Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

[dcbl]

Oh wow

I'm very surorised

No, really, who would have ever thought that this was possible?

Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

When Sen. Jeff Flake was accosted by two women in an elevator on Capitol Hill, it was seen as one of the most striking moments of last week’s Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination battle.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Seemingly organic, powerful protests. But in both instances, the women involved came from a nonprofit called Center for Popular Democracy that has received funding from liberal billionaire George Soros, records show. Ana Maria Archila, who confronted Flake is the group’s co-executive director.

 

[bodecea]

(((Soros)))

 

[dcbl]

I wonder if the MSM or eff bee eye will investigate this...

 

[easyt65]

...Is he funding / paying Feinstein, Durbin, Blumenthal, and rest of the scheming Democrats 'Herman Cain'ing Kavanaugh, too?


Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

"Soros also has ties to a liberal group running anti-Kavanuagh TV ads focused on his accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations. Demand Justice is funded by a nonprofit Sixteen Thirst Fund that has received more than $730,000 from the Soros foundation in 2016 and 2017.

Video of McConnell being confronted was posted on Twitter after being shot by Ady Barkan, a Center for Popular Democracy staffer."

 

[chops_]

I highly doubt it....but what do I know?

Fact-checking internet rumors about Christine Blasey Ford

 

[Care4all]

...Is he funding / paying Feinstein, Durbin, Blumenthal, and rest of the scheming Democrats 'Herman Cain'ing Kavanaugh, too?


Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

"Soros also has ties to a liberal group running anti-Kavanuagh TV ads focused on his accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations. Demand Justice is funded by a nonprofit Sixteen Thirst Fund that has received more than $730,000 from the Soros foundation in 2016 and 2017.

Video of McConnell being confronted was posted on Twitter after being shot by Ady Barkan, a Center for Popular Democracy staffer."

I have not seen a single anti-kavanaugh ad in my region of Maine, and for the past 2 to 4 weeks, I see about 50 ads or more a day in support of him on the 24/7 channels... Who is paying for those ads in favor of Kavanaugh?

Who is it, that he is going to ''owe''?

 

[easyt65]

Hillary took $145 million from Russia.
Feinstein took millions from China.
Wouldn't be a shocker to learn the traitors took money from Soros to carry this out.

 

[Stratford57]

Soros has been behind all "protests" which benefit the Swamp all over the world for years. He's got the biggest experience in overthrowing the governments.

2011 WSJ: Soros is the biggest modern adventurer

1999: Soros financed purchasing weapons for the extremists from Kosovo Deliberation Army. The result of their ethnic cleansing was that thousands of Serbs had to leave their homelands and Soros gained control of Kosovo’s natural resources of gold, silver, chrome, copper, nickel and coal.

2000: Open Society initiated Milosevic overthrowing in Serbia.

2003: Georgia, Shevardnadze’s overthrowing.

2005: a coup in Kirgizia.

2014: a coup in Ukraine.

 

[Stratford57]

I wonder if the MSM or eff bee eye will investigate this...

So far all "investigations" have been aimed to harm Trump and to benefit the Swamp (which Soros is obviously part of).

 

[WillowTree]

...Is he funding / paying Feinstein, Durbin, Blumenthal, and rest of the scheming Democrats 'Herman Cain'ing Kavanaugh, too?


Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

"Soros also has ties to a liberal group running anti-Kavanuagh TV ads focused on his accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations. Demand Justice is funded by a nonprofit Sixteen Thirst Fund that has received more than $730,000 from the Soros foundation in 2016 and 2017.

Video of McConnell being confronted was posted on Twitter after being shot by Ady Barkan, a Center for Popular Democracy staffer."

I have not seen a single anti-kavanaugh ad in my region of Maine, and for the past 2 to 4 weeks, I see about 50 ads or more a day in support of him on the 24/7 channels... Who is paying for those ads in favor of Kavanaugh?

Who is it, that he is going to ''owe''?

Citizens United!

 

[WillowTree]

ACLU is anti Kavanaugh.

 

[Mr Natural]

(((Soros)))

The Keyser Soze of politics.

 

[Billy_Bob]

ACLU is anti Kavanaugh.

Their add suggests destroying his life is ok because it furthers the lefts agenda.. That should tell you all you need to know about the Criminal Enterprise known as the ACLU..

 

[shockedcanadian]

Oh wow

I'm very surorised

No, really, who would have ever thought that this was possible?

Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

When Sen. Jeff Flake was accosted by two women in an elevator on Capitol Hill, it was seen as one of the most striking moments of last week’s Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination battle.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Seemingly organic, powerful protests. But in both instances, the women involved came from a nonprofit called Center for Popular Democracy that has received funding from liberal billionaire George Soros, records show. Ana Maria Archila, who confronted Flake is the group’s co-executive director.

The question is, what are your agencies going to do about this? Is the new norm "whoever has the most money just creates havok in any nation they please?"

 

[Care4all]

...Is he funding / paying Feinstein, Durbin, Blumenthal, and rest of the scheming Democrats 'Herman Cain'ing Kavanaugh, too?


Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

"Soros also has ties to a liberal group running anti-Kavanuagh TV ads focused on his accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations. Demand Justice is funded by a nonprofit Sixteen Thirst Fund that has received more than $730,000 from the Soros foundation in 2016 and 2017.

Video of McConnell being confronted was posted on Twitter after being shot by Ady Barkan, a Center for Popular Democracy staffer."

I have not seen a single anti-kavanaugh ad in my region of Maine, and for the past 2 to 4 weeks, I see about 50 ads or more a day in support of him on the 24/7 channels... Who is paying for those ads in favor of Kavanaugh?

Who is it, that he is going to ''owe''?

Citizens United!

yep, good ole Kavanaugh lead to that crappy Citizen's United

Albert W. Alschuler is the Julius Kreeger professor emeritus at the University of Chicago Law School.

As a candidate, Donald Trump called super PACs “very corrupt,” “a scam” and “a disaster,” castigating both his fellow Republicans and his Democratic opponent for being dependent on cash from these groups. In a nation in which most voters believe their own representatives in Congress have sold their votes for cash or campaign contributions, his promise to “drain the swamp” resonated.

So much for that. With President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, the president is attempting to place the man who created the super PAC on the highest court in the land.

When people complain about money in politics, they often bemoan the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC. But before there was Citizens United, there was Emily’s List v. FEC, the 2009 case that allowed unlimited contributions to super PACs.

Kavanaugh wrote the opinion in Emily’s List as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, striking down restrictions on contributions to independent political committees. In the opinion, he declared that these committees “are constitutionally entitled to raise and spend unlimited money in support of candidates for elected office.” He reasoned that it was “implausible” that contributions to independent groups could corrupt candidates.

Trump had it right; Kavanaugh had it wrong. Contributions to super PACs can corrupt. In the recent prosecution of Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), for example, prosecutors alleged that a co-defendant made two $300,000 contributions to a super PAC supporting Menendez’s reelection in exchange for the senator’s aid in resolving a Medicare billing dispute. Although a judge concluded after a hung jury that the government had not proved its case, he ruled that designating a super PAC as the recipient of a payment cannot legalize bribery or make bribery a First Amendment right.

For 42 years, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of limiting contributions to candidates, but Kavanaugh’s ruling provided an easy way around the limits — allowing donors to give millions of dollars to support a candidate so long as the money goes to a group “independent” of the candidate. No legislator voted for this topsy-turvy system of campaign financing, and no sane legislator ever would.

In fact, Kavanaugh appeared ready to go further. He acknowledged that his ruling would create an “asymmetry” between how the law treats money going to independent groups and money going directly to candidates. His solution? Raise or eliminate the limits on contributions to parties and candidates.
Opinion | Brett Kavanaugh, the man who created the super PAC

 

[WillowTree]

...Is he funding / paying Feinstein, Durbin, Blumenthal, and rest of the scheming Democrats 'Herman Cain'ing Kavanaugh, too?


Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

"Soros also has ties to a liberal group running anti-Kavanuagh TV ads focused on his accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations. Demand Justice is funded by a nonprofit Sixteen Thirst Fund that has received more than $730,000 from the Soros foundation in 2016 and 2017.

Video of McConnell being confronted was posted on Twitter after being shot by Ady Barkan, a Center for Popular Democracy staffer."

I have not seen a single anti-kavanaugh ad in my region of Maine, and for the past 2 to 4 weeks, I see about 50 ads or more a day in support of him on the 24/7 channels... Who is paying for those ads in favor of Kavanaugh?

Who is it, that he is going to ''owe''?

Citizens United!

yep, good ole Kavanaugh lead to that crappy Citizen's United

Albert W. Alschuler is the Julius Kreeger professor emeritus at the University of Chicago Law School.

As a candidate, Donald Trump called super PACs “very corrupt,” “a scam” and “a disaster,” castigating both his fellow Republicans and his Democratic opponent for being dependent on cash from these groups. In a nation in which most voters believe their own representatives in Congress have sold their votes for cash or campaign contributions, his promise to “drain the swamp” resonated.

So much for that. With President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, the president is attempting to place the man who created the super PAC on the highest court in the land.

When people complain about money in politics, they often bemoan the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC. But before there was Citizens United, there was Emily’s List v. FEC, the 2009 case that allowed unlimited contributions to super PACs.

Kavanaugh wrote the opinion in Emily’s List as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, striking down restrictions on contributions to independent political committees. In the opinion, he declared that these committees “are constitutionally entitled to raise and spend unlimited money in support of candidates for elected office.” He reasoned that it was “implausible” that contributions to independent groups could corrupt candidates.

Trump had it right; Kavanaugh had it wrong. Contributions to super PACs can corrupt. In the recent prosecution of Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), for example, prosecutors alleged that a co-defendant made two $300,000 contributions to a super PAC supporting Menendez’s reelection in exchange for the senator’s aid in resolving a Medicare billing dispute. Although a judge concluded after a hung jury that the government had not proved its case, he ruled that designating a super PAC as the recipient of a payment cannot legalize bribery or make bribery a First Amendment right.

For 42 years, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of limiting contributions to candidates, but Kavanaugh’s ruling provided an easy way around the limits — allowing donors to give millions of dollars to support a candidate so long as the money goes to a group “independent” of the candidate. No legislator voted for this topsy-turvy system of campaign financing, and no sane legislator ever would.

In fact, Kavanaugh appeared ready to go further. He acknowledged that his ruling would create an “asymmetry” between how the law treats money going to independent groups and money going directly to candidates. His solution? Raise or eliminate the limits on contributions to parties and candidates.
Opinion | Brett Kavanaugh, the man who created the super PAC

Nothing at all crappy about citizens united. They just disagree with you and your ilk. Too bad cupcake! Not everyone is a libtard.

 

[longknife]

Oh wow

I'm very surorised

No, really, who would have ever thought that this was possible?

Anti-Kavanaugh protesters accosting senators have ties to Soros

When Sen. Jeff Flake was accosted by two women in an elevator on Capitol Hill, it was seen as one of the most striking moments of last week’s Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination battle.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Seemingly organic, powerful protests. But in both instances, the women involved came from a nonprofit called Center for Popular Democracy that has received funding from liberal billionaire George Soros, records show. Ana Maria Archila, who confronted Flake is the group’s co-executive director.

Free Speech is vital to the future of our republic. But, there comes a time when something has to be done about verbal and physical assault against those one disagrees with. I think these protestors should be arrested and charged.