And take out the armistice lines and you have Palestine.
We don't disagree. The entire western portion of Palestine is one unified sovereign territorial unit (at least until Oslo happened).
When Eastern Palestine took over sovereignty from the British Mandate, as was their right by treaty, they changed her name to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. When Western Palestine took over sovereignty from the British Mandate, as was her right by treaty, they changed her name to ISRAEL.
Same story. Same result. Its all Israel. (Until Oslo).
We agree that there is only one territorial unit. You are just arguing that the territorial unit is not permitted to be the fulfillment of the right of the Jewish people to self-determination and self-government. You are arguing that the Jewish people do not and CAN not have the right of self-determination and self-government.
Look, you are the one who keeps arguing that people have an inherent, inalienable right to self-determination. You have been a champion of that on this board. And I applaud you for it. But you are a hypocrite (or worse) if you refuse to apply it to all peoples. The bottom line is that, if you believe in your own words, you must accept that the Jewish people also hold that right. There is no way around it.
The way I see it, you only have a few choices:
1. The Jewish people do not exist. (That appears to be most of monte's argument)
2. The Jewish people don't count as a people. (Challenger's argument, and part of monte's)
3. The Jewish people don't have the same inherent rights that other people do.
4. The Jewish people are a minority and minorities do not have the same rights that other people do.
5. The Jewish people and the Arab Palestinian people both have the same rights, including the right to independent, culture-specific self-determination.