Antisemitic U.N. issues eight resolutions, all against Israel

The Gaza strip has been under a land, sea, and air blockade for years. Israel controls the flow of food in the Gaza strip, calculating it to the single calorie. They want just enough food to go in to keep the Palestinians from starving, but just enough. Unemployment in the Gaza strip is north of fifty percent, Israel has all but eliminated work permits. Instead, they have to import agricultural workers from Thailand and Sri Lanka, by the thousands.

Funny, keep a population just above the point of starvation and deny them employment and then act all surprised when that population spawns a terrorist group that lashes out violently.
You'd better inform the people of Gaza of their starvation! For the first six months of 2023, they exported 12,000 tons of fruits and vegetables to Israel, with a value of about $10 million.

Edited to correct: the $10 million figure was for 2022, not 2023
 
Last edited:
As is the usual pattern, America's propaganda attempts to demonize the UN when it's outspoken on condemnation of America or the Zionist regime.

But America will stick with the UN because it has a veto that effectively can defy any progress the rest of the world attempts.
We will stand by our friend Israel, thank you very much.
 
You'd better inform the people of Gaza of their starvation! For the first six months of 2023, they exported 12,000 tons of fruits and vegetables to Israel, with a value of about $10 million.

Edited to correct: the $10 million figure was for 2022, not 2023

See how that works? It is called documentation. Food insecurity rate, 69%. As to exports to Israel,


A ban is in place.
 

See how that works? It is called documentation. Food insecurity rate, 69%. As to exports to Israel,


A ban is in place.
Oh, I see exactly how it works. You've already downgraded your initial claim of starvation down to the exact calorie count caused exclusively by Israeli control over access to food to a reasonable claim of food insecurity due to a VARIETY of reasons, most of which are not directly under Israeli control. (Thank you for those sources).

The one exception to that, is the TEMPORARY ban on exports because the people of Gaza used exports of food to attack Israel and kill or injure Israeli civilians by hiding explosives in the food shipment.

So you create a false narrative on the "evil" of Israel, call me out on facts which I know off the top of my head, and are easily fact-checked, then revised your claim based on the facts that you went and looked up, all the while ignoring Gaza's complicity in creating their own hardships. See how that works?
 
Last edited:
Incidentally, the above post of mine demonstrates EXACTLY how UN prejudice against Israel works.

1. Present a false narrative to demonize Israel. (Pick any of your favorites: apartheid, genocide, war crimes, open air prison, concentration camps, occupation, illegal and immoral, settlements, whatever).

2. Call out anyone who presents facts because "reasons".

3. Revise or misrepresent international law to reflect how what Israel is doing is "bad", whilst failing to apply it to any other circumstance.

4. Refuse to acknowledge the complicity of other states and non-government actors.
 
Last edited:
The U.N., in the wake of the terror attack by HAMAS savages in which they set Jewish children on fire, cut the heads off babies, baked an newborn to death in an oven, raped women until they died, and stabbed men to death, issued eight resolutions - all of which condemn Israel. There was not a SINGLE resolution condemning what Muslim monsters did.

The U.N.’s never-ending, one-sided bias against the sole Jewish country in its effort to demonize it, is the very definition of antisemitism. When Trump gets back in, I hope he kicks them out of our country and withholds our membership.

The UN resolutions on the Israel-Hamas conflict did not specifically mention Hamas for various reasons. Here are some possible explanations:

1. Political considerations: The UN Security Council is composed of member states with different political positions and interests. Some countries may have hesitated to explicitly mention Hamas in resolutions due to political sensitivities or concerns about potential backlash from certain parties involved in the conflict.

2. Lack of consensus: The UN Security Council operates on the basis of consensus among its members. It can be challenging to reach a consensus on resolutions that explicitly mention specific groups or entities involved in a conflict. In the case of the Israel-Hamas conflict, disagreements among member states may have hindered the inclusion of explicit references to Hamas.

3. Focus on broader issues: Resolutions on the Israel-Hamas conflict often aim to address broader issues such as the humanitarian situation, ceasefire, or protection of civilians. In some cases, the focus may have been on these broader aspects rather than explicitly naming Hamas.

4. Different perspectives on the conflict: Member states have different perspectives on the Israel-Hamas conflict. Some may view Hamas as a legitimate resistance movement, while others consider it a terrorist organization. These differing views can influence the wording of resolutions and whether or not Hamas is specifically mentioned.

While some resolutions did not explicitly mention Hamas, they still condemned violence against civilians and called for humanitarian pauses in the conflict. The absence of explicit mention does not necessarily imply support or endorsement of Hamas's actions by the UN. :)

Sources:

1. UN Security Council fails again to address Israel-Hamas war, rejecting US and Russian resolutions

2. India Abstains From UN Vote On Israel Which Didn't Mention Hamas Attack

3. UN Security Council adopts resolution for ‘humanitarian pauses’ in Gaza
 
Oh, I see exactly how it works. You've already downgraded your initial claim of starvation down to the exact calorie count caused exclusively by Israeli control over access to food to a reasonable claim of food insecurity due to a VARIETY of reasons, most of which are not directly under Israeli control. (Thank you for those sources).

The one exception to that, is the TEMPORARY ban on exports because the people of Gaza used exports of food to attack Israel and kill or injure Israeli civilians by hiding explosives in the food shipment.

So you create a false narrative on the "evil" of Israel, call me out on facts which I know off the top of my head, and are easily fact-checked, then revised your claim based on the facts that you went and looked up, all the while ignoring Gaza's complicity in creating their own hardships. See how that works?
Not sure what is so hard to understand. First, I never claimed Palestinians in the Gaza Strip were starving, I claimed they are held just above the point of starvation due to the Israeli blockade and limitations on imports. To the calorie, TO THE CALORIE, that is some sick ass shit. Somewhere in Israel there is an office, and in that office one person, or several people, actually measure the number of calories from food imports going into the Gaza strip. They are tasked with limiting those calories to just above the starvation level.

Imagine a for-profit prison in the United States, limiting calories provided to prisoners to 800 calories a day, hell, maybe even 1200. Just so you know, the average is over 2,000 calories a day. You think the prisoners might rise up and revolt? Hell, it would make Attica look like a damn picnic.

And quite honestly, what you know off the top of your head don't amount to a hill of beans. Document or STFU. And your claim, that food insecurity in the Gaza Strip is caused by factors beyond Israel's control is clearly rebutted in my linked document.

The blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip and the successive wars from 2008 until the last three-day war in August 2022 is among the most important factors negatively affecting local food production and increasing poverty rates as a result of the destruction of agricultural infrastructure and the restriction of access to agricultural lands.

Hell, the massive increase in food insecurity can be directly linked to the blockade that started in 2008. Did you not read the report?
 
Israel is not a terrorist state?
Israel didn't burn 20,000 civilians?

No, that is only rhetoric by Hamas supporters,
who sure have all the Gazans to spare,
only to joke about baking powder...

How much Gazans need to be
sacrificed for the failure of
the Hamas Caliphate?
 
Incidentally, the above post of mine demonstrates EXACTLY how UN prejudice against Israel works.

1. Present a false narrative to demonize Israel. (Pick any of your favorites: apartheid, genocide, war crimes, open air prison, concentration camps, occupation, illegal and immoral, settlements, whatever).

2. Call out anyone who presents facts because "reasons".

3. Revise or misrepresent international law to reflect how what Israel is doing is "bad", whilst failing to apply it to any other circumstance.

4. Refuse to acknowledge the complicity of other states and non-government actors.
Just stop right there. Demonstrate, with documentation, that Israel is not an apartheid state, that Israel is not committing genocide at the very moment, and that members of the Knesset are not supporting that genocide. Show me how Israel is not practicing collective punishment, targeting critical infrastructure like the power grid, and denying fuel and food to the people in the Gaza Strip, all war crimes. Demonstrate how Israel is attempting to limit civilian casualties, a requirement under international law. With a air, land, and sea blockade, and total control of the border. With the near elimination of work permits, and the restriction of travel in the Gaza strip, how is it not an open-air prison or concentration camp? And best of all, how in the hell are the settlements in the West Bank, that have continued to expand, both legal and moral.

Look, you got some real work to do. I doubt you even attempt to support your fantasy world. Your ignorance is the biggest obstacle to finding peace in the middle east. There would be a two-state solution, Israel would return to the 1967 borders, the settlements in the West Bank would be eliminated, and terrorist organizations like Hamas would cease to exist if the United States would eliminate all aid to Israel and start siding with the rest of the world at the UN.
 
Just stop right there. Demonstrate, with documentation, that Israel is not an apartheid state, that Israel is not committing genocide at the very moment, and that members of the Knesset are not supporting that genocide. Show me how Israel is not practicing collective punishment, targeting critical infrastructure like the power grid, and denying fuel and food to the people in the Gaza Strip, all war crimes. Demonstrate how Israel is attempting to limit civilian casualties, a requirement under international law. With a air, land, and sea blockade, and total control of the border. With the near elimination of work permits, and the restriction of travel in the Gaza strip, how is it not an open-air prison or concentration camp? And best of all, how in the hell are the settlements in the West Bank, that have continued to expand, both legal and moral.

Look, you got some real work to do. I doubt you even attempt to support your fantasy world. Your ignorance is the biggest obstacle to finding peace in the middle east. There would be a two-state solution, Israel would return to the 1967 borders, the settlements in the West Bank would be eliminated, and terrorist organizations like Hamas would cease to exist if the United States would eliminate all aid to Israel and start siding with the rest of the world at the UN.
No work at all . Hamas attacked. Israel is at War.

No one needs to prove a damn thing to you.
 
The propaganda America has generated against Hamas is failing. The rest of the world either doesn't believe it or are looking at the situation on the ground in which the Zionists are slaughtering civilians at a rate that is ten times what Hamas was guilty of doing.

The US propagandists are left with dressing up the kill to make it sound worse by Hamas. But the numbers can't be falsely manipulated any other way.
This is having a huge impact on the Zionist's and America's propaganda campaign!

And a powerful impact against Biden's efforts on pretending to be somewhat neutral.
America is doing something wrong. There's no other explanation for why the UN has turned to believing the facts as presented by the rest of the world.

Get over yourself, Mr. "The rest of the world"...
How many bandwagon fallacies needed
to feel justified in this degeneracy?

"Free Palestine" mob mostly relies on a false image of majority,
and since 7th Oct. has given up any moral cause for mere bravado.
All there's left is either denial and/or outright call to take things "in their own hands".
It's not about standing any moral ground for "Free Palestine", and the majority is with Israel,
likewise, seeing the caliphate mobs on their streets, and examining the appropriate treatment.
 
No work at all . Hamas attacked. Israel is at War.

No one needs to prove a damn thing to you.
Israel is at war, with about the only entity their chickenass shits can fight. Are they at war with Hamas? No, can they even demonstrate one Hamas KIA? Did the attacks even originate from the Gaza Strip, or was it the West Bank? Nope, the pansy ass IDF is at war with women and children of the Gaza Strip, suffering from near starvation under 15 years of a land, air, and sea embargo. Suffering from unemployment, lack of opportunity, and complete control of their very movements. Living in poverty. Yep, these are the only enemies the IDF can handle. Killing women and children, they get off on that shit. Some sick ass Mofos.
 
Get over yourself, Mr. "The rest of the world"...
How many bandwagon fallacies needed
to feel justified in this degeneracy?

"Free Palestine" mob mostly relies on a false image of majority,
and since 7th Oct. has given up any moral cause for mere bravado.
All there's left is either denial and/or outright call to take things "in their own hands".
It's not about standing any moral ground for "Free Palestine", and the majority is with Israel,
likewise, seeing the caliphate mobs on their streets, and examining the appropriate treatment.
The majority of the US is with Israel. The rest of the world, not so much. But hell, we are talking about the US, a damn population so flippin ignorant they elected a fat orange con man with an IQ in double digits as president.
 
  • Fact
Reactions: cnm

Antisemitic U.N. issues eight resolutions, all against Israel​

What other nation states can the UN issue resolutions against?
 
Last edited:

Antisemitic U.N. issues eight resolutions, all against Israel​


:rolleyes:


1700959193530.png
 
Just stop right there. Demonstrate, with documentation, that Israel is not an apartheid state, that Israel is not committing genocide at the very moment, and that members of the Knesset are not supporting that genocide. Show me how Israel is not practicing collective punishment, targeting critical infrastructure like the power grid, and denying fuel and food to the people in the Gaza Strip, all war crimes. Demonstrate how Israel is attempting to limit civilian casualties, a requirement under international law. With a air, land, and sea blockade, and total control of the border. With the near elimination of work permits, and the restriction of travel in the Gaza strip, how is it not an open-air prison or concentration camp? And best of all, how in the hell are the settlements in the West Bank, that have continued to expand, both legal and moral.

Look, you got some real work to do. I doubt you even attempt to support your fantasy world. Your ignorance is the biggest obstacle to finding peace in the middle east. There would be a two-state solution, Israel would return to the 1967 borders, the settlements in the West Bank would be eliminated, and terrorist organizations like Hamas would cease to exist if the United States would eliminate all aid to Israel and start siding with the rest of the world at the UN.
Sure. Let's start with an easy one. What year did the State of Palestine come into being? What are its borders? What legal document supports this conclusion?

Bonus question: Where is the border between Jordan and the State of Palestine and what legal document created that border? Same question for Egypt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top