So what? You can't do scientific discourse in front of the other prisoners. Chronically relying on four words to bolster your argument eventually shows that you are mouthing off about something you're uneducated about. You are a Sparky clone.
Anti-vaxxers win
- Thread starter Manonthestreet
- Start date
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #42
Apparently, that is only applicable as an argument for murdering innocent children.
It's not your body or your choice when they want to use you as a guinea pig for dangerous and illegal medical experiments.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #43
Many jobs require a considerable amount of preparation to get into the profession. Education and training and experience and such.
Your argument is that someone who has gone through the process of becoming qualified for a particular profession should be subject to being forced to leave that profession, because a new, unjustifiable and anticipatable mandate is imposed on that profession, such as consenting to be injected with dangerous experimental drugs.
What is someone to do who went to all the trouble to become qualified to be a physician, when he is kicked out of that profession for refusing to be used illegally as a human guinea pig in a dangerous medical experiment? He certainly did not agree to that when he chose to pursue that profession, and there can be no excuse for imposing that on him.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #44
Not at all a valid comparison.
Legitimate vaccines are backed by sound science, proving their safety and efficacy.
These dangerous mRNA drugs are not, and the growing body of science seems to be proving them to be both unsafe and ineffective.
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #45
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
A physician can start their own practice and have their own rules.
Hospitals have had mandatory flu shot rules for decades, nobody ever whined about those
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #47
Once again, legitimate vaccines are backed by solid science.
This dangerous, experimental mRNA shit is not.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
That is your opinion and I fully respect your right to hold that opinion.
If you and your employer disagree on that, they have no obligation to continue to employ you.
beautress
Always Faithful
Manonthestreet, I am allergic to virus shots. The last time I got a vaccination for flu and pneumonia, I went into shock that scared the living daylights out of me. I wouldn't take a vaccine shot again, and by some fate of good fortune, I simply isolated myself to my own farm, wore masks and kept my distance from others when shopping for groceries, gas, or a home cooked meal at a diner if it had 6' of space between tables. I have other issues, so on those days, someone else gets to do the cooking.How many people were denied treatment due to lack of help so the employer could masquerade as righteous
500 Fired Health Care Workers Win Historic Multi-Million Dollar Settlement in COVID Mandate 'Wake-up Call'
Health care workers who were fired for not getting a COVID shot have won a major victory. The Liberty Counsel has announced a "historic" $10.3 million settlement in the nation's first-of-its-kind classwide lawsuit.www1.cbn.com
I'm not the only one who is allergic to virus shots, 20% to 30% of the population is as well, they just may not know the symptoms I know because I took First Aid in Junior High School and again my Senior year. Shock symptoms (anaphylactic) can be alleviated by a warm blanket in winter or in Hospital Winter, where the temperature is kept extremely cold to reduce noxious germs from multiplying and resulting in vectored airborne illnesses.
Here's why I don't take vacccines:
The bottom line
"Vaccines prevent some terrible disease that most of us have been lucky enough to never see. Vaccines are the best weapon we have for viruses, because antibiotics don’t work on them. Even if you have a reaction to a vaccine, as long as it’s not anaphylactic, it’s usually not nearly as bad as the real infection would have been."
How Common Are Allergic Reactions to Vaccines? - GoodRx
As the COVID-19 vaccine distribution continues, concerns have been raised about possible allergic reactions to vaccines in general. However, severe allergic reactions to vaccines are rare.
www.goodrx.com
Forcing people like me to risk my life and well being is just dead wrong. Anaphylactic shock is a very bad way to die, and anaphylaxis is a deadly threat that I survived the last time I took a flu/pneumonia injection. Next time I won't be so lucky if someone slips me a vaccine if I'm in a hospital bed, fast asleep. Keep in mind, people become health care providers have a 95% chance of saving your threatened life. My guess is that even the best nurses may not realize anaphylactic shock that someone has avoided by deep breathing to get themselves to the hospital in one piece, that person still has anaphylactic shock and needs elemental care that forgetfulness can cause the patient's death or severe discomfort if they are experiencing the throes of shock. Nurses may not know anaphylaxis is a dangerous symptom and even get angry if the patient tells her/him that they experienced shock symptoms earlier, especially if that patient got their injection earlier than directly going into flu season. That happened to me, and I hate that hospital with a passion to this day.
Symptoms of anaphylaxis
If you or someone you know is exhibiting symptoms of Anaphylaxis, seek medical attention immediately.
Common symptoms include:
- Skin reactions such as itching and hives
- Flushed and pale Skin
- Lower blood pressure
- Difficulty breathing
- Choking
- Weak and rapid pulse rate
- Vomiting
- Nausea
- Dizziness or fainting
Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #50
Not an opinion.
Hard facts.
This mRNA shit has not been vetted through the procedures that are legally required of all new drugs before they are approved for general use. They have not been adequately vetted for safety nor efficacy.
And a growing body of empirical evidence seems to be showing that if required to meet the standards normally required of new drugs, this mRNA shit would fail.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
AMart
Diamond Member
- Dec 29, 2020
- 12,956
- 13,400
- 2,288
- Banned
- #52
They won't need to if they want their old job back. They will get back their same positions as part of the settlement, and
NorthShore will also change its unlawful "no religious accommodations" policy to make it consistent with the law, and to provide religious accommodations in every position across its numerous facilities. No position in any NorthShore facility will be considered off limits to unvaccinated employees with approved religious exemptions.
In addition, employees who were terminated because of their religious refusal of the COVID shots will be eligible for rehire if they apply within 90 days of final settlement approval by the court, and they will retain their previous seniority level.
candycorn
Diamond Member
Those who took the jab (aka the ones still alive) were the winners
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Yes, they messed up by not offering religious accommodations. This was a mistake on their part. The right move would have been to offer religious accommodations to anyone that had them for previous required vaccines and denied them for anyone that just all of a sudden got religious.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
BlackSand
Nobody
- Oct 23, 2013
- 23,348
- 13,666
- 1,435
.
No particular date is necessary as to when the person came upon their current religious objections, so it wouldn't make a difference.
One's religious beliefs and faith are not bound by your worldly desires.
.
No particular date is necessary as to when the person came upon their current religious objections, so it wouldn't make a difference.
One's religious beliefs and faith are not bound by your worldly desires.
.
Last edited:
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,301
- 20,736
- 2,290
Why honest intellectually sound minded people steadily entertain your bull crap is amazing really.. lol
The losers' autopsy tissue has been preserved.
Aug 2022
Cell tropism and viral clearance during SARS-CoV-2 lung infection - PubMed
Pulmonary capillary microthrombosis has been proposed as a major pathogenetic factor driving severe COVID-19. Autopsy studies reported endothelialitis but it is under debate if it is caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection of endothelial cells. In this study, RNA in situ hybridization was used to detect...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
Joe Biden Tells Room Full of Black People He is Smarter Than Them- Started by Captain Creeper
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Unprovoked San Francisco stabbing exposes woke policy that critics say ‘shields’ suspects
- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 1
-
