Cohen will not go to jail for Trump. His loyalty ends now.
Cohen is already under investigation for bank fraud and campaign finance violations.
Why are so many people that work for Trump dirty?
“ I pick the best people.”
Lmao
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/853779?section=politics&keywords=cohen-fall-guy-trump-raids&year=2018&month=04&date=10&id=853779&aliaspath=/Manage/Articles/Template-Main
Why are so many people that work for Trump dirty?
“ I pick the best people.”
They may well be the best people for doing the "shady sh*t" Trump would have them do.
When I say "best people," I have in mind a set of character traits
and practical abilities, and one of those character traits is that one is a "good person," that one means well as well as behaving well toward others. I suspect for Trump, being a "good person" means being good to him, but not necessarily being a preponderantly good, ethical person in general.
I suspect everyone has the traits noted in the image above. I'm certain, however, that not everyone has them in proportions that result in their being a "good" person. For instance, ambition is a good trait to have, but too much of it isn't good at all. Integrity, on the other hand, is a trait whereby there's no such thing as too much of it, but plenty of folks haven't enough of it. Being a good person is about the balance of all those characteristics....Too much of one or several, or not enough of one or several, and one simply isn't a good, an ethical person. Be that as it may, one could nonetheless be the best person for some task.
Take the task of being Trump's "fix it" guy as Cohen has been. I could never do that, certainly not well enough to make a living doing it. My sense of self-respect and integrity wouldn't let me. I'd have had to tell Trump, "No. You did X, and now you must pay the price for having done it. I'm not going to save you from yourself." It's for the same reasons that I could not be a defense attorney. I would have to know whether my client did commit the crime, and knowing that s/he did indeed commit the transgression, I would not -- not by my own constitution and not by the way the law is written -- be able to defend the person. I appreciate that suspects need advocates, but I'm not at all the best person for being one's legal advocate, unless, of course, they are indeed innocent, in which case I would (with appropriate training) be a very good, perhaps among the best, advocate. As a defense attorney, however, one doesn't always have the luxury of having innocent clients.