America Is Slipping Through Your Fingers

Is the Constitution the law of the land?

Did you write that it isn't?

Looks like I did the schooling.


You better jot this down;
AI Overview



View attachment 1192995
Yes, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. According to the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2), the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties are the highest laws in the country, taking precedence over any conflicting state laws. All government and state actions must conform to it.



I notice you Leftists refer to imaginary "international law" yet live in America.

Argue these semantics all you want. And get back to me when Trump and 99% of congress are constitutional.
 
Is the Constitution the law of the land?

Did you write that it isn't?

Looks like I did the schooling.


You better jot this down;
AI Overview



View attachment 1192995
Yes, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. According to the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2), the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties are the highest laws in the country, taking precedence over any conflicting state laws. All government and state actions must conform to it.



I notice you Leftists refer to imaginary "international law" yet live in America.
Funny. You have no intention of debating anything. I mean you just glossed over the contextual base for my statement which I was very clear about and you just post nonsense thinking you have something. Then you go ahead and try to prescribe a position to which I never claimed regarding international law. Its easy to see you are out of your league without the ability to debate. Maybe you were able to do it before you got old and lost the abilities but I dont see it now.

You have doom posted nonsense for years and guess what? I still get richer and richer in this country and the working class continues to struggle - and they enable it by voting for the GOP that just gives me, and those like me, more and more. You guys totally crack me up. Keep advocating for me. I appreciate it.
 
Blah blah. Trump is at 31% and is now a lame duck. State MAGA party members are now openly defying him.

Also, where are the Epstein files?
Why am I not surprised you were able to make an entire post with nothing but lies. You liberal Democrats are all the same.
 
What is there to say to a coward who won't pick one of only two sides?

I'm not sure it's cowardice, which to me that means betraying your convictions or ethics by taking a certain action. Would it be moral cowardice to vote for somebody if in so doing one sacrifices his/her own morals? Even in this case where the reality is that only one of two people will be elected the POTUS, I am uncertain that voting for a 3rd party that cannot possibly win or even not voting at all isn't a principled stand because neither person earned your vote.
 
Yes.....attacking both sides is cowardly.

You are.


Your civic job is to find the one closest to your wishes and explain the choice........coward.


Let me help you to be more intelligent.


.... follow Lincoln's dictum: "Stand with anybody that stands RIGHT. Stand with him while he is right and PART with him when he goes wrong." Abraham Lincoln, Speech at Peoria, Illinois (October 16, 1854)
Howdy. I like much of what you believe. I believe you love America and embrace most of the conservative values that I do. But there are more than two sides at war. And at this point, I believe the real battle is between Good & Evil.

I try to determine which is which by judging the character of the people in charge. At this point, I believe just about everyone in D.C. is "evil." I believe Thomas Massie and Rand Paul are about "good" as we're going to get. I know it sounds cliche' but I still ask myself "what would Jesus do?"
 
Funny. You have no intention of debating anything. I mean you just glossed over the contextual base for my statement which I was very clear about and you just post nonsense thinking you have something. Then you go ahead and try to prescribe a position to which I never claimed regarding international law. Its easy to see you are out of your league without the ability to debate. Maybe you were able to do it before you got old and lost the abilities but I dont see it now.

You have doom posted nonsense for years and guess what? I still get richer and richer in this country and the working class continues to struggle - and they enable it by voting for the GOP that just gives me, and those like me, more and more. You guys totally crack me up. Keep advocating for me. I appreciate it.

I think it's even more cowardly to be loyal to any politician or party. That whole "lesser of two evils" voting seems to only produce more evil. (or liar, or corruption, or spending, or wars, or socialism)
 
I think it's even more cowardly to be loyal to any politician or party. That whole "lesser of two evils" voting seems to only produce more evil. (or liar, or corruption, or spending, or wars, or socialism)
I don’t know I don’t think the Democratic Party is particularly evil. I think it is ineffective and corruptible and has too thin of skin but not evil. The Republican Party only exists to make the wealthy wealthier and laughs and demonizes those who aren’t. It’s not the lesser of evils. It’s evil vs flawed.
 
Funny. You have no intention of debating anything. I mean you just glossed over the contextual base for my statement which I was very clear about and you just post nonsense thinking you have something. Then you go ahead and try to prescribe a position to which I never claimed regarding international law. Its easy to see you are out of your league without the ability to debate. Maybe you were able to do it before you got old and lost the abilities but I dont see it now.

You have doom posted nonsense for years and guess what? I still get richer and richer in this country and the working class continues to struggle - and they enable it by voting for the GOP that just gives me, and those like me, more and more. You guys totally crack me up. Keep advocating for me. I appreciate it.
Did you or did you not claim that the Constitution is not the law of the land?
 
I'm not sure it's cowardice, which to me that means betraying your convictions or ethics by taking a certain action. Would it be moral cowardice to vote for somebody if in so doing one sacrifices his/her own morals? Even in this case where the reality is that only one of two people will be elected the POTUS, I am uncertain that voting for a 3rd party that cannot possibly win or even not voting at all isn't a principled stand because neither person earned your vote.
Thoughtful post.
 
15th post
Howdy. I like much of what you believe. I believe you love America and embrace most of the conservative values that I do. But there are more than two sides at war. And at this point, I believe the real battle is between Good & Evil.

I try to determine which is which by judging the character of the people in charge. At this point, I believe just about everyone in D.C. is "evil." I believe Thomas Massie and Rand Paul are about "good" as we're going to get. I know it sounds cliche' but I still ask myself "what would Jesus do?"
Well put.
It is generally impossible to separate politics from religin, and I, also, tend to be Manichaen.

But I try to put my posts in either politics or in religion.

I hope to see more of your posts combining the two.



AI Overview

"Manichean" most commonly refers to
Manichaeism, a dualistic ancient religion, or to its followers, who believe in a cosmic struggle between good and evil.



And thank you.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know I don’t think the Democratic Party is particularly evil. I think it is ineffective and corruptible and has too thin of skin but not evil. The Republican Party only exists to make the wealthy wealthier and laughs and demonizes those who aren’t. It’s not the lesser of evils. It’s evil vs flawed.
Your party is evil.
I base that on its view of the sanctity of human life.





It's pretty clear: it is the value placed on human life.


1.None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



2. Take a look at how the Soviet Communists valued the lives of their citizens:
a. "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

b. "As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."


3." The Left hasn't made much effort to hide its disdain for human life and its raging God complex. In the Leftist hellhole that is Canada, their Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program has used euthanasia as a replacement for social welfare."
twitchy.com

A Modest Proposal: Colorado Assembly Speaker Says We Should Pay for 'Cheaper' Abortions Instead of Births


twitchy.com
twitchy.com


4. "Colorado Dems Push Taxpayer-Funded Abortion for Poor Women to Save the State Money: ‘Birth Is More Expensive’
Colorado Democrats are touting a new reason why the state’s taxpayers should pay for low-income women’s abortions. Not only would it support “equity and fairness in health care,” they say, but aborting more babies is good fiscal policy, too.

“A birth is more expensive than an abortion,” Colorado House Speaker Julie McCluskie said at a committee hearing this week, touting a legislative fiscal analysis that claims taxpayer-funded abortions could save the state a half million dollars or more annually.

McCluskie is one of four Democratic co-sponsors..."
www.nationalreview.com

Colorado Dems Push Taxpayer-Funded Abortion for Poor Women to Save the State Money: ‘Birth Is More Expensive’ | National Review

A bill pending before the Colorado legislature would force taxpayers to pay for abortions for women on Medicaid.
www.nationalreview.com
www.nationalreview.com


5. Death always seems to be the accepted outcome of Democrat politicians.

"Elderly people who are terminally ill have a ''duty to die and get out of the way'' instead of trying to prolong their lives by artificial means, [Democrat]Gov. Richard D. Lamm of Colorado said Tuesday. People who die without having life artificially extended are similar to ''leaves falling off a tree and forming humus for the other plants to grow up,'' the [Democrat] Governor told a meeting of the Colorado Health Lawyers Association at St. Joseph's Hospital. ''You've got a duty to die and get out of the way,'' said the 48-year-old[Democrat]Governor. ''Let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.''
GOV. LAMM ASSERTS ELDERLY IF VERY ILL HAVE DUTY TO DIE - NYTimes.com
 
Trump was elected because the alternative was Harris,
A truer statement cannot be said. Four years of Biden was another four years of Obumma and the first 8 were already far more than enough.

a total incompetent
About the nicest true statement I've ever read about her.

who couldn’t answer a simple question.
About the kindest true statement one could hope for that sagging sack of shit.

Love Trump or hate him, say what you want, but no one pulls more dank drek out of the muck like the democrat party does.


Screen Shot 2024-09-12 at 4.25.16 PM.webp
 
A truer statement cannot be said. Four years of Biden was another four years of Obumma and the first 8 were already far more than enough.


About the nicest true statement I've ever read about her.


About the kindest true statement one could hope for that sagging sack of shit.

Love Trump or hate him, say what you want, but no one pulls more dank drek out of the muck like the democrat party does.


View attachment 1193028
And she’s so full of herself that she thinks she’s getting a bust in the WH!

That’s what happens when DEI recipients keep getting jobs they’re unqualified for. They start to believe they actually deserved them.
 
Back
Top Bottom