Airlines Want to Ban Disruptive Passengers - Republicans Say No

[Delldude]

Yep, those convicted in a court of law of endangering the safety of their fellow passengers should be banned from flying on future flights, but 8 conservative Republican Senators, the infamous Cancun Ted one of them, say NO!

Assault in the air is no different than in the street........for the safety of our fellow citizens, anyone, under your metric, should be banned from flying and wherever else the totalitarians may dictate.

 

[Delldude]

It depends on who is making the call. Totalitarian Democrats think not being vaccinated, not wearing a mask and speaking your mind on social media are disruptive behaviors. They can't be trusted to judge.

Democrats crafting a 'No Cry List'

 

[jc456]

The real point here is that you and your Nazis want to have the power to permanently ground any person a corporation chooses to attack for NON-VIOLENT disagreements and protests. Get over yourself.

they think the jews were terrorists.

 

[Delldude]

they think the jews were terrorists.

What Jew mean by that?

 

[Meister]

Those days are over, we are living in the era of Trump. Bad behavior is a badge of honor amongst Trumpists.

No, we are now living in the era of Brandon.
Trump would have gotten rid of any mandates and there would have not been
the disruptions we are seeing now, Daniel.

 

[bodecea]

WaPo.

And...?

 

[bodecea]

Those days are over, we are living in the era of Trump. Bad behavior is a badge of honor amongst Trumpists.

Agreed....and they don't want con-sequences for their thuggish behavior.

 

[bodecea]

Trump's rube cult is TOTALLY into impeasment because they worship Putin almost as much as they worship Orange Jesus!!

Cults gonna cult!

LOL

Well, from reading this thread, we know who can't behave in a civilized manner on an airplane.

 

[Delldude]

And...?

 

[Delldude]

Well, from reading this thread, we know who can't behave in a civilized manner on an airplane.

Not working out too well on our streets and schools.

 

[colfax_m]

No, we are now living in the era of Brandon.
Trump would have gotten rid of any mandates and there would have not been
the disruptions we are seeing now, Daniel.

Weren’t the FAA making mandates put into place under Trump?

 

[jc456]

What Jew mean by that?

Huh?

 

[Meister]

Weren’t the FAA making mandates put into place under Trump?

Yes, when they were needed, (when the masks effectiveness were still in question)Trump would have known when they weren't needed, and wouldn't have Fauci as the thermometer
as to when it should end.

 

[colfax_m]

Yes, when they were needed, (when the masks effectiveness were still in question)Trump would have known when they weren't needed, and wouldn't have Fauci as the thermometer
as to when it should end.

But you guys have been saying masks were ineffective from the start, which is why there's so many episodes of people refusing to follow the rule and getting arrested in the name of their concept of "muh freedom" which doesn't exist.

 

[Meister]

But you guys have been saying masks were ineffective from the start, which is why there's so many episodes of people refusing to follow the rule and getting arrested in the name of their concept of "muh freedom" which doesn't exist.

And low and behold, they are ineffective as it turns out. Yet, Brandon keeps pushing them, hence, the disruptions.

 

[jc456]

But you guys have been saying masks were ineffective from the start, which is why there's so many episodes of people refusing to follow the rule and getting arrested in the name of their concept of "muh freedom" which doesn't exist.

They are!! You nor anyone can prove otherwise. You want to suffocate, go for it, manufacturers did the research and found they are ineffective for protecting against a virus!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Trump's rube cult is TOTALLY into impeasment because they worship Putin almost as much as they worship Orange Jesus!!

Cults gonna cult!

LOL

Not really, durham just showed the clintons and obamas were the putin worshippers and colluders.

 

[Delldude]

And low and behold, they are ineffective as it turns out. Yet, Brandon keeps pushing them, hence, the disruptions.

Then there's that pesky Danish mask study.

The trial was designed to detect at least a 50% protection against a SARS-CoV-2 infection given by mask wearing, assuming that the incidence rate in people not wearing masks was 2% per month. That assumption turned out to be correct, as the authors found a 2% per month rate during the study, and therefore the sample size calculation carried out before the study was right. Since the research did not find a statistically significant result for the effect of masks on SARS-CoV-2 infection, the conclusion we must draw is that masks give a protection that is less than 50%. That is a very important message to give to the many people thinking that masks give a protection that is close to 100%. Should those people attend crowded enclosed spaces assuming that masks protect them, they would put themselves at risk.

Another conclusion from the study comes from the interpretation of the infection incidence rates. Thanks to the DANMASK-19 study, Denmark is the only country in the world for which we have reliable estimates around the rates from both the first and the second epidemic wave. The study was conducted just after the first epidemic peak in Denmark (April–May 2020), so we know that the rate during that period of time was about 2% per month. During the second peak (Oct–Nov 2020), the infection rate in the general population was just about 2% per month,[2] hence very similar compared to the first peak. That suggests that all mitigating measures that have been taken in Denmark to prevent a second wave had no tangible effect on the spread of Covid-19. Those measures included a universal mask mandate.

Conclusions from the Danish mask study

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

But you guys have been saying masks were ineffective from the start, which is why there's so many episodes of people refusing to follow the rule and getting arrested in the name of their concept of "muh freedom" which doesn't exist.

Which is as stupid as saying the freedom movement by the truckers in Canada is their fault and not the fault of Dementia or Trudeau.

 

[colfax_m]

Which is as stupid as saying the freedom movement by the truckers in Canada is their fault and not the fault of Dementia or Trudeau.

It is their fault. They chose to break the law. They’ll fade the consequences.

Or do you no longer believe in that sort of thing?