Q. unable to get a bump stock, what alternative(s) did he have
Any number of them, including...
Editing my post it dishonest, not that I ever have found you to be honest, so it was not unexpected.
You posted only the question. not my answer.
A. Save the time, the carnage and bullets by turning the gun on himself.
Your answer did not make any sense.
Not that the whole event made any sense.
Paddock was wealthy, healthy, and successful.
I don't buy that he harmed anyone else or himself.
I think he was killed first, before any other shots were fired.
But the POINT is that there is no proposed law, like a bumpstock ban, that could have prevented this from happening.
Since he could easily have afforded the license for a real machinegun, he was not at all dependent on a bump stock.
And in fact, he could easily have made his own, modified a gun into a machine gun, bought an illegal machinegun, etc.
There is no reason to believe an addition law like this would do any good at all.