- Banned
- #161
Thanks for your display of hurt feelings as a reason to run away.Thank you for making it clear there's no need to waste any more time on you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for your display of hurt feelings as a reason to run away.Thank you for making it clear there's no need to waste any more time on you.
Threats that draw the attention of federal law enforcement are not so vague.Which would only make sense. Vague threats and hyperbole aren't actionable.
If the authorities did not find a credible threat, why do you think a red flag law would have accomplished anything?And still, here we are.
So the shrinks want to be paid but not held accountable?No, I just know that people have ups and downs. I also know peope lie and can fool psychologists.
People may be fine today, but not so fine a year from now.
I don't know? The threats were over a year ago? This might have even been a junior high, at the time...this is now his high school.How did he get into the school after threats? Maybe an ankle bracelet tied to local law enforcement? Not my job to figure it out. Lock up the school. Protect the kids. Priority #1 about 5-10 years ago.
Sure they can be. Else they would have been there with handcuffs instead of questions.Threats that draw the attention of federal law enforcement are not so vague.
You seem confused as to what their job is.So the shrinks want to be paid but not held accountable?
They would have let a mental health professional make that decision, instead of their own unprofessional opinion on mental health assessment in this situation.If the authorities did not find a credible threat, why do you think a red flag law would have accomplished anything?
And red flag laws are precautionary by nature.They would have let a mental health professional make that decision, instead of their own unprofessional opinion on mental health assessment in this situation.
You try it for us. Let us know if law enforcement considers the threat to be vague. Their visit suggests it's not all that vague.Sure they can be. Else they would have been there with handcuffs instead of questions.
Try it. Post on Facebook to the effect of, "I kind of feel like killing a president."
You will probably get a visit.
Dont be so sure about that"Next time someone cuts me off in traffic, I will kill them."
Prosecutable? Nope.
i remember gov ducakas weekend furlough programYou seem confused as to what their job is.
What it isnt: royal decrees on humans that are binding until Gehenna
And also suggests it was not specific enough to be actionable.You try it for us. Let us know if law enforcement considers the threat to be vague. Their visit suggests it's not all that vague.
I am 100% sure. That is not a prosecutable threat.Dont be so sure about that
The two are not necessarily linked, as it is entirely possible for law enforcement to make the determination that there's no credible threat w/o taking someone to see a shrink - and if that determination is taken to a court. the judge will almost certainly either refuse to issue the order to seize firearms, or issue an order to return them.They would have let a mental health professional make that decision, instead of their own unprofessional opinion on mental health assessment in this situation.
He didn't fall through the cracks. They have no legal capacity in Georgia to do what you say.Zincwarrior
If the FBI can trace the threats to the boy then he should have been picked up and locked away till cleared by mental health doctors
This twisted little monster fell through the cracks and someone in authority must be punished for incompetence
Lock the guns up until reviewed.If the authorities did not find a credible threat, why do you think a red flag law would have accomplished anything?
See post 175.Lock the guns up until reviewed.
And that's where the cautionary component of red flag laws would kick in. Literally their only reason to exist.See post 175.
The investigation, as you provided, determined there was no credible threat - so, either the guns would not be seized, or, by now, they would have been returned.
So I was right about you being a Trumpie. It's so weird that Trump chose the venue and requested secret service snipers. Other former presidents don't have snipers on their secret service detail.