Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 16,059
- 5,538
- 210
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty stupid comments. The entities that did the firings are well within their rights to fire those who voiced anything but shock and outrage over this senseless act of violence. They should have learned the lesson; the hate you put out in the world eventually makes it back to you.
Its ironic that the right wing loons who decried such firings in the past are now all for them though. Once again proving that they don’t have principles...they have hobbies.
scores of terrorist more than likely crossed our borders illegally during the Bidens open border admin ..Why don't you ask your boy & Patel why they disbanded the FBI Domestic Terrorism Task Force?
That's how concerned your heroes are about domestic terrorism.
******* mutants
Doesn't even know what propaganda is
The fed ex store kids printed it for them for free
They're not gonna have jobs
A 2A right is a right that guaranteed to all. At least until AFTER they use it against an innocent person. But it takes that action for their rights to be taken away.
For the most part, freedom of speech only applies to the government. There are arguments for applying it to social media due to the "public square" concept, which I somewhat agree with, but most of the purpose behind free speech is to prevent government censorship.Uh, no, thats not what he was saying at all.
And freedom of speech does mean you should be free from consequence, otherwise its not free. As ive stated before, freedom of speech means you should be able to say the most vile of things, even those who say these things about kirk. Thats just how freedom of speech works. If there are consequences attached to it, then we dont have freedom of speech.
As much as it makes these people pieces of shit, they had the right to say what they said.
All these leftists getting fired is like America's toilet getting flushed.
For the most part, freedom of speech only applies to the government. There are arguments for applying it to social media due to the "public square" concept, which I somewhat agree with, but most of the purpose behind free speech is to prevent government censorship.
That being said, we found out that, during the COVID chaos, the government pushed social media platforms to censor people. That should be considered unconstitutional.
If an employer wants to fire someone over a political view or something objectionable, then that's not covered by the First Amendment.