In the entire history of humanity: NO LAW HAS EVER BEEN BROKEN BY A THOUGHT.
Who claimed otherwise?
You did... and ya did so through implication. It's right in the record above.
Let's review:
Not baking a cake, is by definition: INACTION; OKA: THE REFUSAL TO ACT.
You claimed that the principled stand, wherein an individual REFUSES TO TAKE ACTION, CONSTITUTES ACTION.
A law which requires one to ACT outside of what they know to be truthful, viable and sustainable actions, is INVALID LAW and does NOT OBLIGATE A VIABLE INDIVIDUAL and by extension is not relevant to, thus is counter productive to a viable culture.
Thus you are claiming that THOSE THOUGHTS ARE CRIMINAL... in that they provide for one to NOT TAKE ACTION, where the would-be law, requires they must.
There's nothing complex about any of this, yet there you are... completely incapable of discussing it without wholly humiliating yourself.