And so it begins.

If he profits by payments to his company for goods and services made by foreign governments he is in violation of the Emoluments Clause.
Hahaha no it’s not.

A president is allowed to have investments and those investments can earn money.

By your logic if a president owns stock in IBM and that stock goes up in value and IBM sells computers to China he’s in violation
 
At least you have the self-awareness to admit you've become a pitchfork wielding mob in support of Dear Leader's extra judicial plans to punish dissent.
Yep, we are coming after you guys HARD. We told you it would happen if the lawfare continued. You guys just laughed, so now its your turn.
 
From Masha Gessen in response to a question about where the lines are with respect to crossing over to authoritarian governance.

Gessen: Funny you should ask about lines, Patrick. I always think back to an incident, I guess about 10 years ago now, when yet another Russian publication had its editors fired and replaced with people loyal to the regime. When they met with the staff, the new editors explained that the change was inevitable, because the old team had “crossed the hard line.” One of the staff members asked where exactly the line was. “It’s always shifting” was the response. And that’s the honest truth. It’s always shifting.

Consider this: Think of autocracy and democracy not so much as systems of government but as vectors — at any given point, a society is becoming more democratic or more autocratic. And we are on an autocratic trajectory already. The other day, for example, I heard the head of a major foundation say that they’d started communicating with grantees by phone rather than email, to avoid leaving a FOIA-ble trail on topics (such as critical race theory and D.E.I.) that will get them in trouble with the new administration. Boy, is this familiar, as are the threats to which this foundation is responding: the threat of having its nonprofit status revoked, the threat of being declared a “terrorist” organization, as Lydia mentioned. I’ve lived through this. It’s the same sense of familiarity I felt when The Washington Post and The L.A. Times yanked their presidential endorsements just before the election.


The most insidious part of trumpery can be what we don't recognize as happening. Like institutions being cowed by the mere threat of what the regime may arbitrarily decide to do to them.
 
Anyone want to take a bet on whether trump pardons the remaining defendants in the classified docs case? Kind of a bad look for him seeing those folks get convicted.
 
Anyone want to take a bet on whether trump pardons the remaining defendants in the classified docs case? Kind of a bad look for him seeing those folks get convicted.
I’m sure he will. Innocent people caught up in the demafacist political prosecution

You think he will prosecute xiden now that xiden has said he in fact isn’t senile?
 
Maryland, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, has seen unexpected competitiveness due to the candidacy of popular Republican former Governor Larry Hogan. His Democratic opponent, Angela Alsobrooks, has garnered nearly double the financial support from foreign agents compared to Hogan.

The article says Hogan received financial support from foreign agents. Apparently, such info is available to the public. Are they illegal? Maybe you should look in to it.

BTW, what does it have to do with foreign nationals being able to contribute to the transition, in secret, because trump has refused to sign an ethics pledge.
Just plumbing the depths of your hypocrisy.

It's as deep as I figured.
 
It would be good for a laugh if not for the tragedy of the rubes believing the guy who is preparing to cash in on the presidency, again, is going to clean up DC.
Trump lost a billion dollars of his personal fortune his first term.

If he was trying to cash in, he didn't do a very good job, did he?

Maybe he should take lessons from Democrats.
 
President-elect Donald J. Trump has not yet submitted a legally required ethics pledge stating that he will avoid conflicts of interest and other ethical concerns while in office, raising concerns that his refusal to do so will hamper the smooth transition to power.

The fact that trump's transition team does not have access to info about current government activities because he won't sign the ethics pledge means his admin will be hampered on Jan. 20 when it takes over. Making his refusal an immediate national security issue.
Oh, please. Democrats don't give a shit about national security. That's why you hail General "Don't Worry, China, I'll Let You Know If Trump Wants To Attack You" Milley as a hero.
 
Talk about voting against your own best interests.
Democrats can never explain what's in my best interests, other than "voting to keep Democrats in power!" -- and that is NOT in my best interests.

See, you don't get to define that for other people. I'll give you a moment to come to grips with that fact.
 
President-elect Donald J. Trump has not yet submitted a legally required ethics pledge stating that he will avoid conflicts of interest and other ethical concerns while in office, raising concerns that his refusal to do so will hamper the smooth transition to power.

The fact that trump's transition team does not have access to info about current government activities because he won't sign the ethics pledge means his admin will be hampered on Jan. 20 when it takes over. Making his refusal an immediate national security issue.
I think they'll do just fine. LOL
 
Anyone want to take a bet on whether trump pardons the remaining defendants in the classified docs case? Kind of a bad look for him seeing those folks get convicted.
Nah. He'll just tell Pam to drop the cases.
 
Oh, please. Democrats don't give a shit about national security. That's why you hail General "Don't Worry, China, I'll Let You Know If Trump Wants To Attack You" Milley as a hero.
It's unfortunate, but not surprising, you've fallen for RWM disinformation about Milley's call.

Did you know trump used unsecure phones and gave security clearances to staff over the objections of security analysts in his first term? Then stole classified docs on his way out the door.
 

Trump officials to receive immediate clearances and easier FBI vetting

Exclusive: president-elect’s team planning for background checks to occur only after administration takes over bureau

Gee, why would Baby Donald need to hold off on FBI background checks until after Patel is running the show?
 

Trump officials to receive immediate clearances and easier FBI vetting

Exclusive: president-elect’s team planning for background checks to occur only after administration takes over bureau

Gee, why would Baby Donald need to hold off on FBI background checks until after Patel is running the show?
Because of anti-Trump assholes who have been proven to make up shit.
 
We told you it would happen if the lawfare continued.
Yes, trump said quite openly he planned on violating the Constitution on day one. You know that's a bad thing, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom