Another Example of NOAA Rewriting Temperature History

[IanC]

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Who else will do it and maintain a huge network to even attempt to do it. I am not saying I approve of such cooling if it is infact true...Just defending them and hoping for some honest leadership in the future.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I support the noaa and the function it does, but if this is true....Well, some asses need to go to prison and a new government needs to install new leadership!

 

[IanC]

Matthew- almost a year ago there was a big flap about a station in Texas, which then led to a bigger flap about estimated measurements replacing actual measurements and the presence of Zombie stations that no longer report any measurements but are kept on the books and influence the records through fabricated results. At the time local and national figures from various temperature collection agencies said they would respond with clear explanations. eleven months later and nothing. do you think they will produce an explanation? the odd homogenization results for Reykjavik were another case in which an explanation was promised but not forthcoming.

is it OK to run the clock out on every question? simply wait until a new version comes out and then say the whole thing is irrelevant? actually they dont even say that, they just ignore requests for explanations and after a few reminders just point to their webpage.

 

[IanC]

I support the noaa and the function it does, but if this is true....Well, some asses need to go to prison and a new government needs to install new leadership!

dont you just say a variation of that every time I post up a serious question about NOAA or GISS or BEST or HadCRU? and because there is never any resolution, you simply reset until the next example comes up.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Matthew- almost a year ago there was a big flap about a station in Texas, which then led to a bigger flap about estimated measurements replacing actual measurements and the presence of Zombie stations that no longer report any measurements but are kept on the books and influence the records through fabricated results. At the time local and national figures from various temperature collection agencies said they would respond with clear explanations. eleven months later and nothing. do you think they will produce an explanation? the odd homogenization results for Reykjavik were another case in which an explanation was promised but not forthcoming.

is it OK to run the clock out on every question? simply wait until a new version comes out and then say the whole thing is irrelevant? actually they dont even say that, they just ignore requests for explanations and after a few reminders just point to their webpage.

If they're playing with the data to get the results to match a political agenda. Let me state very clearly that it wouldn't be ok and in fact I believe that it would be far worse then NOT ok as they should be arrested and charged with fraud on the American people. This nation needs accountability very badly and needs to get back to being honest with the American people if what you say is going on.

They need to produce these explanations...I say this as a supporter of the noaa, nws and all that they do.

 

[IanC]

Matthew- almost a year ago there was a big flap about a station in Texas, which then led to a bigger flap about estimated measurements replacing actual measurements and the presence of Zombie stations that no longer report any measurements but are kept on the books and influence the records through fabricated results. At the time local and national figures from various temperature collection agencies said they would respond with clear explanations. eleven months later and nothing. do you think they will produce an explanation? the odd homogenization results for Reykjavik were another case in which an explanation was promised but not forthcoming.

is it OK to run the clock out on every question? simply wait until a new version comes out and then say the whole thing is irrelevant? actually they dont even say that, they just ignore requests for explanations and after a few reminders just point to their webpage.

If they're playing with the data to get the results to match a political agenda. Let me state very clearly that it wouldn't be ok and in fact I believe that it would be far worse then NOT ok as they should be arrested and charged with fraud on the American people. This nation needs accountability very badly and needs to get back to being honest with the American people if what you say is going on.

They need to produce these explanations...I say this as a supporter of the noaa, nws and all that they do.

I think we should worry about fixing the datasets before focussing on arresting people for fraud.

hopefully the GWPF will be able to present more than enough areas of concern to get the investigative ball rolling.

 

[cnm]

I think we should worry about fixing the datasets before focussing on arresting people for fraud.

Perhaps they can be rewritten.

 

[IanC]

I think we should worry about fixing the datasets before focussing on arresting people for fraud.

Perhaps they can be rewritten.

an attempt at humour? somehow it seems off the mark.

 

[cnm]

Irony.

 

[orogenicman]

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

Brakey Energy Mike Brakey

Mike Brakey is regarded as the foremost expert on Ohio’s energy environment and FirstEnergy-Ohio rates. He is a frequent speaker on energy issues and is often consulted by the media on Ohio energy topics.

Mike is an engineer who developed an expert-level understanding of Ohio’s energy rates and regulations as energy management director and facilities engineering director at Johnson Rubber, a large Ohio polymer manufacturer. In his 22 years at Johnson Rubber Company, Mike directed the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies that led to energy cost reductions in excess of $20 million.

Mike founded Brakey Energy in 1999. He holds 7 worldwide patents for the design of more efficient heat exchangers for marine applications. He also has developed proprietary rate analysis software for helping Brakey Energy clients evaluate and reduce their energy costs.

Mike holds a B.S. in engineering physics from the University of Maine and an E.M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace College (a private religious college). In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer.

In other words, he has only a B.S. level of college science education, and no education or experience in climatology, and works for a rubber manufacturer. Also, I checked with the Francis Crowe Society, and according to them, He was NOT given any sort of recognition in 2013 -

The University of Maine - UMaine News - Six to be Inducted into Francis Crowe Society

In the (2013) Distinguished Engineer category, inductees are:

Paul Durocher, class of 1982, Chemical and Biological Engineering
David Kinney, class of 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
William Pike, class of 1980, Engineering Physics
Scot MacDonald, class of 1990, School of Engineering Technology

Gee, Mike isn't listed. Imagine that.

About Pierre Gosselin

Pierre L. Gosselin received an Associate Degree in Civil Engineering at Vermont Technical College and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Now I live in Europe and help my wife, the owner, run a small business that provides communication services for business and industry who deliver cutting-edge products, technology and services to market and thus make our lives immensely better.

In other words, he is not a scientist either, and has no expertise in climate science nor an educational background in the climate science.

You people keep pulling these clowns out of your arses and expert us to not notice, and not to laugh in your faces about it. Guess what...?

 

[IanC]

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

Brakey Energy Mike Brakey

Mike Brakey is regarded as the foremost expert on Ohio’s energy environment and FirstEnergy-Ohio rates. He is a frequent speaker on energy issues and is often consulted by the media on Ohio energy topics.

Mike is an engineer who developed an expert-level understanding of Ohio’s energy rates and regulations as energy management director and facilities engineering director at Johnson Rubber, a large Ohio polymer manufacturer. In his 22 years at Johnson Rubber Company, Mike directed the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies that led to energy cost reductions in excess of $20 million.

Mike founded Brakey Energy in 1999. He holds 7 worldwide patents for the design of more efficient heat exchangers for marine applications. He also has developed proprietary rate analysis software for helping Brakey Energy clients evaluate and reduce their energy costs.

Mike holds a B.S. in engineering physics from the University of Maine and an E.M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace College (a private religious college). In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer.

In other words, he has only a B.S. level of college science education, and no education or experience in climatology, and works for a rubber manufacturer. Also, I checked with the Francis Crowe Society, and according to them, He was NOT given any sort of recognition in 2013 -

The University of Maine - UMaine News - Six to be Inducted into Francis Crowe Society

In the (2013) Distinguished Engineer category, inductees are:

Paul Durocher, class of 1982, Chemical and Biological Engineering
David Kinney, class of 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
William Pike, class of 1980, Engineering Physics
Scot MacDonald, class of 1990, School of Engineering Technology

Gee, Mike isn't listed. Imagine that.

About Pierre Gosselin

Pierre L. Gosselin received an Associate Degree in Civil Engineering at Vermont Technical College and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Now I live in Europe and help my wife, the owner, run a small business that provides communication services for business and industry who deliver cutting-edge products, technology and services to market and thus make our lives immensely better.

In other words, he is not a scientist either, and has no expertise in climate science nor an educational background in the climate science.

You people keep pulling these clowns out of your arses and expert us to not notice, and not to laugh in your faces about it. Guess what...?

hahahaha. there you go again. trying to trash someone's reputation rather than debate the issue.

does he have a B.S. in Engineering Physics? yes.

did he work in industry before starting his own company? yes.

is it the type of company that would use just the types of temperature data that he is talking about? yes.

do you believe that he kept an archived copy of temperature data? wouldnt you have to be some sort of accountant to bother with details like that?

oh wait!!!! he does have a degree in accounting. I guess that means he is capable of graphing up two versions of temperature data and pointing out the differences, eh?





oh, and one more thing. could you explain this?

I dont suppose they told him about the award in '13, and then had the ceremony in '14? couldnt be, because YOU checked with Francis Crowe Society and they said they never awarded a Distinguished Engineer honour to Brakey. isnt that what you said?

 

[cnm]

Perhaps his research and calculations will now be more accurate with revised figures.

 

[IanC]

Perhaps his research and calculations will now be more accurate with revised figures.

Sure, it's possible. Give us the reasons why the figures were adjusted, and why they were done in the various amounts. That is what we have been asking for years. Odd numbers spit out of a black box algorithm don't inspire a lot of confidence.

 

[orogenicman]

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

Brakey Energy Mike Brakey

Mike Brakey is regarded as the foremost expert on Ohio’s energy environment and FirstEnergy-Ohio rates. He is a frequent speaker on energy issues and is often consulted by the media on Ohio energy topics.

Mike is an engineer who developed an expert-level understanding of Ohio’s energy rates and regulations as energy management director and facilities engineering director at Johnson Rubber, a large Ohio polymer manufacturer. In his 22 years at Johnson Rubber Company, Mike directed the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies that led to energy cost reductions in excess of $20 million.

Mike founded Brakey Energy in 1999. He holds 7 worldwide patents for the design of more efficient heat exchangers for marine applications. He also has developed proprietary rate analysis software for helping Brakey Energy clients evaluate and reduce their energy costs.

Mike holds a B.S. in engineering physics from the University of Maine and an E.M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace College (a private religious college). In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer.

In other words, he has only a B.S. level of college science education, and no education or experience in climatology, and works for a rubber manufacturer. Also, I checked with the Francis Crowe Society, and according to them, He was NOT given any sort of recognition in 2013 -

The University of Maine - UMaine News - Six to be Inducted into Francis Crowe Society

In the (2013) Distinguished Engineer category, inductees are:

Paul Durocher, class of 1982, Chemical and Biological Engineering
David Kinney, class of 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
William Pike, class of 1980, Engineering Physics
Scot MacDonald, class of 1990, School of Engineering Technology

Gee, Mike isn't listed. Imagine that.

About Pierre Gosselin

Pierre L. Gosselin received an Associate Degree in Civil Engineering at Vermont Technical College and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Now I live in Europe and help my wife, the owner, run a small business that provides communication services for business and industry who deliver cutting-edge products, technology and services to market and thus make our lives immensely better.

In other words, he is not a scientist either, and has no expertise in climate science nor an educational background in the climate science.

You people keep pulling these clowns out of your arses and expert us to not notice, and not to laugh in your faces about it. Guess what...?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.


hahahaha. there you go again. trying to trash someone's reputation rather than debate the issue.

does he have a B.S. in Engineering Physics? yes.

Before I can trash someone's reputation in climate science, they have to actually have a reputation IN CLIMATE SCIENCE.

Engineering physics is not a field that is relevant to climate science.

did he work in industry before starting his own company? yes.

Not relevant to climate science.

is it the type of company that would use just the types of temperature data that he is talking about? yes.

Evidence...

do you believe that he kept an archived copy of temperature data? wouldnt you have to be some sort of accountant to bother with details like that?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh wait!!!! he does have a degree in accounting. I guess that means he is capable of graphing up two versions of temperature data and pointing out the differences, eh?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh, and one more thing. could you explain this?

Yes, he apparently lied when he said that he received the award in 2013.

dont suppose they told him about the award in '13, and then had the ceremony in '14? couldnt be, because YOU checked with Francis Crowe Society and they said they never awarded a Distinguished Engineer honour to Brakey. isnt that what you said?

Yes, according to the UIniversity of Maine, he was not on the list of people who received the award in 2013. according to his own background remarks, he received the award in 2013, not 2014.

"In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer". Except that they didn't recognize him in 2013. He is not on their list for that year.

 

[IanC]

what the **** is wrong with you????????

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

Brakey Energy Mike Brakey

Mike Brakey is regarded as the foremost expert on Ohio’s energy environment and FirstEnergy-Ohio rates. He is a frequent speaker on energy issues and is often consulted by the media on Ohio energy topics.

Mike is an engineer who developed an expert-level understanding of Ohio’s energy rates and regulations as energy management director and facilities engineering director at Johnson Rubber, a large Ohio polymer manufacturer. In his 22 years at Johnson Rubber Company, Mike directed the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies that led to energy cost reductions in excess of $20 million.

Mike founded Brakey Energy in 1999. He holds 7 worldwide patents for the design of more efficient heat exchangers for marine applications. He also has developed proprietary rate analysis software for helping Brakey Energy clients evaluate and reduce their energy costs.

Mike holds a B.S. in engineering physics from the University of Maine and an E.M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace College (a private religious college). In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer.

In other words, he has only a B.S. level of college science education, and no education or experience in climatology, and works for a rubber manufacturer. Also, I checked with the Francis Crowe Society, and according to them, He was NOT given any sort of recognition in 2013 -

The University of Maine - UMaine News - Six to be Inducted into Francis Crowe Society

In the (2013) Distinguished Engineer category, inductees are:

Paul Durocher, class of 1982, Chemical and Biological Engineering
David Kinney, class of 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
William Pike, class of 1980, Engineering Physics
Scot MacDonald, class of 1990, School of Engineering Technology

Gee, Mike isn't listed. Imagine that.

About Pierre Gosselin

Pierre L. Gosselin received an Associate Degree in Civil Engineering at Vermont Technical College and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Now I live in Europe and help my wife, the owner, run a small business that provides communication services for business and industry who deliver cutting-edge products, technology and services to market and thus make our lives immensely better.

In other words, he is not a scientist either, and has no expertise in climate science nor an educational background in the climate science.

You people keep pulling these clowns out of your arses and expert us to not notice, and not to laugh in your faces about it. Guess what...?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.


hahahaha. there you go again. trying to trash someone's reputation rather than debate the issue.

does he have a B.S. in Engineering Physics? yes.

Before I can trash someone's reputation in climate science, they have to actually have a reputation IN CLIMATE SCIENCE.

Engineering physics is not a field that is relevant to climate science.

did he work in industry before starting his own company? yes.

Not relevant to climate science.

is it the type of company that would use just the types of temperature data that he is talking about? yes.

Evidence...

do you believe that he kept an archived copy of temperature data? wouldnt you have to be some sort of accountant to bother with details like that?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh wait!!!! he does have a degree in accounting. I guess that means he is capable of graphing up two versions of temperature data and pointing out the differences, eh?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh, and one more thing. could you explain this?

Yes, he apparently lied when he said that he received the award in 2013.

dont suppose they told him about the award in '13, and then had the ceremony in '14? couldnt be, because YOU checked with Francis Crowe Society and they said they never awarded a Distinguished Engineer honour to Brakey. isnt that what you said?

Yes, according to the UIniversity of Maine, he was not on the list of people who received the award in 2013. according to his own background remarks, he received the award in 2013, not 2014.

"In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer". Except that they didn't recognize him in 2013. He is not on their list for that year.

are you denying that the temp data has NOT been changed? are you denying that Brakey's work in planning energy consumption has NOT been made more difficult by obscuring past trends in temperature?

why would he have to be a 'climate scientist' to notice fiddled data?

 

[jon_berzerk]

Matthew- almost a year ago there was a big flap about a station in Texas, which then led to a bigger flap about estimated measurements replacing actual measurements and the presence of Zombie stations that no longer report any measurements but are kept on the books and influence the records through fabricated results. At the time local and national figures from various temperature collection agencies said they would respond with clear explanations. eleven months later and nothing. do you think they will produce an explanation? the odd homogenization results for Reykjavik were another case in which an explanation was promised but not forthcoming.

is it OK to run the clock out on every question? simply wait until a new version comes out and then say the whole thing is irrelevant? actually they dont even say that, they just ignore requests for explanations and after a few reminders just point to their webpage.

If they're playing with the data to get the results to match a political agenda. Let me state very clearly that it wouldn't be ok and in fact I believe that it would be far worse then NOT ok as they should be arrested and charged with fraud on the American people. This nation needs accountability very badly and needs to get back to being honest with the American people if what you say is going on.

They need to produce these explanations...I say this as a supporter of the noaa, nws and all that they do.

it certainly is not ok

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The data set was a DENIER! and had to be adjusted, that how Climate "Science" works

 

[orogenicman]

what the **** is wrong with you????????

NOAA cooled the years of Lewiston-Auburn Maine’s past by an accumulated 151°F! (55,188 heating degree day units). - See more at: NoTricksZone Not here to worship what is known but to question it Jacob Bronowski. Climate news from Germany in English by Pierre L. Gosselin

They assumed no one would archive temperature data. But I did. My research indicated they used the same algorithm across the United States at the same time. Fortunately I had archived their data from 2013 for Maine and recently compared it to their 2015 data (see above table).

As an engineering physicist and heat transfer specialist, I have worked with heating and cooling degree days for forty years. It is alarming when one discovers multi-million dollar websites have been corrupted with bogus data because the facts do not match up with agendas.

this brings up a point I have made numerous times over the last five years. when you do a research paper, do you have to make perfectly clear which years's version you are using? because the 'facts and figures' change over and over again.

Brakey Energy Mike Brakey

Mike Brakey is regarded as the foremost expert on Ohio’s energy environment and FirstEnergy-Ohio rates. He is a frequent speaker on energy issues and is often consulted by the media on Ohio energy topics.

Mike is an engineer who developed an expert-level understanding of Ohio’s energy rates and regulations as energy management director and facilities engineering director at Johnson Rubber, a large Ohio polymer manufacturer. In his 22 years at Johnson Rubber Company, Mike directed the development and implementation of manufacturing strategies that led to energy cost reductions in excess of $20 million.

Mike founded Brakey Energy in 1999. He holds 7 worldwide patents for the design of more efficient heat exchangers for marine applications. He also has developed proprietary rate analysis software for helping Brakey Energy clients evaluate and reduce their energy costs.

Mike holds a B.S. in engineering physics from the University of Maine and an E.M.B.A. from Baldwin-Wallace College (a private religious college). In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer.

In other words, he has only a B.S. level of college science education, and no education or experience in climatology, and works for a rubber manufacturer. Also, I checked with the Francis Crowe Society, and according to them, He was NOT given any sort of recognition in 2013 -

The University of Maine - UMaine News - Six to be Inducted into Francis Crowe Society

In the (2013) Distinguished Engineer category, inductees are:

Paul Durocher, class of 1982, Chemical and Biological Engineering
David Kinney, class of 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
William Pike, class of 1980, Engineering Physics
Scot MacDonald, class of 1990, School of Engineering Technology

Gee, Mike isn't listed. Imagine that.

About Pierre Gosselin

Pierre L. Gosselin received an Associate Degree in Civil Engineering at Vermont Technical College and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Now I live in Europe and help my wife, the owner, run a small business that provides communication services for business and industry who deliver cutting-edge products, technology and services to market and thus make our lives immensely better.

In other words, he is not a scientist either, and has no expertise in climate science nor an educational background in the climate science.

You people keep pulling these clowns out of your arses and expert us to not notice, and not to laugh in your faces about it. Guess what...?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.


hahahaha. there you go again. trying to trash someone's reputation rather than debate the issue.

does he have a B.S. in Engineering Physics? yes.

Before I can trash someone's reputation in climate science, they have to actually have a reputation IN CLIMATE SCIENCE.

Engineering physics is not a field that is relevant to climate science.

did he work in industry before starting his own company? yes.

Not relevant to climate science.

is it the type of company that would use just the types of temperature data that he is talking about? yes.

Evidence...

do you believe that he kept an archived copy of temperature data? wouldnt you have to be some sort of accountant to bother with details like that?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh wait!!!! he does have a degree in accounting. I guess that means he is capable of graphing up two versions of temperature data and pointing out the differences, eh?

So what you are saying is that if I want someone to do my taxes, I should contact Mike. I'll keep that in mind.

oh, and one more thing. could you explain this?

Yes, he apparently lied when he said that he received the award in 2013.

dont suppose they told him about the award in '13, and then had the ceremony in '14? couldnt be, because YOU checked with Francis Crowe Society and they said they never awarded a Distinguished Engineer honour to Brakey. isnt that what you said?

Yes, according to the UIniversity of Maine, he was not on the list of people who received the award in 2013. according to his own background remarks, he received the award in 2013, not 2014.

"In 2013, the University of Maine’s prestigious Francis Crowe Society recognized Mike as a Distinguished Engineer". Except that they didn't recognize him in 2013. He is not on their list for that year.

are you denying that the temp data has NOT been changed? are you denying that Brakey's work in planning energy consumption has NOT been made more difficult by obscuring past trends in temperature?

why would he have to be a 'climate scientist' to notice fiddled data?

Calibrating temperature data is not an unusual thing to do. All data has to be calibrated to be useful.

 

[cnm]

are you denying that Brakey's work in planning energy consumption has NOT been made more difficult by obscuring past trends in temperature?

Perhaps it has been made better, at no direct cost to himself.