And the actual collusion, between the democrats and Russia comes into focus...

[2aguy]

Based on their own testimony before Congress it is pretty obvious who they are in the tank for. Pathetic that you can't seem to figure that out. But, you're a progressive, so no one can accuse you of having a brain.

Yes it was pretty bad of them to use facts instead of making up a story supporting Trump, like the right wanted them to do.

Really? All I heard from them was "NO". Pretty much every question that was asked in a public hearing was NO. Because they could be brought up on charges by Congress. But privately, they have been a leaking sieve geared wholly on the destruction of the trump admin.

You're a fool. But a progressive fool so that stands to reason.

So you wanted them to lie and say yes?

Nope. I advocate for honesty at all times. You don't. If it's your side you don't care what sort of unethical behavior they engage in. You are a now well known hypocrite.

And you are a well known liar. You have been presented with unimpeachable evidence many times, yet you continue to post discredited claims as if you believed they were true.

What evidence? Just screeching "Treason.....Treason....Treason...." like a parrot on crack isn't evidence...

 

[BULLDOG]

A press release for safety issues? Classes teach safety, not press releases.
NRA Explore | Student Courses

No. The NRA helps gun manufacturers sell more guns.

No, they don't. They educate people on the safe use of firearms.

Right. When is the last time they had a press release concerning the safe use of guns? They dropped that just before I dropped thm

Every second of every day. Which you would know were your head not so far up your ass.

NRA Explore | NRA Gun Safety Rules

That's a web site. I asked about a press release, or any kind of public statement to indicate that might be a priority.

Yes, and press releases continue to show the main focus of the organization. If the organization is focusing on something, there will be press releases to show that.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Russians supported the GOP for a reason. They knew America was unlikely to survive another GOP president as bad as Bush. Hope they were wrong.

They didn't support the GOP....they supported hilary, who they had already bought and paid for with 145 million dollars..and change.....they had hilary already sown up.....and then Trump won....

Hillary already had a hundred million. And no debt. Unlike Trump. The Clintons make no sense. The Trumps, with their great debt, do. Pity.

Hilary can never have enough money......she is obsessed with money and power........if she didn't want the money, why did she take 145 million dollars from putin?

145 million from putin? Credible link?

 

[westwall]

Based on their own testimony before Congress it is pretty obvious who they are in the tank for. Pathetic that you can't seem to figure that out. But, you're a progressive, so no one can accuse you of having a brain.

Yes it was pretty bad of them to use facts instead of making up a story supporting Trump, like the right wanted them to do.

Really? All I heard from them was "NO". Pretty much every question that was asked in a public hearing was NO. Because they could be brought up on charges by Congress. But privately, they have been a leaking sieve geared wholly on the destruction of the trump admin.

You're a fool. But a progressive fool so that stands to reason.

So you wanted them to lie and say yes?

Nope. I advocate for honesty at all times. You don't. If it's your side you don't care what sort of unethical behavior they engage in. You are a now well known hypocrite.

You pouted because they didn't say yes. i'm pretty sure they ere under oath, so why would you want them to lie?

So you're stupid as well as unethical? OK. Got it. Get back to me when you have a relevant statement or comment.

 

[westwall]

Based on their own testimony before Congress it is pretty obvious who they are in the tank for. Pathetic that you can't seem to figure that out. But, you're a progressive, so no one can accuse you of having a brain.

Yes it was pretty bad of them to use facts instead of making up a story supporting Trump, like the right wanted them to do.

Really? All I heard from them was "NO". Pretty much every question that was asked in a public hearing was NO. Because they could be brought up on charges by Congress. But privately, they have been a leaking sieve geared wholly on the destruction of the trump admin.

You're a fool. But a progressive fool so that stands to reason.

So you wanted them to lie and say yes?

Nope. I advocate for honesty at all times. You don't. If it's your side you don't care what sort of unethical behavior they engage in. You are a now well known hypocrite.

And you are a well known liar. You have been presented with unimpeachable evidence many times, yet you continue to post discredited claims as if you believed they were true.

Really? WHERE? You have presented nothing tangible. It is YOU who are the liar here sweetie. Thanks for pointing it out.

 

[toobfreak]

Not sure how your statement below aligns with this video.Care to explain?

What the hell do I have to do with some stupid video? Of all the crap floated about this site on Trump, I've given you the one piece of truly grounded information on the man. Worry about that. If some video suggests quite otherwise, you should question them.

 

[BULLDOG]

Not sure how your statement below aligns with this video.Care to explain?

What the hell do I have to do with some stupid video? Of all the crap floated about this site on Trump, I've given you the one piece of truly grounded information on the man. Worry about that. If some video suggests quite otherwise, you should question them.

Your post said he as a man of his word. THe video proves he's not.

 

[2aguy]

The Russians supported the GOP for a reason. They knew America was unlikely to survive another GOP president as bad as Bush. Hope they were wrong.

They didn't support the GOP....they supported hilary, who they had already bought and paid for with 145 million dollars..and change.....they had hilary already sown up.....and then Trump won....

Hillary already had a hundred million. And no debt. Unlike Trump. The Clintons make no sense. The Trumps, with their great debt, do. Pity.

Hilary can never have enough money......she is obsessed with money and power........if she didn't want the money, why did she take 145 million dollars from putin?

145 million from putin? Credible link?

Here you go.....embedded in the link is the New York Times story on how putin got control of the uranium...

Articles: Investigate Hillary's Uranium One Collusion with Russia


One deal which ended up giving Russian interests control of 20 percent of our uranium supply in exchange for donations of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a federal crime. As “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweitzer has noted:

Tuesday on Fox Business Network, “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” Breitbart editor at large and the author of “Clinton Cash,” Peter Schweizer said there needs to be a federal investigation into the Russian uranium deal then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved after the Clinton Foundation receiving $145 million from the shareholders of Uranium One….

Discussing the Clinton Foundation receiving $145 million from the shareholders of Uranium One, he continued, “Look there are couple of things that are extremely troubling about the deal we touched on. number one is the amount of money $145 million. We are not talking about a super PAC giving a million dollars to support a candidate. We are not talking about campaign donations. We are talking about $145 million which by the way is 75 percent or more of the annual budget of the Clinton Foundation itself so it’s a huge sum of money. Second of all we are talking about a fundamental issue of national security which is uranium — it’s not like oil and gas that you can find all sorts of places. They are precious few places you can mine for uranium, in the United States is one of those areas. And number three we are talking about the Russian government. A lot of people don’t realize it now, in parts of the Midwest American soil is owned by Vladimir Putin’s government because this deal went through. And in addition to the $145 million Bill Clinton got half a billion dollars, $500,000 for a 20-minute speech from a Russian investment bank tied to the Kremlin, two months before the State Department signed off on this deal. It just stinks to high heaven and I think it requires a major investigation by the federal government.”

Yet seemingly the only thing warranting a major federal investigation is a wasted 20 minutes of Donald Trump Jr.s life that he will never get back. Democrats and the media and, again, apologies for the redundancy, had no problem with Bill and Hillary Clinton brokering deals giving Russia and Putin 20 percent of our uranium supply to benefit Clinton Foundation donors, including Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra.

Giustra earlier had a cozy relationship with Bill Clinton and participated in and benefitted from his involvement in a scam run by the Clinton Foundation in Colombia.

Clinton donor Giustra benefited significantly from his association, even if the people of Columbia didn’t:

When we met him (Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo) in his wood-paneled office in Colombia’s Capitol building in May, his desk was stacked high with papers related to Pacific Rubiales’s labor practices, the result of years of investigative work by his staff. He did not see the Clinton Foundation and its partnership with Giustra’s Pacific Rubiales as either progressive or positive. “The territory where Pacific Rubiales operated,” he said, thumbing through pages of alleged human-rights violations, “was a type of concentration camp for workers.”…

In September 2005, Giustra and Clinton flew to Kazakhstan together to meet the Central Asian nation’s president. Shortly thereafter, Giustra secured a lucrative concession to mine Kazakh uranium, despite his company’s lack of experience with the radioactive ore. As Bill Clinton opened doors for Giustra, the financier gave generously to Clinton’s foundation.

As the New York Times reported, this mutual back-scratching gave Clinton donor Giustra control of a significant portion of the world’s uranium supply:

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton….

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges….

In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Mr. Giustra, a director and major shareholder in UrAsia, would be paid $7.05 per share for a company that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share.


---

As the New York Times reported:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.


Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.


Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well….

Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah.

So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with husband Bill, in exchange for donations, gave nuclear power Russia and Putin control of 20 percent of the world’s uranium supply.


Is that what Hillary Clinton meant by a “Russian reset”? Yet neither Congressional Democrats, who accuse Trump and his son of being too cozy with Moscow, nor their wholly owned subsidiary, the mainstream media, are eager to talk about the Clinton uranium deals with Russia.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Russians supported the GOP for a reason. They knew America was unlikely to survive another GOP president as bad as Bush. Hope they were wrong.

They didn't support the GOP....they supported hilary, who they had already bought and paid for with 145 million dollars..and change.....they had hilary already sown up.....and then Trump won....

Hillary already had a hundred million. And no debt. Unlike Trump. The Clintons make no sense. The Trumps, with their great debt, do. Pity.

Hilary can never have enough money......she is obsessed with money and power........if she didn't want the money, why did she take 145 million dollars from putin?

145 million from putin? Credible link?

Here you go.....embedded in the link is the New York Times story on how putin got control of the uranium...

Articles: Investigate Hillary's Uranium One Collusion with Russia


One deal which ended up giving Russian interests control of 20 percent of our uranium supply in exchange for donations of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a federal crime. As “Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweitzer has noted:

Tuesday on Fox Business Network, “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” Breitbart editor at large and the author of “Clinton Cash,” Peter Schweizer said there needs to be a federal investigation into the Russian uranium deal then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved after the Clinton Foundation receiving $145 million from the shareholders of Uranium One….

Discussing the Clinton Foundation receiving $145 million from the shareholders of Uranium One, he continued, “Look there are couple of things that are extremely troubling about the deal we touched on. number one is the amount of money $145 million. We are not talking about a super PAC giving a million dollars to support a candidate. We are not talking about campaign donations. We are talking about $145 million which by the way is 75 percent or more of the annual budget of the Clinton Foundation itself so it’s a huge sum of money. Second of all we are talking about a fundamental issue of national security which is uranium — it’s not like oil and gas that you can find all sorts of places. They are precious few places you can mine for uranium, in the United States is one of those areas. And number three we are talking about the Russian government. A lot of people don’t realize it now, in parts of the Midwest American soil is owned by Vladimir Putin’s government because this deal went through. And in addition to the $145 million Bill Clinton got half a billion dollars, $500,000 for a 20-minute speech from a Russian investment bank tied to the Kremlin, two months before the State Department signed off on this deal. It just stinks to high heaven and I think it requires a major investigation by the federal government.”

Yet seemingly the only thing warranting a major federal investigation is a wasted 20 minutes of Donald Trump Jr.s life that he will never get back. Democrats and the media and, again, apologies for the redundancy, had no problem with Bill and Hillary Clinton brokering deals giving Russia and Putin 20 percent of our uranium supply to benefit Clinton Foundation donors, including Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra.

Giustra earlier had a cozy relationship with Bill Clinton and participated in and benefitted from his involvement in a scam run by the Clinton Foundation in Colombia.

Clinton donor Giustra benefited significantly from his association, even if the people of Columbia didn’t:

When we met him (Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo) in his wood-paneled office in Colombia’s Capitol building in May, his desk was stacked high with papers related to Pacific Rubiales’s labor practices, the result of years of investigative work by his staff. He did not see the Clinton Foundation and its partnership with Giustra’s Pacific Rubiales as either progressive or positive. “The territory where Pacific Rubiales operated,” he said, thumbing through pages of alleged human-rights violations, “was a type of concentration camp for workers.”…

In September 2005, Giustra and Clinton flew to Kazakhstan together to meet the Central Asian nation’s president. Shortly thereafter, Giustra secured a lucrative concession to mine Kazakh uranium, despite his company’s lack of experience with the radioactive ore. As Bill Clinton opened doors for Giustra, the financier gave generously to Clinton’s foundation.

As the New York Times reported, this mutual back-scratching gave Clinton donor Giustra control of a significant portion of the world’s uranium supply:

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton….

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges….

In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Mr. Giustra, a director and major shareholder in UrAsia, would be paid $7.05 per share for a company that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share.


---

As the New York Times reported:

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.


Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.


Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well….

Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah.

So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with husband Bill, in exchange for donations, gave nuclear power Russia and Putin control of 20 percent of the world’s uranium supply.


Is that what Hillary Clinton meant by a “Russian reset”? Yet neither Congressional Democrats, who accuse Trump and his son of being too cozy with Moscow, nor their wholly owned subsidiary, the mainstream media, are eager to talk about the Clinton uranium deals with Russia.

Hang on a minute sweetlips. You claimed 145 million from Putin, but your article says 145 million from share holders of Uranium 1. Are you saying Putin gave them that money that they then donated, or did they donate their on money? For your story to hold up, you have to have some sort of proof that it as Putin's money donated.

 

[bripat9643]

I guess it could be any of the things you mention, but more likely this is just a pathetically desperate effort for Trump to discredit the people who are exposing his traitorous collusion with Russia.

No, that isn't likely at all, because the Russian hack "collusion" accusation is a great big nothing burger, and everyone who isn't suffering from terminal brain damage knows it.

 

[BULLDOG]

I guess it could be any of the things you mention, but more likely this is just a pathetically desperate effort for Trump to discredit the people who are exposing his traitorous collusion with Russia.

No, that isn't likely at all, because the Russian hack "collusion" accusation is a great big nothing burger, and everyone who isn't suffering from terminal brain damage knows it.

Then why so many lies by Trump and his cadre?

 

[bripat9643]

I guess it could be any of the things you mention, but more likely this is just a pathetically desperate effort for Trump to discredit the people who are exposing his traitorous collusion with Russia.

No, that isn't likely at all, because the Russian hack "collusion" accusation is a great big nothing burger, and everyone who isn't suffering from terminal brain damage knows it.

Then why so many lies by Trump and his cadre?

There are no lies, Mr lobotomy patient. Not disclosing some trivial fact about the election is not a lie.

 

[BULLDOG]

I guess it could be any of the things you mention, but more likely this is just a pathetically desperate effort for Trump to discredit the people who are exposing his traitorous collusion with Russia.

No, that isn't likely at all, because the Russian hack "collusion" accusation is a great big nothing burger, and everyone who isn't suffering from terminal brain damage knows it.

Then why so many lies by Trump and his cadre?

There are no lies, Mr lobotomy patient. Not disclosing some trivial fact about the election is not a lie.

Yes, there have been lots of proven lies, and just because you are still able to pretend they don't exist doesn't mean anybody else can.

 

[bripat9643]

I guess it could be any of the things you mention, but more likely this is just a pathetically desperate effort for Trump to discredit the people who are exposing his traitorous collusion with Russia.

No, that isn't likely at all, because the Russian hack "collusion" accusation is a great big nothing burger, and everyone who isn't suffering from terminal brain damage knows it.

Then why so many lies by Trump and his cadre?

There are no lies, Mr lobotomy patient. Not disclosing some trivial fact about the election is not a lie.

Yes, there have been lots of proven lies, and just because you are still able to pretend they don't exist doesn't mean anybody else can.

Please list one proven lie.

 

[toobfreak]

Your post said he as a man of his word. THe video proves he's not.

Donald Trump is a man who does not accept defeat. If you bargain a business deal with him he will hold up his end unless you don't yours. His self-image is built on success and excellence, he literally puts his name on his product, so he will do his utmost to be successful in his stated intentions and to execute them well in all cases possible. I don't know what the video claims, but videos can seldom prove anything because they can be edited to say anything they want, even the contents altered or changed. However, what cannot be edited of changed is Trump's lifelong history of how he conducts his affairs. He has literally kept a list of campaign promises on him in office and is going down that list one by one checking each off as he does them.

He does all of this against unprecedented opposition. Can anyone imagine what he might get done if he had even a little cooperation from Democrats and even a slightly fair media? It is singularly remarkable how the Democrats have put up a fight to not just discredit him, but to literally stonewall and obstruct his every effort to boost the economy, build infrastructure, make America safer, improve healthcare, fight crime, enforce laws, lower and simplify taxes and resolve foreign conflicts which threaten and concern us. They have literally proven that the Democrats are indeed actual enemies of the people. Just what battle do they fight to win but for themself? They lie about everything, every scandal they raise it turns out and will continue to turn out they not only fabricated and dramatized, but actually had a deep hand in doing the very things they accuse Trump of. The Democratic Party no longer represents what it once did and has been hijacked by a group of radical, crazed fascists using propaganda to conceal their efforts far and wide, but that too has failed, mainly because they became so sure of themselves in recent years that they took the make-up off and said: HERE WE ARE. In fact, THEY BRAGGED ABOUT IT. They grossly overplayed their hand and vastly, arrogantly overestimated their victory. They would have been right if this had been just another hapless GOP battle, but Donald Trump came out of left field and defied all of the models that politics are supposed to play by.

They went from the moment of final victory and total annihilation to abject failure and complete ruination, and they absolutely not only did not see it coming, but did not believe it even possible. Now in a flash, they are standing out in the middle of the street alone, cold and naked in the dark when they are supposed to be sitting on thrones, wrapped in furs, eating a feast of unimagined riches as they cling their goblets of fine wine in celebration. Losing to Donald Trump was the ultimate humiliation.

Trump was the worst of all possible fates: the guy has no vices--- he doesn't even smoke or drink. He lives to work, cannot be bought, has no price, cannot be bribed, extorted, threatened or bought. His worst skeletons have been laid bare and he simply shrugged them off. The White House staff themselves said that by Day Four, they had seen more work getting done there by him than in all of Obama's first four years. He works more in a day than Obama did in a month. He puts in 20 hour days. The Democrats have tried every scandal imaginable, faux investigations, accusations of collusion, impeachment and treason. I won't doubt they are looking at trying assassination next as a last ditch effort to slow him down. Trump makes no pretense of who and what he is. Trump is a machine, a builder, a bulldozer and wrecking ball and the Democrats and the Obama/Hillary legacy are his condemned building. Trump's agenda to make America Great Again literally represents their annihilation, and at the end of 4 or 8 years, one will be standing but not both. If Trump completes his 1 or 2 terms, he will go down in history as one of the greatest presidents in history. He will at once show what can really be done and what career politicians have always failed to do. Despite all of the obstruction and opposition, despite still only having a small fraction of his appointments, he has already raised the stock market to record highs, up almost 20% since he got in! Left to his designs, he will end wars, bring greater world peace, beat back tyranny and terrorism in the world and unleash the full might of the American Economic Engine.

How then can Democrats make the case that he must go, or that anyone should vote for them instead? How will they ever take the country back to politics as usual where you promise and promise until elected, then go off and party like it is 1999 until the voters are needed again for the next election? How will the Democrats ever win back control with Voter ID in all 50 states, illegal immigration thwarted, the border closed, the voter rolls scraped clean of fraud and sanctuary city funding cut off? These are the horrors that keep the Democrats awake at night tossing and sweating in their sheets, for the Democrats have no good answers and simply cannot survive 8, let alone even 4 years of Trump Policies. For them, better an asteroid hit the Earth than Donald Trump.