Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What about Mark Foley?
Mark Foley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Foley resigned from Congress on September 29, 2006 acting on a request by the Republican Leadership after allegations surfaced that he had sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages[1] to underage males who had formerly served and were at that time serving as Congressional pages.[2][3
Is anybody getting it how ignorant it is to post this kind of shit and then say it has something to do with being "republican" or "democrat"?
What about Mark Foley?
Mark Foley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Foley resigned from Congress on September 29, 2006 acting on a request by the Republican Leadership after allegations surfaced that he had sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages[1] to underage males who had formerly served and were at that time serving as Congressional pages.[2][3
Is anybody getting it how ignorant it is to post this kind of shit and then say it has something to do with being "republican" or "democrat"?
The point is democrats are getting arrested for all kinds of things, and they usally defend this shit.....i just think its funny your fitst reaction was to compare this guy to larry craig, which they hate and is always a liberal fallback, but this time it bit you in the ass
He has a "wide" stance.
There is a long list of right wing perverts. Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick. Does that mean that all republicans do that?
trolling for dick is perverted?
i mean this kind of thing is supposed to be just as normal as straight sex according to the Left
are you some kind of homophobe leftard?
that makes you a hypocrite too
and you know what they say about homophobes.
great post, did he just equate homos with pedophiles? I do that and the left scoffs, but now they use it as a defense, ive always said liberals argue in a vacuum.
They dont care if their arguments are consistant at all
"Great Post"? Really? That is what gets you mentally stimulated? Nobody said anything about "pedophiles". Is that some kind of pet subject that is just on your mind?
It isn't "the Left", the made up liberal strawman, that is scoffing at you. When you called homosexuals "homos" and equated them to pedophiles, then that is homophobic behavior. Larry Craig was a homophobe also.
you said it was perverted. what makes it perverted? anonomous sex is very common in the gay community. i thought you morons didnt judge people?
dont try to back out of it now blues-tard
ur a joke
So you want to skip over the part where you interjected "pedophile" into the discussion?
Also, I already directly answered the question about what was perverted. He was an old married republican family man who was a champion against the gay community and the was secretly looking for sex in the men's bathroom. If you think that is normal, then fine. I won't argue with your values.
However, I would like to know why you brought up "pedophiles". Please share your reasoning with the group on that one.
you said it was perverted. what makes it perverted? anonomous sex is very common in the gay community. i thought you morons didnt judge people?
dont try to back out of it now blues-tard
ur a joke
So you want to skip over the part where you interjected "pedophile" into the discussion?
Also, I already directly answered the question about what was perverted. He was an old married republican family man who was a champion against the gay community and the was secretly looking for sex in the men's bathroom. If you think that is normal, then fine. I won't argue with your values.
However, I would like to know why you brought up "pedophiles". Please share your reasoning with the group on that one.
Do you liberals know how to read, or is that tough like voting machines and the internet?
If you did, can you tell me what it was about? Maybe the link will give you a clue.
So you posted a response that used Larry Craig as a defense...again you're trying to change the subject and I wont let you
Larry Craig= Homo
Article=pedophile
you compared the two....which to me they are similar, although pedophile is worse, but they are both sexual perversions, the funny thing is you would dispute that, yet you just compared the two like they were similar.........game, set, match!
He has a "wide" stance.
I think that will be OK. Just don't call him a "pervert" or you will set some people off. We already established that it does not fit in with right wing political correctness to call him a "pervert". Besides, what is wrong with having a "wide stance" and then going down to the police station and pleading guilty? That is just normal stuff. Happens all the time.
you said it was perverted. what makes it perverted? anonomous sex is very common in the gay community. i thought you morons didnt judge people?
dont try to back out of it now blues-tard
ur a joke
So you want to skip over the part where you interjected "pedophile" into the discussion?
Also, I already directly answered the question about what was perverted. He was an old married republican family man who was a champion against the gay community and the was secretly looking for sex in the men's bathroom. If you think that is normal, then fine. I won't argue with your values.
However, I would like to know why you brought up "pedophiles". Please share your reasoning with the group on that one.
Do you liberals know how to read, or is that tough like voting machines and the internet?
If you did, can you tell me what it was about? Maybe the link will give you a clue.
So you posted a response that used Larry Craig as a defense...again you're trying to change the subject and I wont let you
Larry Craig= Homo
Article=pedophile
you compared the two....which to me they are similar, although pedophile is worse, but they are both sexual perversions, the funny thing is you would dispute that, yet you just compared the two like they were similar.........game, set, match!
What about Mark Foley?
Mark Foley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Foley resigned from Congress on September 29, 2006 acting on a request by the Republican Leadership after allegations surfaced that he had sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages[1] to underage males who had formerly served and were at that time serving as Congressional pages.[2][3
Is anybody getting it how ignorant it is to post this kind of shit and then say it has something to do with being "republican" or "democrat"?
The point is democrats are getting arrested for all kinds of things, and they usally defend this shit.....i just think its funny your fitst reaction was to compare this guy to larry craig, which they hate and is always a liberal fallback, but this time it bit you in the ass
You are not making any sense. You quoted me saying Is anybody getting it how ignorant it is to post this kind of shit and then say it has something to do with being "republican" or "democrat". Therefore, nothing bit me in the ass. I am just pointing out how ignorant this kind of shit is. The title to the thread says "Another Democrat..." which implies it is a democrat thing. It is ignorant shit.
Now go back to the flow of the discussion where I asked you a direct question. When you break up the flow and switch off to a different subject, it looks like a dodge.
Farnham child porn investigation shocks officials - Chicago Tribune
I'm guessing this perv, will soon be exonerated by the left, it's just another lifestyle choice, or maybe it's just genetic!
There is a long list of right wing perverts. Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick. Does that mean that all republicans do that?
So you are equating child porn with the LGBT community?
There is a connection nambla used to march with the lgbt.... and YOU defended this democrat by using larry craig.......therefore YOU compared homos with pedophiles......
No. There is nothing I said that could in anyway objectively be interpreted to show that I interjected the subject of "pedophiles".
You did it in this post:
great post, did he just equate homos with pedophiles? I do that and the left scoffs, but now they use it as a defense, ive always said liberals argue in a vacuum.
They dont care if their arguments are consistant at all
If you want to claim that it was me who brought up the subject of pedophiles and not you, then you need to quote me. Since you are not going to be able to do that, then I would like to repeat my question for a third time:
Why did you bring up pedophiles? Is that something that is on your mind? Please explain.
Read your first post silly person.
Just to clear up any confusion, we have now established that the right wingers do no consider Larry Craig to be a pervert.
There is a connection nambla used to march with the lgbt.... and YOU defended this democrat by using larry craig.......therefore YOU compared homos with pedophiles......
No. There is nothing I said that could in anyway objectively be interpreted to show that I interjected the subject of "pedophiles".
You did it in this post:
great post, did he just equate homos with pedophiles? I do that and the left scoffs, but now they use it as a defense, ive always said liberals argue in a vacuum.
They dont care if their arguments are consistant at all
If you want to claim that it was me who brought up the subject of pedophiles and not you, then you need to quote me. Since you are not going to be able to do that, then I would like to repeat my question for a third time:
Why did you bring up pedophiles? Is that something that is on your mind? Please explain.
There is a long list of right wing perverts. Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick. Does that mean that all republicans do that?
There is a connection nambla used to march with the lgbt.... and YOU defended this democrat by using larry craig.......therefore YOU compared homos with pedophiles......
No. There is nothing I said that could in anyway objectively be interpreted to show that I interjected the subject of "pedophiles".
You did it in this post:
great post, did he just equate homos with pedophiles? I do that and the left scoffs, but now they use it as a defense, ive always said liberals argue in a vacuum.
They dont care if their arguments are consistant at all
If you want to claim that it was me who brought up the subject of pedophiles and not you, then you need to quote me. Since you are not going to be able to do that, then I would like to repeat my question for a third time:
Why did you bring up pedophiles? Is that something that is on your mind? Please explain.
Just to clear up any confusion, we have now established that the right wingers do no consider Larry Craig to be a pervert.
this thread isnt about larry craig, why switcn topics. If you want to debate larry craig, start a thread on it
THIS thread is about another dem under investigation, the one i posted was for kidie porn, others are anti gun activist who run guns, ect, ecf
so start your own thread on larry craig, who youare obssesive over
No. There is nothing I said that could in anyway objectively be interpreted to show that I interjected the subject of "pedophiles".
You did it in this post:
If you want to claim that it was me who brought up the subject of pedophiles and not you, then you need to quote me. Since you are not going to be able to do that, then I would like to repeat my question for a third time:
Why did you bring up pedophiles? Is that something that is on your mind? Please explain.
Here is my first post:
There is a long list of right wing perverts. Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick. Does that mean that all republicans do that?
First sentence: "There is a long list of right wing perverts"
Second Sentence: "Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick."
Third sentence: "Does that mean all republicans do that?
It only requires a minimal comprehension level to put those three statements in context and figure out that I was saying that just because one republican does a specific thing, that doesn't mean all republicans do that specific thing. There is no mention of pedophiles whatsoever in those comments. The title of this thread gives the implication that "Another Democrat... as if it is a thing with Democrats and not just the one individual.
You know what? This is silly. Please stop pretending to be so stupid. You could have figured that out on your own.
No. There is nothing I said that could in anyway objectively be interpreted to show that I interjected the subject of "pedophiles".
You did it in this post:
If you want to claim that it was me who brought up the subject of pedophiles and not you, then you need to quote me. Since you are not going to be able to do that, then I would like to repeat my question for a third time:
Why did you bring up pedophiles? Is that something that is on your mind? Please explain.
Its funny, its like the black knight fro the holy grail. Did he read the article or even the wordi g on the link.
so he came up with larry craig and mark foley, two gays, zero pedophiles.....bjt atleast he see them all as sexual perverts, were getting somewhere
Here is my first post:
There is a long list of right wing perverts. Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick. Does that mean that all republicans do that?
First sentence: "There is a long list of right wing perverts"
Second Sentence: "Larry Craig hung out at the airport men's room trolling for dick."
Third sentence: "Does that mean all republicans do that?
It only requires a minimal comprehension level to put those three statements in context and figure out that I was saying that just because one republican does a specific thing, that doesn't mean all republicans do that specific thing. There is no mention of pedophiles whatsoever in those comments. The title of this thread gives the implication that "Another Democrat... as if it is a thing with Democrats and not just the one individual.
You know what? This is silly. Please stop pretending to be so stupid. You could have figured that out on your own.
so you just said sexual perverts.....so being gay is perverted, is that correct?
Just to clear up any confusion, we have now established that the right wingers do no consider Larry Craig to be a pervert.
this thread isnt about larry craig, why switcn topics. If you want to debate larry craig, start a thread on it
THIS thread is about another dem under investigation, the one i posted was for kidie porn, others are anti gun activist who run guns, ect, ecf
so start your own thread on larry craig, who youare obssesive over
Oh please. Quit pretending like you are really that stupid. There are all kinds of perverts in politics. When you try to talk about a Democrat and pretend like there is a link between being perverted and being Democrat, then it is fair to point out that there is a very long list of Republican perverts.
