Alleged history of climate change

[Robert W]

For the layperson, truth is not located in the mass media. They do not take a fundamental look at climate change. For example, is old temperatures reliable? We will now discuss this after watching the video.

 

[Donald H]

Never mind thermometers, we hav colour pictures of what the world looked like over 13.5 billion years ago.

This sounds like the I.D.'ers trying to take another run as mainstream science.

 

[Votto]

For the layperson, truth is not located in the mass media. They do not take a fundamental look at climate change. For example, is old temperatures reliable? We will now discuss this after watching the video.

You could do the same with the skull of Bernie Sanders.

 

[Donald H]

Robert please tell us that those denialist dum kuhnts haven't confused tree growth being dependent on heat, rather than moisture?

You're better than this Robert.

 

[whitehall]

The last ice age ended about 10,000 years ago which is a drop in the bucket in geological terms. The world has much more to fear from the apparent burp in that nuclear energy source in the sky that caused the ice age than the warming that the world is likely going through after the ice age. Global warming is an invention by a defeated democrat candidate for president, Al Gore, who thought he could make a buck from selling "carbon credits" but it's likely he never thought the concept would become such a political issue and a source of extortion.

 

[sealybobo]

For the layperson, truth is not located in the mass media. They do not take a fundamental look at climate change. For example, is old temperatures reliable? We will now discuss this after watching the video.

Scientists Say Trump Admin’s Climate Report Is Riddled With Errors founded on cherry-picked data and “just plain wrong.”

“It relies on ideas that were rejected long ago, supported by misrepresentations of the body of scientific knowledge, omissions of important facts, arm waving, anecdotes, and confirmation bias.”

In July, the DOE released a report entitled ”A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate”, which significantly downplayed the effects of climate change. In it, the writers concluded that “claims of increased frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts are not supported by U.S. historical data,” and that “CO2-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed,” according to a summary.
Climate scientists from a range of institutions, including MIT, UCLA and the University of Washington, signed a statement to the agency disputing these conclusions and questioning the way that facts were framed in the report. The scientists note that the report’s authors cherry-picked findings and cited “outdated or discredited studies” in order to support their assertions while failing to conduct a peer review of their work.

what does ding say about this?

For instance, the scientists suggest that the DOE report — which was compiled by five experts who have a history of minimizing concerns about the climate crisis — overstates the sun’s influence on global warming and discounts the human impact.
“Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking, the fossil fuel industry engaged in a coordinated campaign throughout the 1990s to fund scientists willing to argue that it was the sun, and not humans, causing the climate change observed up to that point,” said Ted Amdur, a climate scientist at Aon Impact Forecasting.

 

[Robert W]

Scientists Say Trump Admin’s Climate Report Is Riddled With Errors founded on cherry-picked data and “just plain wrong.”

“It relies on ideas that were rejected long ago, supported by misrepresentations of the body of scientific knowledge, omissions of important facts, arm waving, anecdotes, and confirmation bias.”

In July, the DOE released a report entitled ”A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate”, which significantly downplayed the effects of climate change. In it, the writers concluded that “claims of increased frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts are not supported by U.S. historical data,” and that “CO2-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed,” according to a summary.
Climate scientists from a range of institutions, including MIT, UCLA and the University of Washington, signed a statement to the agency disputing these conclusions and questioning the way that facts were framed in the report. The scientists note that the report’s authors cherry-picked findings and cited “outdated or discredited studies” in order to support their assertions while failing to conduct a peer review of their work.

what does ding say about this?

For instance, the scientists suggest that the DOE report — which was compiled by five experts who have a history of minimizing concerns about the climate crisis — overstates the sun’s influence on global warming and discounts the human impact.
“Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking, the fossil fuel industry engaged in a coordinated campaign throughout the 1990s to fund scientists willing to argue that it was the sun, and not humans, causing the climate change observed up to that point,” said Ted Amdur, a climate scientist at Aon Impact Forecasting.

Nobody here will stop your climate fear mongering.

 

[ding]

Scientists Say Trump Admin’s Climate Report Is Riddled With Errors founded on cherry-picked data and “just plain wrong.”

“It relies on ideas that were rejected long ago, supported by misrepresentations of the body of scientific knowledge, omissions of important facts, arm waving, anecdotes, and confirmation bias.”

In July, the DOE released a report entitled ”A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate”, which significantly downplayed the effects of climate change. In it, the writers concluded that “claims of increased frequency or intensity of hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and droughts are not supported by U.S. historical data,” and that “CO2-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed,” according to a summary.
Climate scientists from a range of institutions, including MIT, UCLA and the University of Washington, signed a statement to the agency disputing these conclusions and questioning the way that facts were framed in the report. The scientists note that the report’s authors cherry-picked findings and cited “outdated or discredited studies” in order to support their assertions while failing to conduct a peer review of their work.

what does ding say about this?

For instance, the scientists suggest that the DOE report — which was compiled by five experts who have a history of minimizing concerns about the climate crisis — overstates the sun’s influence on global warming and discounts the human impact.
“Just as the tobacco industry funded scientists to question the harms of smoking, the fossil fuel industry engaged in a coordinated campaign throughout the 1990s to fund scientists willing to argue that it was the sun, and not humans, causing the climate change observed up to that point,” said Ted Amdur, a climate scientist at Aon Impact Forecasting.

The sky is not falling, chicken little.

 

[sealybobo]

The sky is not falling, chicken little.

No but when you and people you know get cancer, enjoy dummy.

 

[ding]

No but when you and people you know get cancer, enjoy dummy.

I’ll take my chances like I do with everything else.

 

[sealybobo]

I’ll take my chances like I do with everything else.

So will the rest of us. Our chances just got worse. When you die 3.5 years earlier than you would have in 20 or 30 years, remember me on your death bed. Wonder if Trump policies contributed towards that tumor. And wonder if his defunding science stopped progress on a cure for that.

Yes, we know Republicans are risk takers.

 

[ding]

So will the rest of us. Our chances just got worse. When you die 3.5 years earlier than you would have in 20 or 30 years, remember me on your death bed. Wonder if Trump policies contributed towards that tumor. And wonder if his defunding science stopped progress on a cure for that.

Yes, we know Republicans are risk takers.

Is that what you’ll be thinking about on your death bed?

 

[sealybobo]

Is that what you’ll be thinking about on your death bed?

No it's what I'll be thinking about on your death bed.

Aren't you a RFK Jr fan? He believes a lot of stuff we do causes autism and cancer. Chlorine in the water and such. So yea, if I'm dying of cancer or get diagnosed with cancer I might be a little upset at EPA regulations being eliminated.

Reminds me of Tom Delay. Remember that asshole? He got into politics because they shut his toxic fertelizer company down. So he went into politics to undo regulations like the one that shut his toxic company down.

So yes, I will worry that Republican rule in the 2nd half of 2020's helped cause my sickness. Yes!

 

[Robert W]

No it's what I'll be thinking about on your death bed.

Aren't you a RFK Jr fan? He believes a lot of stuff we do causes autism and cancer. Chlorine in the water and such. So yea, if I'm dying of cancer or get diagnosed with cancer I might be a little upset at EPA regulations being eliminated.

Reminds me of Tom Delay. Remember that asshole? He got into politics because they shut his toxic fertelizer company down. So he went into politics to undo regulations like the one that shut his toxic company down.

So yes, I will worry that Republican rule in the 2nd half of 2020's helped cause my sickness. Yes!

Here is your self inflicted actual problem.

 

[ding]

No it's what I'll be thinking about on your death bed.

Aren't you a RFK Jr fan? He believes a lot of stuff we do causes autism and cancer. Chlorine in the water and such. So yea, if I'm dying of cancer or get diagnosed with cancer I might be a little upset at EPA regulations being eliminated.

Reminds me of Tom Delay. Remember that asshole? He got into politics because they shut his toxic fertelizer company down. So he went into politics to undo regulations like the one that shut his toxic company down.

So yes, I will worry that Republican rule in the 2nd half of 2020's helped cause my sickness. Yes!

You worry too much about things beyond your control.