Another Year And The Ones Who Were Involved In 911

[daws101]

receivers that would very likely be activated by a stray signal.

You are again working entirely from incredulity, without any basis for the above argument. State of the art coded receivers will only accept the unique code that has been assigned to that receiver.
There already are commercial products on the market that do exactly this job, that is wireless CD.

right! and those never fail. still does not solve the intractable problem of not getting caught.

 

[CAPTCHATHIS]

yes! everybody has and it self debunking...
it has some major flaws ..
like getting caught. hauling up the several hundred pounds of thermite. working in confined spaces having to cut holes in every conceivable point of attachment. thousands of feet of det cord or receivers that would very likely be activated by a stray signal. etc..
you want to talk probabilities?
the odds against pulling that off successfully are nearly incalculable.
the "domino effect" from using planes as missiles thousands of time better than chance which is 50/50 ...

Not to mention the fact that the whole demo system would have to have survived hours of - drum roll, please - "CHAOTIC FIRES."
The entire controlled demo scenario is absurd.

as compared to controlled fires?

One of our CTs described the 9/11 fires as "chaotic," thus the quotation marks.

The fires would have been part of the theater, they were staged and under control, just as the damage from the alleged airliner crash was a controlled special effect. 9/11/2001 was a made for TV drama.

thanks again for showcasing your ignorance.
I have spent my entire adult life in the theatre and movie biz,based on that experience I can state unequivocally you don't know dick about what would be involved in faking it !
heres an easy one: IT would take a crew of 1000 fx techs 500 riggers 300 painters and an unknown numbers of "stage techs " to fake it..

I'll give you that. You are certainly an "expert" when it comes to "faking it"

 

[daws101]

Not to mention the fact that the whole demo system would have to have survived hours of - drum roll, please - "CHAOTIC FIRES."
The entire controlled demo scenario is absurd.

as compared to controlled fires?

One of our CTs described the 9/11 fires as "chaotic," thus the quotation marks.

The fires would have been part of the theater, they were staged and under control, just as the damage from the alleged airliner crash was a controlled special effect. 9/11/2001 was a made for TV drama.

thanks again for showcasing your ignorance.
I have spent my entire adult life in the theatre and movie biz,based on that experience I can state unequivocally you don't know dick about what would be involved in faking it !
heres an easy one: IT would take a crew of 1000 fx techs 500 riggers 300 painters and an unknown numbers of "stage techs " to fake it..

I'll give you that. You are certainly an "expert" when it comes to "faking it"

you just keep telling yourself that.

 

[n0spam4me]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

 

[n0spam4me]

as to the frame speed 2.25 sec = 60 frames the .25 is 1/4 of a sec = 1 quarter frame for all practical purposes it's useless

exactly what is this suppose to express? Please clarify.

 

[SAYIT]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

 

[n0spam4me]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

 

[SAYIT]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

Look into my eyes ... I shall not play your oh so silly little game. Rational peeps like Skylar (and others) tried to reason with you (and others) on dozens of other threads here, all with the same result: you pretend your silliness has not been debunked and continue to bury your head in your little rabbit hole. When last seen, you had added another layer of players to your CT, bringing the total number of co-conspirators to around 205 million yet not one has written a book detailing his part, not one has done the talk show circuit and not one has gotten drunk and inadvertently spilled the beans. Not one.

 

[n0spam4me]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

Look into my eyes ... I shall not play your oh so silly little game. Rational peeps like Skylar (and others) tried to reason with you (and others) on dozens of other threads here, all with the same result: you pretend your silliness has not been debunked and continue to bury your head in your little rabbit hole. When last seen, you had added another layer of players to your CT, bringing the total number of co-conspirators to around 205 million yet not one has written a book detailing his part, not one has done the talk show circuit and not one has gotten drunk and inadvertently spilled the beans. Not one.

its ever so easy to claim that its all been debunked a long time ago and therefore its redundant to bring it up again..... HOWEVER, the "debunking" really wasn't and the fall of WTC7 is still a huge smoking gun.

 

[SAYIT]

the intractable problem of not getting caught.

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

Look into my eyes ... I shall not play your oh so silly little game. Rational peeps like Skylar (and others) tried to reason with you (and others) on dozens of other threads here, all with the same result: you pretend your silliness has not been debunked and continue to bury your head in your little rabbit hole. When last seen, you had added another layer of players to your CT, bringing the total number of co-conspirators to around 205 million yet not one has written a book detailing his part, not one has done the talk show circuit and not one has gotten drunk and inadvertently spilled the beans. Not one.

its ever so easy to claim that its all been debunked a long time ago and therefore its redundant to bring it up again..... HOWEVER, the "debunking" really wasn't and the fall of WTC7 is still a huge smoking gun.

You are, as Jonathon Kay notes, the last of a "dying breed." It's over, Princess, and somewhere deep down inside you must know it.

Jonathan Kay 9 11 truther Richard Gage is a preacher to a dying breed National Post

 

[n0spam4me]

If you just happen to have the "security" company in your hip pocket, ..... kinda makes a difference .... also, on the excuse of working on the phone wiring, or the plumbing or anything at all to do with the building, there could have been armies of tradespeople all over the place and they would do what they do under the guise of re-routing wiring or checking for plumbing leaks and the office minions would be none the wiser. Some would speculate as to how much disruption of the building would need to have been done in order to rig it for demolition. Note that in the case of the towers, there were many floors with no offices at all and the demolition rigging ninjas would have a totally free space to do whatever needed to be done. However, speculation is rather fruitless, what we have as a sure thing is the total destruction of both towers after they fell straight down and at 64% of the acceleration of gravity. That fact alone is HUGE evidence!

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

Look into my eyes ... I shall not play your oh so silly little game. Rational peeps like Skylar (and others) tried to reason with you (and others) on dozens of other threads here, all with the same result: you pretend your silliness has not been debunked and continue to bury your head in your little rabbit hole. When last seen, you had added another layer of players to your CT, bringing the total number of co-conspirators to around 205 million yet not one has written a book detailing his part, not one has done the talk show circuit and not one has gotten drunk and inadvertently spilled the beans. Not one.

its ever so easy to claim that its all been debunked a long time ago and therefore its redundant to bring it up again..... HOWEVER, the "debunking" really wasn't and the fall of WTC7 is still a huge smoking gun.

You are, as Jonathon Kay notes, the last of a "dying breed." It's over, Princess, and somewhere deep down inside you must know it.

Jonathan Kay 9 11 truther Richard Gage is a preacher to a dying breed National Post

There is a VERY serious problem here, you see .... the FACTS,
that is the actual physics of what happened, the alleged airliner crashes, the buildings falling down, the total media flim-flam show..... give me a break, it may be possible to play the emotional card and actually "convert" some of the truthers to the dark side, but that isn't really what this whole thing is about. YOU that is YOU personally get to wherever it is that you get to to think, that meditate under a tree, or whatever and think about what is going on and the sort of warfare that is being practiced by the side that is promoting the 19 suicidal hijackers story.
and really, I do not expect people to return to any forum on-line and say
"Hey..... I've seen the light" or something .... doesn't happen like that but everybody needs to be able to deep in their own hearts, know what side they are on and know that a time will come when you will need to act upon what you know, and make decisions based upon what you know.
Galileo said "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."

So THINK
damnit!

 

[SAYIT]

Once again your CT grows and grows like an out-of-control Chia Pet. Yours has now reached the point where there are more co-conspirators than uninvolved bystanders yet fully 13 years after 9/11 not one of the hundreds of millions of perpetrators has whispered a word. Amazing!

Question for you, can you explain why Both towers, "collapsed" down at 64% of the acceleration of gravity? and WTC7 "collapsed" at full free fall acceleration for 2.25 sec.....? and these events were supposed to be the results of fire + aircraft crashes?

The mainstream media was the first to assert the 19 suicidal hijackers story and so far, they have not supported it with hard evidence.

Look into my eyes ... I shall not play your oh so silly little game. Rational peeps like Skylar (and others) tried to reason with you (and others) on dozens of other threads here, all with the same result: you pretend your silliness has not been debunked and continue to bury your head in your little rabbit hole. When last seen, you had added another layer of players to your CT, bringing the total number of co-conspirators to around 205 million yet not one has written a book detailing his part, not one has done the talk show circuit and not one has gotten drunk and inadvertently spilled the beans. Not one.

its ever so easy to claim that its all been debunked a long time ago and therefore its redundant to bring it up again..... HOWEVER, the "debunking" really wasn't and the fall of WTC7 is still a huge smoking gun.

You are, as Jonathon Kay notes, the last of a "dying breed." It's over, Princess, and somewhere deep down inside you must know it.

Jonathan Kay 9 11 truther Richard Gage is a preacher to a dying breed National Post

There is a VERY serious problem here, you see .... the FACTS...

Unfortunately there is nothing factual about your insistence that "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and "the fires were staged and controlled." It's just bullshit you pull outta your ass and it's the kind of bullshit that - according to the 9/11 CT Movement," - has destroyed what little credibility the Movement may have had.
I thank you for a job well done. You're dismissed.

 

[n0spam4me]

as to the frame speed 2.25 sec = 60 frames the .25 is 1/4 of a sec = 1 quarter frame for all practical purposes it's useless

exactly what is this suppose to express? Please clarify.

In the absents of an explanation, I can only conclude that somebody was just blowing smoke ...... oh well .....