Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,

[The Rabbi]

How do you go about "defending traditional marriage?"

Advicating that its the only legal type?

If so, those advocates are looking to change the govt back into enforcing actual bigotry, by law.

The opposite has not been true. Not one person that Ive seen has advocated for the removal of the right to "traditional marry."

Not 1.

^^^
Not playing with a full deck.

^^ not a valid response b.c. is not capable of one.

It was appropriate for the level of insipid idiocy you demonstrated.

Fallacial ad hom. Coward's plight, the rabbi must face. I pity your existence.

That wasnt even English. I need a translation from Moron.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"It was appropriate for the level of insipid idiocy you demonstrated." Rab's diseased mind continues to sputter.

 

[G.T.]

Rabbi fails more so each day it's like the gift that keeps on giving.

Can a single solitary person raise their hand if they havent owned rabies at least 5x?

Anyone?

*crickets*

 

[Faun]

They are at risk of being treated like bigots because they are.

Noomi, nice to see you again BUT let me point out please that many do not see the attraction of an asshole.

Let's put this on the line here. It's not that people are bigots. It's just that heteros really are not attracted to assholes.

So to try to embrace the gay world is something so foreign to the majority they reject the gay world.

We're talking gay marriage and heteros can't even wrap their brains around that.

Hell's bells ask a poor hetero soul to go thru a "house of dicks" where you have men sucking off men anonymously and you are going to get joe average creeped completely out.

So for crying out loud have some mercy on the poor hetero out there who doesn't "get it". Just because they prefer vaginas shouldn't be a stamp of bigotry.

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

Civil marriage is a legal commitment. Gays were denied that.

You are a dishonest turd. The claim was they were denied the ability to make a lifetime committment. That is wrong.

Context actually does matter, even if your deformed brain can't fathom that. She said, "what gays won this week was...the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love."

In context with gays winning the Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriage as a right.

Dayam, are you ever retarded not to understand that.

 

[The Rabbi]

"It was appropriate for the level of insipid idiocy you demonstrated." Rab's diseased mind continues to sputter.

You are ignoring content by this member.

Ahh, the sound of silence.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rabbi has a reserved place on the adult short bus.

Marriage is safe.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rabbi fails more so each day it's like the gift that keeps on giving.

Can a single solitary person raise their hand if they havent owned rabies at least 5x?

Anyone?

*crickets*

Wow, a declaration of victory by someone who cannot write in English, cannot make a coherent argument, and cannot defend what he says without resorting to insults.
That's persuasive. Said no one ever.

 

[Wildman]

...gays can have the same rights under the law regarding their families...

how do qweers create "families" ????

 

[G.T.]

Noomi, nice to see you again BUT let me point out please that many do not see the attraction of an asshole.

Let's put this on the line here. It's not that people are bigots. It's just that heteros really are not attracted to assholes.

So to try to embrace the gay world is something so foreign to the majority they reject the gay world.

We're talking gay marriage and heteros can't even wrap their brains around that.

Hell's bells ask a poor hetero soul to go thru a "house of dicks" where you have men sucking off men anonymously and you are going to get joe average creeped completely out.

So for crying out loud have some mercy on the poor hetero out there who doesn't "get it". Just because they prefer vaginas shouldn't be a stamp of bigotry.

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

Civil marriage is a legal commitment. Gays were denied that.

You are a dishonest turd. The claim was they were denied the ability to make a lifetime committment. That is wrong.

Context actually does matter, even if your deformed brain CA 't fathom that. She said, "what gays won this week was...the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love."

In context with gays winning the Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriage as a right.

Dayam, are you ever retarded not to understand that.

He is the spin doctor of derp level retardedness.

 

[Faun]

The SG did no such thing. Rabbi is lying.

**** you, Jakehole.
Are religious colleges at risk if Supreme Court approves same-sex marriage Fox News

Your linked to a biased conservative propaganda site doesn't say what you think it does. When Verrilli said, "I don't deny that," he wasn't speaking about religious colleges being at risk of losing tax exemptions -- he was speaking of it is going to be raised as an issue.

While rightwing Fox hacked up his response in order to dumb down rightwingers, what Verrilli actually said was, "You know, I don’t think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it’s certainly going to be an issue. I don’t deny that. I don’t deny that, Justice Alito. It is –it is going to be an issue."
9In reality, the Solicitor General didn't answer the question. Brain-dead righties don't know that because they get their news from Fox, which manipulated Verrilli's response to the question to make it appear as though he didn't deny it.

You're such dishonest turd:

They point to an exchange between Justice Samuel Alito and the administration's top lawyer, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. Alito asked if, in the event the Supreme Court holds that there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, would religious colleges risk losing their tax-exempt status if they continued to advocate for traditional marriage only.

Verrilli responded, "I don't deny that ... It is going to be an issue."

Yes he cannot predict the future. But he doesnt deny that it will be raised and in light of the Court's opinion not only will it be raised but the objections will be sustained and religious colleges will be branded as racists/bigots/homophobes and action will be taken against them.
The homo activvists will stop at nothing to destroy those who disagree with them. Look at Brendon Eich.
If I hold a ball and drop it it does not require rocket science or prophecy to see that it will hit the ground.

You remain the fathful imbecile Fox News needs you to be. When Verrilli was asked if such a decision would lead to religious colleges losing their tax exempt status if they opposed same-sex marriage and Fox News edited his response to make it appear as though he said he doesn't deny it; when in fact, his answer was that he could not answer that question without knowing more specifics.

Fox News has you so dumbed down, you don't even realize how dumb you are.

LOL. He didnt deny it would become an issue, which it will.
You lose.

I lose nothing. I just showed how Fox News lied and you fell for it.

 

[The Rabbi]

Noomi, nice to see you again BUT let me point out please that many do not see the attraction of an asshole.

Let's put this on the line here. It's not that people are bigots. It's just that heteros really are not attracted to assholes.

So to try to embrace the gay world is something so foreign to the majority they reject the gay world.

We're talking gay marriage and heteros can't even wrap their brains around that.

Hell's bells ask a poor hetero soul to go thru a "house of dicks" where you have men sucking off men anonymously and you are going to get joe average creeped completely out.

So for crying out loud have some mercy on the poor hetero out there who doesn't "get it". Just because they prefer vaginas shouldn't be a stamp of bigotry.

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

Civil marriage is a legal commitment. Gays were denied that.

You are a dishonest turd. The claim was they were denied the ability to make a lifetime committment. That is wrong.

Context actually does matter, even if your deformed brain CA 't fathom that. She said, "what gays won this week was...the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love."

In context with gays winning the Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriage as a right.

Dayam, are you ever retarded not to understand that.

No one ever denied them an ability to make a lifetime commitment. Maybe you missed that?
What was denied was state sanctioning of their particular lifestyle choices, now imposed by 5 unelected judges and overturning numerous electons and referenda.

 

[G.T.]

Rabbi fails more so each day it's like the gift that keeps on giving.

Can a single solitary person raise their hand if they havent owned rabies at least 5x?

Anyone?

*crickets*

Wow, a declaration of victory by someone who cannot write in English, cannot make a coherent argument, and cannot defend what he says without resorting to insults.
That's persuasive. Said no one ever.

My post was responded to with insults, by you, yet didnt contain any.

Rabbifail#6, 426, 452: pot calling kettle black fail

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

Civil marriage is a legal commitment. Gays were denied that.

You are a dishonest turd. The claim was they were denied the ability to make a lifetime committment. That is wrong.

Context actually does matter, even if your deformed brain CA 't fathom that. She said, "what gays won this week was...the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love."

In context with gays winning the Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriage as a right.

Dayam, are you ever retarded not to understand that.

He is the spin doctor of derp level retardedness.

He is one of the least intelligent and most immoral posters on the Board.

 

[The Rabbi]

**** you, Jakehole.
Are religious colleges at risk if Supreme Court approves same-sex marriage Fox News

Your linked to a biased conservative propaganda site doesn't say what you think it does. When Verrilli said, "I don't deny that," he wasn't speaking about religious colleges being at risk of losing tax exemptions -- he was speaking of it is going to be raised as an issue.

While rightwing Fox hacked up his response in order to dumb down rightwingers, what Verrilli actually said was, "You know, I don’t think I can answer that question without knowing more specifics, but it’s certainly going to be an issue. I don’t deny that. I don’t deny that, Justice Alito. It is –it is going to be an issue."
9In reality, the Solicitor General didn't answer the question. Brain-dead righties don't know that because they get their news from Fox, which manipulated Verrilli's response to the question to make it appear as though he didn't deny it.

You're such dishonest turd:

They point to an exchange between Justice Samuel Alito and the administration's top lawyer, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. Alito asked if, in the event the Supreme Court holds that there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, would religious colleges risk losing their tax-exempt status if they continued to advocate for traditional marriage only.

Verrilli responded, "I don't deny that ... It is going to be an issue."

Yes he cannot predict the future. But he doesnt deny that it will be raised and in light of the Court's opinion not only will it be raised but the objections will be sustained and religious colleges will be branded as racists/bigots/homophobes and action will be taken against them.
The homo activvists will stop at nothing to destroy those who disagree with them. Look at Brendon Eich.
If I hold a ball and drop it it does not require rocket science or prophecy to see that it will hit the ground.

You remain the fathful imbecile Fox News needs you to be. When Verrilli was asked if such a decision would lead to religious colleges losing their tax exempt status if they opposed same-sex marriage and Fox News edited his response to make it appear as though he said he doesn't deny it; when in fact, his answer was that he could not answer that question without knowing more specifics.

Fox News has you so dumbed down, you don't even realize how dumb you are.

LOL. He didnt deny it would become an issue, which it will.
You lose.

I lose nothing. I just showed how Fox News lied and you fell for it.

They did not lie. Your spin cannot change that.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rabbi fails more so each day it's like the gift that keeps on giving.

Can a single solitary person raise their hand if they havent owned rabies at least 5x?

Anyone?

*crickets*

Wow, a declaration of victory by someone who cannot write in English, cannot make a coherent argument, and cannot defend what he says without resorting to insults.
That's persuasive. Said no one ever.

My post was responded to with insults, by you, yet didnt contain any.

Rabbifail#6, 426, 452: pot calling kettle black fail

Thanks for admitting I correctly categorized your posts.

 

[G.T.]

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

Civil marriage is a legal commitment. Gays were denied that.

You are a dishonest turd. The claim was they were denied the ability to make a lifetime committment. That is wrong.

Context actually does matter, even if your deformed brain CA 't fathom that. She said, "what gays won this week was...the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love."

In context with gays winning the Supreme Court decision to recognize same-sex marriage as a right.

Dayam, are you ever retarded not to understand that.

No one ever denied them an ability to make a lifetime commitment. Maybe you missed that?
What was denied was state sanctioning of their particular lifestyle choices, now imposed by 5 unelected judges and overturning numerous electons and referenda.

She was referring to a specific type of commitment: marriage.

But a dishonest **** such as yourself has to. You HAVE to spin that, because your entire basis of existence is cowardly back door spins like this. Hah, disgusting.

 

[Faun]

They are at risk of being treated like bigots because they are.

Noomi, nice to see you again BUT let me point out please that many do not see the attraction of an asshole.

Let's put this on the line here. It's not that people are bigots. It's just that heteros really are not attracted to assholes.

So to try to embrace the gay world is something so foreign to the majority they reject the gay world.

We're talking gay marriage and heteros can't even wrap their brains around that.

Hell's bells ask a poor hetero soul to go thru a "house of dicks" where you have men sucking off men anonymously and you are going to get joe average creeped completely out.

So for crying out loud have some mercy on the poor hetero out there who doesn't "get it". Just because they prefer vaginas shouldn't be a stamp of bigotry.

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

You didn't know she was talking about the lifetime commitment of being legally married??

Just how stupid are you, forum jester ?

LOL. What a spin.
You lose.

Too funny. To the brain dead right, context is "spin."

 

[The Rabbi]

...gays can have the same rights under the law regarding their families...

how do qweers create "families" ????

Smoke and mirrors.

 

[Faun]

They are at risk of being treated like bigots because they are.

Noomi, nice to see you again BUT let me point out please that many do not see the attraction of an asshole.

Let's put this on the line here. It's not that people are bigots. It's just that heteros really are not attracted to assholes.

So to try to embrace the gay world is something so foreign to the majority they reject the gay world.

We're talking gay marriage and heteros can't even wrap their brains around that.

Hell's bells ask a poor hetero soul to go thru a "house of dicks" where you have men sucking off men anonymously and you are going to get joe average creeped completely out.

So for crying out loud have some mercy on the poor hetero out there who doesn't "get it". Just because they prefer vaginas shouldn't be a stamp of bigotry.

Why are conservatives so focussed on gay sex? Several of you have posted graphic descriptions of gay sex.

There is a vast difference between anonymous sex and marriage. What gays won this week wasn't the right to go to bathhouses but the right to make a lifetime commitment to the person they love. One would think that heterosexuals can relate to the importance of such a relationship in a person's life.

Your obsession with the lurid details of gay sex, while supposedly being repulsed by it, is creepy.

Mp pme ever denied anyone the ability to make a lifelong commitment. Another lie by the Left.

You didn't know she was talking about the lifetime commitment of being legally married??

Just how stupid are you, forum jester ?

I believe he isna descendant of Stephanie

Maybe they're fraternal twins? They are the dumbest posters on this forum.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Rabbi has been bent over and taken. Metaphorically. He is crying happily.

Marriage is healthy and fine.