It never makes any sense to me..Don't liberals want to be educated on their choices on who is running for president, who cares if the information came from our press or from foreginers ..
Don't you want the information?
If not why?
It wasn't corrupt. In any organization there are private conversations. You don't want anyone to see all those porn links you have, do you?
But the left media reported on Trump ***** grabbing..why didn't the left media report on Hillary's corruption?
Why did Russia have to do our medias job? Why does this upset you?
.
Ah, good question: But the left media reported on Trump ***** grabbing..why didn't the left media report on Hillary's corruption?
Think about the Clinton Foundation and the Trump Foundation. Remember the investigation? The House investigators, the Senate investigators, the FBI, every news media in the world and even the CIA looked at foreign connections. And still they didn't find anything. All the reporters kept saying with all that smoke, there must be fire, only they couldn't find any fire.
But a single reporter looked into the Trump Foundation and won the Pulitzer Prize for reporting. So you assume since they didn't report on the assumed Clinton corruption, they must not have looked. The truth is, with all that investigation, she was clearly the most vetted candidate in US history. With all those reporters looking into Clinton's affairs, if there had been some there there, they would have reported it.
Investigation of Trump’s charity wins Pulitzer Prize