.
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
1. All or nothing thinking: Things are placed in black or white categories. If things are less than perfect self is viewed as failure.
2. Over generalization: Single event is viewed as continuous failure.
3. Mental filter: Details in life (positive or negative) are amplified in importance while opposite is rejected.
4. Minimizing: Perceiving one or opposite experiences (positive or negative) as absolute and maintaining singularity of belief to one or the other.
5. Mind reading: One absolutely concludes that others are reacting positively or negatively without investigating reality.
6. Fortune Telling: Based on previous 5 distortions, anticipation of negative or positive outcome of situations is established
7. Catastrophizing: Exaggerated importance of self's failures and others successes.
8. Emotional reasoning: One feels as though emotional state IS reality of situation.
9. "Should" statements: Self imposed rules about behavior creating guilt at self inability to adhere and anger at others in their inability to conform to self's rules.
10. Labeling: Instead of understanding errors over generalization is applied.
11. Personalization: Thinking that the actions or statements of others are a reaction to you.
12. Entitlement: Believing that you deserve things you have not earned.
Just try thinking with some of those, especially when there are 3 or 4 people agreeing upon them. Oh man! Well .. .. .. I guess you have and that's why you posted as you did.
Of course we are ALL inclined to suffer from some or all of these logical mistakes at aome time or the other.
What I find troubling is that with many people, this is their constant
modus operandi.
Let's face it. People are pretty easy to fool.
Give them a LIE that somehow makes them feel better about themselves, and most people will CLING TO THAT LIE and cherish it as a basica truth no matter how much empiracle evidence refutes the lie.
That is one of the reasons that PROPAGNDISTS LIKE TO CREATE
scapegoat CLASSES.
The SCAPEGOAT CLASS give the propaganda targets somebody they can feel inherently superior to.
Everybody needs some scapegoat to climb on top of, so that they feel better about themselves.
Here on this board we find number examples of that kind of irrational thinking going on.
On ever board like this, actually.
The TEAPARTY's SCAPEGOAT CLASS was the government.
The OWS' SCAPEOAT CLASS was WALL STREET AND THE mythical 1%.
Note how in both cases the activists had to STOP THINKING CLEARLY in order to feel better about theselves?