliberately nasty paining, designed to cause trouble, then blame everyone once for it.
Pathetic.

Are you trying to sound totally stupid?

Be honest- You've read only the title, right?

 

[ogibillm]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

 

[Pennywise]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

It looks like a screen-grab from SOUTH PARK. It also looks like they are exiting the building, not entering.

 

[Pennywise]

And on the real subject, I'm pretty damn sick of people bitching that they can't ever be offended. **** them and **** the ADL too.

 

[Roudy]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

The thing is, Jews built dome shaped temples way before Muslims did.

 

[Roudy]

And on the real subject, I'm pretty damn sick of people bitching that they can't ever be offended. **** them and **** the ADL too.

I've heard of nazis stealing art or destroying it, but yet to see one that's an art critic.

 

[Phoenall]

Yeah, that's exactly what I said.

The irony of you calling anyone dumb, is lost only on you.

Just shows then that you don't understand modernism in the art world, no doubt you find Banksy offensive for his rendering of topical news..............

Oh, that's modernism? Well, color me enlightened. I guess SOUTH PARK falls into the same category.

Nope that is a cartoon aimed at mindless morons that don't understand modern art. Do you watch it much ?

 

[Phoenall]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

Looks nothing like this..............

Unless you are using illegal substances

 

[Phoenall]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

It looks like a screen-grab from SOUTH PARK. It also looks like they are exiting the building, not entering.

From the artist as shown in the original post

The artist is surprised, "An inciting painting?" she asks, "That's not a mosque at all, much less Al-Aqsa. That's the ruins of Nezarim synagogue that was destroyed back in 2005. I painted the Jews leaving the synagogue in hopes to save the holy objects inside

Clear enough for you now

 

[GHook93]

Typical of extremist zionist jews.
Create a deliberately nasty paining, designed to cause trouble, then blame everyone once for it.
Pathetic.

Typical retarded muslim fucktwat. You didn't read the article I see. It wasn't a mosque asshole it was a Jewish Temple. One that was destroyed. It had nothing to do with your demonic religion!

 

[Lipush]

here's the thing, the painting doesn't look like Nezarim synagogue. It looks like Al Aqsa mosque. the artist can call it what they want, but the proof is in the pudding, as it were.

No, it's not.

Please people, get with the program, and don't try to fix others when the mistake is your own.

It doesn't look at all like Al Aqsa.

THIS:

Is al Aqsa mosque. What you're talking about is only part of the area near Al Aqsa called "The Dome of the Rock", which IS NOT the mosque in question.

Now let us look at the synagogue in the painting, after it was burned down by Palestinians:

Now you're more than welcome to correct yourself, pal!