Another hot month in a La Nina

[CrusaderFrank]

The IPCC redistributes wealth through climate "science", no sane, rational, scientific person takes them seriously. The IPCC is the biggest fraud since the Piltdown Man

 

[fncceo]

I know a hot Nina

 

[Old Rocks]

so what?? you have an air conditioner, don't you?

Typical really stupid. But the forests do not. Millions of acres burned this summer and the fire season is not over. And enough people in the Pacific Northwest did not that we lost several hundred people in Oregon, Washington and British Columbia to a heat spell that saw 116 in Portland, Oregon, and 121 in Lytton, BC.

 

[Old Rocks]

Like I said... This is far from settled. We are just started to get past the bias that is preventing honest dialogue and debate.

This was settled in 1859. That you are so ignorant is your problem.

 

[ding]

This was settled in 1859. That you are so ignorant is your problem.

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider.

The panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports.

In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.

Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.

 

[Old Rocks]

Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider.

The panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports.

In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.

Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

 

[marvin martian]

August exceeds the temperature of most of the months in the satellite data dating to 1979;

View attachment 534141

UAH Global Temperature Update for August, 2021:+0.17 deg. C.

The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for August, 2021 was +0.17 deg. C, down slightly from the July, 2021 value of +0.20 deg. C. The linear warming trend since…

iowaclimate.org

Wow, 1979! That's like 0.000000000000000000000000001% of the planet's history. What are we going to do!!!

 

[ding]

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

Again... this proves there's no consensus and explains why.

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

​

The panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports.​

​

In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.​

​

​

​

​

​

Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.​

So unless you can show that the rural data set doesn't look like this or that the IPCC didn't only use the low variability data set for TSI or that the authors contention that different conclusions can be reached depending upon what data set is used, then there is no consensus on the cause of the current warming trend.

 

[Crick]

You've gotten that graphic locked into your clipboard, haven't you.

 

[Orangecat]

August exceeds the temperature of most of the months in the satellite data dating to 1979;

View attachment 534141

UAH Global Temperature Update for August, 2021:+0.17 deg. C.

The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for August, 2021 was +0.17 deg. C, down slightly from the July, 2021 value of +0.20 deg. C. The linear warming trend since…

iowaclimate.org

If I'm reading that graph correctly, the average temperature has gone up about 1/2 of a degree in 40 years? Is this supposed to inspire panic?