toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
al·le·ga·tion
[ˌaləˈɡāSH(ə)n]
claim · assertion · charge · accusation · statement · contention
How have we as a society gone from the burden of proof and the rule of law to where anyone can simply accuse you of something and without proof, be acted upon to be judged and sentenced?
Remember the witch trials of Boston? Burned at the stake for an------- accusation.
Is this the first step of the weaponization of female hatred towards men? Enter the new term: "Toxic Masculinity."
The charges could all be true. Great! Present the evidence. But there must be a process, otherwise, anyone can accuse you of anything just to get you in trouble because they have a bone to pick with you. And there needs to be a statute of limitations. For medical malpractice, that is two years. If you have been wronged and don't bother to bring it to anyone's attention within two years, that alone raises suspicion.
"Inappropriate Sexual Behavior." What is that? What is inappropriate? Who determines that? Does it vary from person to person? Does the accuser get to decide? How are you to know when you have crossed another person's unspoken line? Is it possible for women to be guilty of inappropriate sexual behavior?
What if nudie bar dancers, call girls, and girls wearing especially revealing and suggestive apparel out in public and acting in a provocative way begin to get charged with inappropriate sexual behavior? Is it impossible for a man to feel threatened or uncomfortable by a woman? Or is this another case where only men can have bad behavior just as only whites can be racist?
If there was a woman of authority in your office who disliked you and you knew all she had to do is accuse you of something, maybe caught you glancing at her chest (or just THOUGHT you were), would THAT make you feel uncomfortable and threatened?
Witness Matt Lauer, a man who has worked at NBC for over 20 years with never a bad word or complaint said against him all that time.
“On Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer,” Andrew Lack, the NBC News president, said in a memo to the staff.
Just the other day, I saw Tucker Carlson talk about years ago when a girl accused him of gross inappropriate behavior in very great detail and yet it was totally untrue! He fought to clear his name and it cost him a great deal of money. The woman was explicit, detailed, yet it was totally false. That is the danger of acting just on a person's word alone. Even little children, once Junior realizes he can get his older brother in trouble just by complaining to Mom, he realizes he has a weapon to use against him over and over, for fun, manipulation, extortion, even vengeance.
He said the allegation against Mr. Lauer “represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company’s standards. As a result, we’ve decided to terminate his employment.”
Does anyone realize the danger in this? Maybe he was guilty! But then, maybe he was innocent. A man's life and career ruined and based only on someone's claim? What power we have placed in women's hands, and we all know that ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY.
“My client and I met with representatives from NBC’s Human Resources and Legal Departments at 6 p.m. on Monday for an interview that lasted several hours. Our impression at this point is that NBC acted quickly, as all companies should."
Really? All companies should act quickly? Based on just a claim? Am I the only one who notices this is the DIAMETRICAL OPPOSITE to how the law works? Shouldn't companies take the time to get at the facts, the truth, carefully, out of an interest to fairness towards all their employees? DO YOU THINK IF A MAN MADE AN ACCUSATION AGAINST A WOMAN, THEY WOULD FIRE HER WITHOUT CAREFUL INVESTIGATION?
We are in a new age of hatred, hatred towards whites (White Privilege), Civil War figures long dead, Nationalism, and now men? Are men the latest popular fad to be burned at the stake? That is, until they start acting like women, change in order to conform to the mandates of a subset who said they wanted to just be an equal in the world? Now expecting that world to change to suit them? Empowering women to use mere words as weapons against anyone they don't like. I hear many women say how much less violent women are over men------ that men kill more, commit crimes, use knives, guns, etc., to hurt others. Maybe that is just because women aren't as well build for PHYSICAL violence? But what if you had a weapon you could use and it was nothing more than YOUR WORDS? Could it be that women have been historically less violent only because the means were not at their disposal? I've heard several times now where a woman claimed the world would be a better place if THEY ran it (with a smile on there face). What? A better place--- --- if it were without men? Or at least men were now on a lease controlled by women?
So how should men act now? How will you look at a woman? Address her? What is appropriate and what is not? What men are left with is a court of action with no clearly defined boundaries, no defense, and every day you go through life now, your every dealing with a woman, especially if alone with her, no witnesses, or a friend of hers, a week, a month, a year, or 20 or 40 years later even, you stand threatened to be accused, have your career ruined, your life taken away------ ZERO TOLERANCE. And for what?
BAD BEHAVIOR.
Or at least the claim of it. But EVERYONE has bad behavior. That is plain HUMAN. Where does that leave our children? Bad behavior is part of growing up. In a way, it is part of the fun and innocence of childhood, at least for boys, for bad behavior is usually not meant to be anything other than meant innocently. Sometimes it is just for attention and it can ever be because he likes you! And without bad behavior, you have no way of understanding good. What next (is it already here?), zero tolerance for our children, living in fear of any claim, any punishment just for being a kid? Zero tolerance for making mistakes at a point in life where you are just learning what a mistake is by making them? A childhood where fear drives out throwing apples, teasing girls, playing pranks, having fun, teasing, and making jokes? Are we putting our children, especially boys, into a straight-jacket to where being male is slowly being criminalized? Can you even begin to see the conflicts this will set up in our kids, where they cannot act out normal, human behavior and the consequences this might have on them as adults------ to be vented when the pressure reaches a breaking point, violently.
Curiously, isn't this just what we are seeing? Irrational, pointless, inexplicable violence erupting everywhere we turn now?
I don't want to live in a world much less even see what it does to it, run by and populated by people who have no tolerance for mistakes, no second chances, no leeway for fun and innocence, no leeway to be HUMAN. Where even little children must grow up overnight now to realize that their most innocent actions will now be taken very, very, seriously.
Welcome to 1984.
CBS has had their firing. Now NBC. They have both shown, overtly, that they are proactive in the war against inappropriate men. I expect that ABC will now find their sacrificial lamb, lest they be accused of being "insensitive" to the plight of the female worker------ who has to work with--------- men.
[ˌaləˈɡāSH(ə)n]
claim · assertion · charge · accusation · statement · contention
How have we as a society gone from the burden of proof and the rule of law to where anyone can simply accuse you of something and without proof, be acted upon to be judged and sentenced?
Remember the witch trials of Boston? Burned at the stake for an------- accusation.
Is this the first step of the weaponization of female hatred towards men? Enter the new term: "Toxic Masculinity."
The charges could all be true. Great! Present the evidence. But there must be a process, otherwise, anyone can accuse you of anything just to get you in trouble because they have a bone to pick with you. And there needs to be a statute of limitations. For medical malpractice, that is two years. If you have been wronged and don't bother to bring it to anyone's attention within two years, that alone raises suspicion.
"Inappropriate Sexual Behavior." What is that? What is inappropriate? Who determines that? Does it vary from person to person? Does the accuser get to decide? How are you to know when you have crossed another person's unspoken line? Is it possible for women to be guilty of inappropriate sexual behavior?
What if nudie bar dancers, call girls, and girls wearing especially revealing and suggestive apparel out in public and acting in a provocative way begin to get charged with inappropriate sexual behavior? Is it impossible for a man to feel threatened or uncomfortable by a woman? Or is this another case where only men can have bad behavior just as only whites can be racist?
If there was a woman of authority in your office who disliked you and you knew all she had to do is accuse you of something, maybe caught you glancing at her chest (or just THOUGHT you were), would THAT make you feel uncomfortable and threatened?
Witness Matt Lauer, a man who has worked at NBC for over 20 years with never a bad word or complaint said against him all that time.
“On Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer,” Andrew Lack, the NBC News president, said in a memo to the staff.
Just the other day, I saw Tucker Carlson talk about years ago when a girl accused him of gross inappropriate behavior in very great detail and yet it was totally untrue! He fought to clear his name and it cost him a great deal of money. The woman was explicit, detailed, yet it was totally false. That is the danger of acting just on a person's word alone. Even little children, once Junior realizes he can get his older brother in trouble just by complaining to Mom, he realizes he has a weapon to use against him over and over, for fun, manipulation, extortion, even vengeance.
He said the allegation against Mr. Lauer “represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company’s standards. As a result, we’ve decided to terminate his employment.”
Does anyone realize the danger in this? Maybe he was guilty! But then, maybe he was innocent. A man's life and career ruined and based only on someone's claim? What power we have placed in women's hands, and we all know that ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY.
“My client and I met with representatives from NBC’s Human Resources and Legal Departments at 6 p.m. on Monday for an interview that lasted several hours. Our impression at this point is that NBC acted quickly, as all companies should."
Really? All companies should act quickly? Based on just a claim? Am I the only one who notices this is the DIAMETRICAL OPPOSITE to how the law works? Shouldn't companies take the time to get at the facts, the truth, carefully, out of an interest to fairness towards all their employees? DO YOU THINK IF A MAN MADE AN ACCUSATION AGAINST A WOMAN, THEY WOULD FIRE HER WITHOUT CAREFUL INVESTIGATION?
We are in a new age of hatred, hatred towards whites (White Privilege), Civil War figures long dead, Nationalism, and now men? Are men the latest popular fad to be burned at the stake? That is, until they start acting like women, change in order to conform to the mandates of a subset who said they wanted to just be an equal in the world? Now expecting that world to change to suit them? Empowering women to use mere words as weapons against anyone they don't like. I hear many women say how much less violent women are over men------ that men kill more, commit crimes, use knives, guns, etc., to hurt others. Maybe that is just because women aren't as well build for PHYSICAL violence? But what if you had a weapon you could use and it was nothing more than YOUR WORDS? Could it be that women have been historically less violent only because the means were not at their disposal? I've heard several times now where a woman claimed the world would be a better place if THEY ran it (with a smile on there face). What? A better place--- --- if it were without men? Or at least men were now on a lease controlled by women?
So how should men act now? How will you look at a woman? Address her? What is appropriate and what is not? What men are left with is a court of action with no clearly defined boundaries, no defense, and every day you go through life now, your every dealing with a woman, especially if alone with her, no witnesses, or a friend of hers, a week, a month, a year, or 20 or 40 years later even, you stand threatened to be accused, have your career ruined, your life taken away------ ZERO TOLERANCE. And for what?
BAD BEHAVIOR.
Or at least the claim of it. But EVERYONE has bad behavior. That is plain HUMAN. Where does that leave our children? Bad behavior is part of growing up. In a way, it is part of the fun and innocence of childhood, at least for boys, for bad behavior is usually not meant to be anything other than meant innocently. Sometimes it is just for attention and it can ever be because he likes you! And without bad behavior, you have no way of understanding good. What next (is it already here?), zero tolerance for our children, living in fear of any claim, any punishment just for being a kid? Zero tolerance for making mistakes at a point in life where you are just learning what a mistake is by making them? A childhood where fear drives out throwing apples, teasing girls, playing pranks, having fun, teasing, and making jokes? Are we putting our children, especially boys, into a straight-jacket to where being male is slowly being criminalized? Can you even begin to see the conflicts this will set up in our kids, where they cannot act out normal, human behavior and the consequences this might have on them as adults------ to be vented when the pressure reaches a breaking point, violently.
Curiously, isn't this just what we are seeing? Irrational, pointless, inexplicable violence erupting everywhere we turn now?
I don't want to live in a world much less even see what it does to it, run by and populated by people who have no tolerance for mistakes, no second chances, no leeway for fun and innocence, no leeway to be HUMAN. Where even little children must grow up overnight now to realize that their most innocent actions will now be taken very, very, seriously.
Welcome to 1984.
CBS has had their firing. Now NBC. They have both shown, overtly, that they are proactive in the war against inappropriate men. I expect that ABC will now find their sacrificial lamb, lest they be accused of being "insensitive" to the plight of the female worker------ who has to work with--------- men.
Last edited:
