Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore Thrashes Liberal Chris Cuomo In Epic Interview Over Gay Marriage

Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.
Quit being personally insulted by broad social trends.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

Yep- those homosexuals are sure uppity- they want to be treated equally with white folk- I mean with straight folk!

How dare they!
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

You obviously are from Alabama.
Alabama is as much a retarded state of mind as a state, they are part of the reason American racism has a predominantly southern accent.
Obama is from Hawaii...or so he claims.
Interesting, some of our nation's most heinous racists have been from Alabama and here is this judge playing the very stereotype of a southern bigot to the hilt with the same kind of supporters his kind has always drawn. Those who cloak their bigotry in legal spurious legal arguments and appeals to faith and tradition.
 
It's like the black people wanting equality by being called white, instead of getting equality and remaining who they are.
Nope. It is more like black people wanting to be called human beings and you getting all angry about having to change the definition of human being.

You see, calling a black person a human being does not change your humanity in any way.

Just so with gay marriage. Calling it a marriage does not change your marriage in any way.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
What's your definition of accommodating? Those people go to jail.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

You obviously are from Alabama.
Alabama is as much a retarded state of mind as a state, they are part of the reason American racism has a predominantly southern accent.
Obama is from Hawaii...or so he claims.
Interesting, some of our nation's most heinous racists have been from Alabama and here is this judge playing the very stereotype of a southern bigot to the hilt with the same kind of supporters his kind has always drawn. Those who cloak their bigotry in legal spurious legal arguments and appeals to faith and tradition.

Stupid is as stupid does.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
What's your definition of accommodating? Those people go to jail.

You certain about that?
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
What's your definition of accommodating? Those people go to jail.

You're the one who said there are a number of way to accommodate homos. What are those ways of yours?
 
It's like the black people wanting equality by being called white, instead of getting equality and remaining who they are.
Nope. It is more like black people wanting to be called human beings and you getting all angry about having to change the definition of human being.

You see, calling a black person a human being does not change your humanity in any way.

Just so with gay marriage. Calling it a marriage does not change your marriage in any way.
A black person is a human being...you are not a woman....I think.
 
Change the definition of marriage so the fags can get benefits. Sound like a Libtard cause? End of argument.

Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
What's your definition of accommodating? Those people go to jail.

You're the one who said there are a number of way to accommodate homos. What are those ways of yours?
Civil contract having nothing to so with sexual proclivities...if you want to live with and mutually provide for your fishing buddy...sign the contract. You should not have to, or be expected to anally assault him.
 
Treat people equally even if they are homosexuals? Sounds like something a conservative would object to.
There are any number of ways to accommodate homos without changing the definition of the basic unit of society. But homos can't abide that...they have to be the same even though they are different. Even to go as far as getting rid of terms that identify the basic understanding of our sexual identity. Slouching toward Gomorrah.

How do you see accommodating homes where fathers rape their daughters; homes where incest is taking place; homes where women are being abused; homes where children are being abused; homes where victims are being held without their consent; homes that have been turned into drug and prostitution dens?
What's your definition of accommodating? Those people go to jail.

You're the one who said there are a number of way to accommodate homos. What are those ways of yours?
Civil contract having nothing to so with sexual proclivities...if you want to live with and mutually provide for your fishing buddy...sign the contract. You should not have to, or be expected to annally assault him.

???
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top