Hard to understand the nonsense about qualification for the highest office to be determined by the place of birth.
The best qualified person should win that post regardless of place of birth.
A naturalized citizen has taken an oath of loyalty to his new country. A person who was native born never did. Think about that.
But he or she will take an oath if they become President.
So, two oaths by the non-native born - should one ever became president - to one oath by the native born.
Your archaic law is still nonsense. If you place the place of birth for the highest office, ahead of the welfare of the country, bad things are liable to happen.
The idea is, OBVIOUSLY, that they want the President to have loyalty and patriotism bred into his very bones.
They obviously failed to predict the rise of modern liberalism.
In that, I agree with you completely. The law is archaic.
It should be amended to bar both those not natural born, and liberals.