An excellent summary of the events leading up to Judge Boasberg's May 7 hearing...........

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
25,295
Reaction score
21,284
Points
2,320
........and notes from the hearing itself.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of Washington, D.C. held a late hearing, beginning at 5 p.m. on May 7, to hear motions in the case of J.G.G. v. Trump.

The suit, filed in the early morning hours of March 15, was originally brought as a putative class action by five Venezuelans who feared being summarily removed from the country pursuant to President Trump’s Alien Enemies Act proclamation. For confidentiality, the plaintiffs have been identified only by their initials.

The case has morphed since then. On the evening of March 15, the putative class members, except the five named plaintiffs, were, in fact, removed and imprisoned in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. On April 16, Judge Boasberg found probable cause to believe that those removals were carried out in criminal contempt of his orders. The contempt proceedings have been administratively stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit pending appeal.

After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the case’s claims had to be brought through habeas corpus actions filed in the districts where the aliens were confined, the original five named plaintiffs filed two new habeas class actions in the districts of their detention facilities: one in the Southern District of New York (G.F.F. v. Trump) and another in the Southern District of Texas (J.A.V. v. Trump).

However, on April 24, the same attorneys who brought the original J.G.G. case filed an amended complaint on behalf of two new “subclasses”; sought certification of those classes; and moved for a preliminary injunction. One proposed subclass was the group of Venezuelans already removed to CECOT—approximately 137 people. The other subclass would consist of Venezuelans whom the government deems to be members of the criminal gang Tren de Aragua—the group susceptible to Trump’s Alien Enemies Act proclamation—who are currently in criminal custody in state or federal prisons in the United States, but who are vulnerable to being removing under the proclamation at any moment.


Of note, the judge in the southern district of TX made a ruling regarding trump's use of the AEA.

Trump-appointed federal judge blocks use of Alien Enemies Act for Venezuelans in South Texas​


It's one of a number of cases the regime has lost in court on this matter.

Appeals court rules against Trump motion to halt deportations block


The country is fortunate trump has not so polluted the courts with obeisant appointees like Aileen Cannon that most judges still can be relied on to stand up for the constitutional order.
 
Has this been mentioned here before?
Congratulations for not disparaging the source, your normal strategy. Now let's see if you can take a step towards being a mature adult who wants to discuss things rationally. Perhaps make a comment about how you think the government did during the hearing. IMO, it didn't go well for the government's position.
 
Trump will follow Bill Clinton's 1996 Immigration Act and DEPORT your ILLEGAL ALIEN FRIENDS that you want as a new voter base because NORMAL Americans are SICK of the neo-Marxist Democratic Party.
Sorry for your loss, Stalinberg. :itsok:
 
Has this been mentioned here before?
Oh at least a dozen times, a number of them by this very OP...Orange Man consumes every moment of the committed moonbat haters, awake and asleep.

And we've already covered this "Trump judge" ruse as well...


Balwin.gif
 
Congratulations for not disparaging the source, your normal strategy.
When supposed "sources" are unnamed, i give them no credibility. Perhaps you can explain why they are credible?
Now let's see if you can take a step towards being a mature adult who wants to discuss things rationally. Perhaps make a comment about how you think the government did during the hearing. IMO, it didn't go well for the government's position.
The government is doing extremely well outside of the endless hearings which - like your endless threads - are intended only to slow things down.

Based on the number of deported violent wife-beating, human trafficking illegals who the hearings have returned to the U.S. (none of them) compared to the number Democrats were hoping to get returned (all of them), I'd say the hearings have gone very well for the government's position.
 
Based on the number of deported violent wife-beating, human trafficking illegals
I bet you wish those allegations had been proven in court. Oh.......wait.......in trumpworld the regime gets to decide guilt and innocence of the accused. No actual proof, presented in a court of law, is necessary. And folks like you are okay with that. Sad.
 
I bet you wish those allegations had been proven in court. Oh.......wait.......in trumpworld the regime gets to decide guilt and innocence of the accused. No actual proof, presented in a court of law, is necessary. And folks like you are okay with that. Sad.
I really wish the mods in here would take your shit and put in one fking thread. Repeat threads is against the rules as far as I've ever seen in here, and yet for some strange ass reason you are allowed to fill up space with redundancy!! amazing. MODS?
 
........and notes from the hearing itself.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg of Washington, D.C. held a late hearing, beginning at 5 p.m. on May 7, to hear motions in the case of J.G.G. v. Trump.

The suit, filed in the early morning hours of March 15, was originally brought as a putative class action by five Venezuelans who feared being summarily removed from the country pursuant to President Trump’s Alien Enemies Act proclamation. For confidentiality, the plaintiffs have been identified only by their initials.

The case has morphed since then. On the evening of March 15, the putative class members, except the five named plaintiffs, were, in fact, removed and imprisoned in El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. On April 16, Judge Boasberg found probable cause to believe that those removals were carried out in criminal contempt of his orders. The contempt proceedings have been administratively stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit pending appeal.

After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the case’s claims had to be brought through habeas corpus actions filed in the districts where the aliens were confined, the original five named plaintiffs filed two new habeas class actions in the districts of their detention facilities: one in the Southern District of New York (G.F.F. v. Trump) and another in the Southern District of Texas (J.A.V. v. Trump).

However, on April 24, the same attorneys who brought the original J.G.G. case filed an amended complaint on behalf of two new “subclasses”; sought certification of those classes; and moved for a preliminary injunction. One proposed subclass was the group of Venezuelans already removed to CECOT—approximately 137 people. The other subclass would consist of Venezuelans whom the government deems to be members of the criminal gang Tren de Aragua—the group susceptible to Trump’s Alien Enemies Act proclamation—who are currently in criminal custody in state or federal prisons in the United States, but who are vulnerable to being removing under the proclamation at any moment.


Of note, the judge in the southern district of TX made a ruling regarding trump's use of the AEA.

Trump-appointed federal judge blocks use of Alien Enemies Act for Venezuelans in South Texas​


It's one of a number of cases the regime has lost in court on this matter.

Appeals court rules against Trump motion to halt deportations block


The country is fortunate trump has not so polluted the courts with obeisant appointees like Aileen Cannon that most judges still can be relied on to stand up for the constitutional order.
The SCOTUS already ruled the President can remove folks under the Alien Enemies Act so not sure what your point is with the TX case

 
I bet you wish those allegations had been proven in court. Oh.......wait.......in trumpworld the regime gets to decide guilt and innocence of the accused. No actual proof, presented in a court of law, is necessary. And folks like you are okay with that. Sad.
No!

Why in the world would I want him to be convicted at a trial, when it is so much cheaper to just kick him out?

Has anyone in the Trump administration been convicted of illegally deporting Van Hollen's crush, or denying him due process?
 
The suit, filed in the early morning hours of March 15, was originally brought as a putative class action by five Venezuelans who feared being summarily removed from the country

They should self deport, before Trump gets them.
 
I bet you wish those allegations had been proven in court. Oh.......wait.......in trumpworld the regime gets to decide guilt and innocence of the accused. No actual proof, presented in a court of law, is necessary. And folks like you are okay with that. Sad.
Why? Why should we waste our time, and resources proving the crimes, when he is already deportable? Just deport him, save the tax payers money.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom