Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
electrek.co
No.Thermal runaway at 30,000 feet!
Back to the Wright Brother's propeller is not advancement. Generally, short-haul flights can be turned around in 25 to 45 minutes, while longer-haul flights may require 90 minutes to 2 hours. Who wants to sit for 6 hours to a day waiting for it to charge up? Or will they double or treble the fleet of planes? I imagine they'll use diesel generators to charge them.No.
Power-pa
cked, fireproof
By eliminating the risk of leakage or combustion, the new solid-state configuration not only improves safety but also stabilizes the battery’s electrochemical processes, which are essential for supporting higher energy reactions over time.
At the heart of this chemistry lies a powerful catalyst: trimolybdenum phosphide (Mo₃P). This catalyst facilitates the critical four-electron transfer while ensuring the reaction remains stable over long use.
Old crock claimed batteries were green, now old crock admits batteries are throw away, use and throw away.Which means what in this context? If they can manufacture this battery, it will be a winner until something better is developed.
1000 cycles
Lordy, what a dumbass answer. The batteries will be switched out. Why would they not use the grid to charge the batteries? You people standing by the highway in the horse turds yelling "Get a Horse" sure have to reach to reject modern technology.Back to the Wright Brother's propeller is not advancement. Generally, short-haul flights can be turned around in 25 to 45 minutes, while longer-haul flights may require 90 minutes to 2 hours. Who wants to sit for 6 hours to a day waiting for it to charge up? Or will they double or treble the fleet of planes? I imagine they'll use diesel generators to charge them.
The alarmists can dream.
Yeah, like a big Makita drillLordy, what a dumbass answer. The batteries will be switched out. Why would they not use the grid to charge the batteries? You people standing by the highway in the horse turds yelling "Get a Horse" sure have to reach to reject modern technology.
And why not? In some nations they already are doing it with motor scooters. Why not with aircraft? Reality? The first battery driven drill I used was a joke. Little torque, and battery lasted just a few minutes. A couple year later at work they handed me a battery driven 1/2" drill motor and said they needed some holes in a 1/2 steel plate. I said, "Oh yeah, you want it this month?". So I tried it, went through the steel just like a standard corded drill, and when it hung up at the finish, damned near broke my wrist as I was not braced for the torque. The battery tech has evolved far faster than the ICE engine tech did. No reason not to expect quick removable batteries for aircraft.Yeah, like a big Makita drill
Your thinking, how cute. Can I suggest you live in the here and now, as in, reality.
Another silly ass rejecting progress because they cannot stand change. First, batteries with lithium are nearly 100% recyclable. Second, in aircraft, they will be removable, so that the turnaround time is minimum. And being removable, as soon as they hit about 80% of original density, they will either be recycled or repurposed.Are you joking?
A commercial plane can make between 60-100 thousand flights in its service life.
How is 60 to 100 complete battery replacements over the life of a plane anywhere close to practical.
Not to mention the environmental damage to buildings then discarding a hundred batteries for the 20-30,000 commercial planes in service
Soooooooo, I started on this forum about 15 years ago.Another silly ass rejecting progress because they cannot stand change. First, batteries with lithium are nearly 100% recyclable. Second, in aircraft, they will be removable, so that the turnaround time is minimum. And being removable, as soon as they hit about 80% of original density, they will either be recycled or repurposed.