Ahmadinejad wants Israel to Attack Iran... Here's why

[mal]

Ahmadinejad wants Israel to Attack Iran... Here's why

It's Obvious that Ahmadinejad is having a Difficult time Controlling the Revolution that is Festering in his Country right now.

It's also Obvious that Arab Unity is Need of a LONG Overdue Boost in that Region.

What better way to Accomplish both than to have Israel become the Focal Point of Collective Arab Rage again?

An Attack by Israel would be Strateegeryic, Targeting Real or Perceived Noo-cue-LAR Sites, and would come with limited Civilian Casualties.

This would be just enough to Satisfy the Increasingly and Justifiably Edgy Jewish Population in the Region, while not being so much that it Causes all out War in the Region, which would not be Beneficial for ANYONE.

Because Regardless of what Ahk-muh-Jihadidahd CLAIMS about Iran, Israel is VERY Nuclear and MORE than Willing to Use it.

It would also Rally not only Iranians together, but much of the Arab World Against a Common Enemy that they have been Loosing Sight of in Recent years, what with all of our Happenings and Goings on over there since Saddam Invaded Kuwait almost 2 Decades ago… Damn, it’s been that Long, hasn’t it.

Barry would Issue a Firm Condemnation of the Action, while Respecting Israel's Right to the Protect itself, blah, blah, blah...

Anyway, that's one Cracker's Opinion… So when it Happens, you Read it here FIRST!

And if doesn’t, I won’t Acknowledge that I ever Made the Prediction… I Learned that Tactic from my Friends on the Left!

Copyright ©2010 - americanfreepress.org/tha malcontent​

peace...

 

[ekrem]

(...)
An Attack by Israel would be Strateegeryic, Targeting Real or Perceived Noo-cue-LAR Sites, and would come with limited Civilian Casualties.
(...)

If attacking Iran would be an option it would have happened long ago.
Your predictions about limited Civilian Casualties are also doubtfull, because things tend to develop an uncontrollable momentum. No one can simulate an outcome, afterwards everyone will be smarter.

These are the underlying facts of any aggression in the region:
1.) It is not UN backed by the world community
2.) an attack is an illegal act of agression if not met condition 1.) and will force non-involved countries to take a stance to this aggression.

Because Regardless of what Ahk-muh-Jihadidahd CLAIMS about Iran, Israel is VERY Nuclear and MORE than Willing to Use it.

The 2nd part of your sentence after the semi-colon is the reason why Israel must be disarmed.
It also proves there is an unjust balance within how the world currently works in interest-conflicts. There are preferential standards.
These standards will be dumped into toilet with an emerging multi-polar world-order.

The only just and sustainable solution to prevent nuclearization of the region, is a complete nuclear-free Middle East. Including Israel.

 

[mal]

(...)
An Attack by Israel would be Strateegeryic, Targeting Real or Perceived Noo-cue-LAR Sites, and would come with limited Civilian Casualties.
(...)

If attacking Iran would be an option it would have happened long ago.
Your predictions about limited Civilian Casualties are also doubtfull, because things tend to develop an uncontrollable momentum. No one can simulate an outcome, afterwards everyone will be smarter.

These are the underlying facts of any aggression in the region:
1.) It is not UN backed by the world community
2.) an attack is an illegal act of agression if not met condition 1.) and will force non-involved countries to take a stance to this aggression.

Because Regardless of what Ahk-muh-Jihadidahd CLAIMS about Iran, Israel is VERY Nuclear and MORE than Willing to Use it.

The 2nd part of your sentence after the semi-colon is the reason why Israel must be disarmed.
It also proves there is an unjust balance within how the world currently works in interest-conflicts. There are preferential standards.
These standards will be dumped into toilet with an emerging multi-polar world-order.

The only just and sustainable solution to prevent nuclearization of the region, is a complete nuclear-free Middle East. Including Israel.

Is Israel Targeted Nuke Facilities, there would be a LOT of Pissing and Moaning...

Some Missiles Lobbed from the West Bank by the Arab World's Agitator Mules...

But Aside from that, the Islamists may be Angry and Suicidal, but they aren't Genocidal for the Entire Middle East.



peace...

 

[mal]

Wars... And Rumors of War.

The United States won't bomb Iran, but another country might. - By Anne Applebaum - Slate Magazine



peace...

 

[Marc39]

(...)
An Attack by Israel would be Strateegeryic, Targeting Real or Perceived Noo-cue-LAR Sites, and would come with limited Civilian Casualties.
(...)

If attacking Iran would be an option it would have happened long ago.
Your predictions about limited Civilian Casualties are also doubtfull, because things tend to develop an uncontrollable momentum. No one can simulate an outcome, afterwards everyone will be smarter.

These are the underlying facts of any aggression in the region:
1.) It is not UN backed by the world community
2.) an attack is an illegal act of agression if not met condition 1.) and will force non-involved countries to take a stance to this aggression.

Because Regardless of what Ahk-muh-Jihadidahd CLAIMS about Iran, Israel is VERY Nuclear and MORE than Willing to Use it.

The 2nd part of your sentence after the semi-colon is the reason why Israel must be disarmed.
It also proves there is an unjust balance within how the world currently works in interest-conflicts. There are preferential standards.
These standards will be dumped into toilet with an emerging multi-polar world-order.

The only just and sustainable solution to prevent nuclearization of the region, is a complete nuclear-free Middle East. Including Israel.

Israel is surrounded by 350 million hostile Islamos. No country merits a nuke than Israel.
Iran is in violation of numerous UN resolutions and other regulations prohibiting the support of terrorism.

 

[Jos]

Iran is in violation of numerous UN resolutions and other regulations prohibiting the support of terrorism.

Care to post any?
And how does Israel stack up in violations of UN resolutions

United Nations Security Council resolutions


1. Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission
2. Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes "increasing violence and disorder in Palestine" and requests that representatives of "the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee" arrange, with the Security Council, "a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine...Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately."
3. Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly
4. Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, "it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine." The Resolutions also "Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine" to stop importing "armed bands and fighting personnel...whatever their origin;...weapons and war materials;...Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine...from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;...refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine."
5. Resolution 48: The Palestine Question (23 Apr 1948)
6. Resolution 49: The Palestine Question (22 May 1948)
7. Resolution 50: The Palestine Question (29 May 1948)
8. Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)
9. Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)
10. Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)
11. Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)
12. Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)
13. Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)
14. Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)
15. Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)
16. Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)
17. Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
18. Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
19. Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and "transfer of persons".
20. Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)
21. Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)
22. Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)
23. Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)
24. Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)
25. Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid.
26. Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 March)
27. Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 September)
28. Resolution 111: " ... 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".
29. Resolution 113: The Palestine Question (4 April)
30. Resolution 114: The Palestine Question (4 June)
31. Resolution 127: " ... 'recommends' Israel suspends its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".
32. Resolution 138: Question relating to the case of Adolf Eichmann, concerning Argentine complaint that Israel breached its sovereignty.
33. Resolution 162: " ... 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".
34. Resolution 171: " ... determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".
35. Resolution 228: " ... 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".
36. Resolution 233 (June 6, 1967)
37. Resolution 234 (June 7, 1967)
38. Resolution 235 (June 9, 1967)
39. Resolution 236 (June 11, 1967)
40. Resolution 237: " ... 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees".
41. Resolution 240 (October 25, 1967): concerning violations of the cease-fire
42. Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967): Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area. Calls on Israel's neighbors to end the state of belligerency and calls upon Israel to reciprocate by withdraw its forces from land claimed by other parties in 1967 war. Interpreted commonly today as calling for the Land for peace principle as a way to resolve Arab-Israeli conflict
43. Resolution 248: " ... 'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".
44. Resolution 250: " ... 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
45. Resolution 251: " ... 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
46. Resolution 252: " ... 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
47. Resolution 256: " ... 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".
48. Resolution 258
49. Resolution 259: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".
50. Resolution 262: " ... 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport".
51. Resolution 265: " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on Salt, Jordan".
52. Resolution 267: " ... 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
53. Resolution 270: " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".
54. Resolution 271: " ... 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
55. Resolution 279: " ... 'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon".
56. Resolution 280: " ... 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon".
57. Resolution 285: " ... 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon".
58. Resolution 298: " ... 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
59. Resolution 313: " ... 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".
60. Resolution 316: " ... 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".
61. Resolution 317: " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".
62. Resolution 331
63. Resolution 332: " ... 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon".
64. Resolution 337: " ... 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty".
65. Resolution 338 (22 October 1973): cease fire in Yom Kippur War
66. Resolution 339 (23 October 1973): Confirms Res. 338, dispatch UN observers.
67. Resolution 340
68. Resolution 341
69. Resolution 344
70. Resolution 346
71. Resolution 347: " ... 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon".
72. Resolution 350 (31 May 1974) established the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, to monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Syria in the wake of the Yom Kippur War.
73. Resolution 362
74. Resolution 363
75. Resolution 368
76. Resolution 369
77. Resolution 371
78. Resolution 378
79. Resolution 381
80. Resolution 390
81. Resolution 396
82. Resolution 398
83. Resolution 408
84. Resolution 416
85. Resolution 420
86. Resolution 425 (1978): " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon". Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon was completed by 16 June 2000.
87. Resolution 426
88. Resolution 427: " ... 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon".
89. Resolution 429
90. Resolution 434
91. Resolution 438
92. Resolution 441
93. Resolution 444: " ... 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".
94. Resolution 446 (1979): 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
95. Resolution 449
96. Resolution 450: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".
97. Resolution 452: " ... 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".
98. Resolution 456
99. Resolution 459
100. Resolution 465: " ... 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program".
101. Resolution 467: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon".
102. Resolution 468: " ... 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".
103. Resolution 469: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians".
104. Resolution 470
105. Resolution 471: " ... 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
106. Resolution 474
107. Resolution 476: " ... 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
108. Resolution 478 (20 August 1980): 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'.
109. Resolution 481
110. Resolution 483
111. Resolution 484: " ... 'declares it imperative' that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors".
112. Resolution 485
113. Resolution 487: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility".
114. Resolution 488
115. Resolution 493
116. Resolution 497 (17 December 1981) decides that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.
117. Resolution 498: " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".
118. Resolution 501: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".
119. Resolution 506
120. Resolution 508:
121. Resolution 509: " ... 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".
122. Resolution 511
123. Resolution 515: " ... 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in".
124. Resolution 516
125. Resolution 517: " ... 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
126. Resolution 518: " ... 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".
127. Resolution 519
128. Resolution 520: " ... 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".
129. Resolution 523
130. Resolution 524
131. Resolution 529
132. Resolution 531
133. Resolution 536
134. Resolution 538
135. Resolution 543
136. Resolution 549
137. Resolution 551
138. Resolution 555
139. Resolution 557
140. Resolution 561
141. Resolution 563
142. Resolution 573: " ... 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.
143. Resolution 575
144. Resolution 576
145. Resolution 583
146. Resolution 584
147. Resolution 586
148. Resolution 587 " ... 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".
149. Resolution 590
150. Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".
151. Resolution 594
152. Resolution 596
153. Resolution 599
154. Resolution 603
155. Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
156. Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
157. Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
158. Resolution 609
159. Resolution 611
160. Resolution 613
161. Resolution 617
162. Resolution 624
163. Resolution 630
164. Resolution 633
165. Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
166. Resolution 639 (31 Jul 1989)
167. Resolution 641 (30 Aug 1989): " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
168. Resolution 645 (29 Nov 1989)
169. Resolution 648 (31 Jan 1990)[1] The Security Council extends the mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon until July 31, 1990.
170. Resolution 655 (31 May 1990)
171. Resolution 659 (31 Jul 1990)
172. Resolution 672 (12 Oct 1990): " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
173. Resolution 673 (24 Oct 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
174. Resolution 679 (30 Nov 1990)
175. Resolution 681 (20 Dec 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
176. Resolution 684 (30 Jan 1991)
177. Resolution 694 (24 May 1991): " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
178. Resolution 695 (30 May 1991)
179. Resolution 701 (31 Jul 1991)
180. Resolution 722 (29 Nov 1991)
181. Resolution 726 (06 Jan 1992): " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
182. Resolution 734 (29 Jan 1992)
183. Resolution 756 (29 May 1992)
184. Resolution 768 (30 Jul 1992)
185. Resolution 790 (25 Nov 1992)
186. Resolution 799 (18 Dec 1992): ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
187. Resolution 803 (28 Jan 1993)
188. Resolution 830 (26 May 1993)
189. Resolution 852 (28 Jul 1993)
190. Resolution 887 (29 Nov 1993)
191. Resolution 904 (18 Mar 1994)
192. Resolution 1039 (29 Jan 1996)
193. Resolution 1052 (18 Apr 1996)
194. Resolution 1057 (30 May 1996)
195. Resolution 1068 (30 Jul 1996)
196. Resolution 1073 (28 Sep 1996)
197. Resolution 1081 (27 Nov 1996)
198. Resolution 1095 (28 Jan 1997)
199. Resolution 1109 (28 May 1997)
200. Resolution 1122 (29 Jul 1997)
201. Resolution 1139 (21 Nov 1997)
202. Resolution 1151 (30 Jan 1998)
203. Resolution 1169 (27 May 1998)
204. Resolution 1188 (30 Jul 1998)
205. Resolution 1211 (25 Nov 1998)
206. Resolution 1223 (28 Jan 1999)
207. Resolution 1243 (27 May 1999)
208. Resolution 1254 (30 Jul 1999)
209. Resolution 1276 (24 Nov 1999)
210. Resolution 1288 (31 Jan 2000)
211. Resolution 1300 (31 May 2000)
212. Resolution 1310 (27 Jul 2000)
213. Resolution 1322 (07 Oct 2000)
214. Resolution 1328 (27 Nov 2000)
215. Resolution 1337 (30 Jan 2001)
216. Resolution 1351 (30 May 2001)
217. Resolution 1559 (2 September 2004) called upon Lebanon to establish its sovereignty over all of its land and called upon Syria to end their military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and to cease intervening in internal Lebanese politics. The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias to disband.
218. Resolution 1583 (28 January 2005) calls on Lebanon to assert full control over its border with Israel. It also states that "the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel's withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425.
219. Resolution 1648 (21 December 2005) renewed the mandate of United Nations Disengagement Observer Force until 30 June 2006.
220. Resolution 1701 (11 August 2006) called for the full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.
221. Resolution 1860 (9 January 2009) called for the full cessation of war between Israel and Hamas.

List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I would agree with your secound point though ¨

No country merits a nuke than Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Are you sure you didn't miss any?

 

[Marc39]

Iran is in violation of numerous UN resolutions and other regulations prohibiting the support of terrorism.

Care to post any?

Sure, moron: UN Res. 1368, 1373, 1566

And how does Israel stack up in violations of UN resolutions

Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions.
Iran is in violation of binding UN resolutions.

Now, you know, idiot.

 

[Jos]

Iran is in violation of numerous UN resolutions and other regulations prohibiting the support of terrorism.

Sure, moron: UN Res. 1368, 1373, 1566

And how does Israel stack up in violations of UN resolutions

Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions.
Iran is in violation of binding UN resolutions.

Now, you know, idiot.

1368 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1373 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1566 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

Now we all know

 

[Jos]

1559 http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2004/sc8181.doc.htm
which mentions israel by name many times eg. ¨Israel, by its policies of occupation and aggression, and its repression of the Palestinians, which constituted an undeniable threat to international peace and security¨

 

[JW Frogen]

Yes, the UN General Assembly is obsessed with denouncing Israel, they do a good job at that. Strange as Israel accepted the "UN" 1947 partition proposal and the Palestinians chose war. And Israel allowed those Palestinians who stayed in Israel to become citizens while every Jew was expelled from Palestinian controlled lands, and much of the Islamic world.

Still.

The UN can not denounce Sudan, or Russia in Georgia, not China in Tibet, or even the Robert Mugabe, but they can denounce Israel.

They can pull that off. Indeed we can rely on them for that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Yes, the UN General Assembly is obsessed with denouncing Israel, they do a good job at that. Strange as Israel accepted the "UN" 1947 partition proposal and the Palestinians chose war. And Israel allowed those Palestinians who stayed in Israel to become citizens while every Jew was expelled from Palestinian controlled lands, and much of the Islamic world.

Still.

The UN can not denounce Sudan, or Russia in Georgia, not China in Tibet, or even the Robert Mugabe, but they can denounce Israel.

They can pull that off. Indeed we can rely on them for that.

"Strange as Israel accepted the "UN" 1947 partition proposal and the Palestinians chose war."

Not true.

"... every Jew was expelled from Palestinian controlled lands,..."

Not true.

 

[JW Frogen]

Israel accepted the 1947 UN plan, the Arab world and Palestinians chose war, and defeat. Again, and again and...well you know, or should.

So regail me with tales of Jewish citizens of the Palestinian Authority or under Hamas controlled Gaza.

 

[Marc39]

Sure, moron: UN Res. 1368, 1373, 1566



Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions.
Iran is in violation of binding UN resolutions.

Now, you know, idiot.

1368 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1373 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1566 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

Now we all know

Fool, in supporting, funding and arming terrorist groups Hamas and Hizballah, which is well-documented, Iran is in violation of afore-mentioned UN Res. 1368, 1373 and 1566. The latter two resolutions are binding, placing Iran in violation of international law.

Additionally, Iran is in violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.

Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions nor of international law.

No one takes non-binding UN resolutions seriously and the plethora of anti-Israel resolutions are more a reflection of the Arab and Islamic bloc in the UN than real Israeli transgressions.

You're an amateur. My 10 year-old daughter is smarter.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel accepted the 1947 UN plan, the Arab world and Palestinians chose war, and defeat. Again, and again and...well you know, or should.

So regail me with tales of Jewish citizens of the Palestinian Authority or under Hamas controlled Gaza.

The 1947 UN plan defined borders for the Jewish state. Did Israel agree to those borders? It also stated that the rights of non Jews were to be protected. Did Israel agree to that?

If not, it did not accept the plan.

There are Jews, both citizens who have been there forever and foreign nationals, living in Palestine. They live there by choice i.e. they can go to Israel if they did not like it there.

 

[P F Tinmore]

1368 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1373 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

1566 No mention of Iran Or Israel
ODS HOME PAGE

Now we all know

Fool, in supporting, funding and arming terrorist groups Hamas and Hizballah, which is well-documented, Iran is in violation of afore-mentioned UN Res. 1368, 1373 and 1566. The latter two resolutions are binding, placing Iran in violation of international law.

Additionally, Iran is in violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.

Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions nor of international law.

No one takes non-binding UN resolutions seriously and the plethora of anti-Israel resolutions are more a reflection of the Arab and Islamic bloc in the UN than real Israeli transgressions.

You're an amateur. My 10 year-old daughter is smarter.

What is a terrorist group? Hamas is not a terrorist group in Palestine nor in Iran nor in many other place in the world. Hezbollah is a terrorist group in the US and Israel but not in the EU and most other places in the world.

Has this ever come up for vote in all the countries in the world?

 

[Marc39]

Fool, in supporting, funding and arming terrorist groups Hamas and Hizballah, which is well-documented, Iran is in violation of afore-mentioned UN Res. 1368, 1373 and 1566. The latter two resolutions are binding, placing Iran in violation of international law.

Additionally, Iran is in violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.

Israel is in violation of no binding UN resolutions nor of international law.

No one takes non-binding UN resolutions seriously and the plethora of anti-Israel resolutions are more a reflection of the Arab and Islamic bloc in the UN than real Israeli transgressions.

You're an amateur. My 10 year-old daughter is smarter.

What is a terrorist group? Hamas is not a terrorist group in Palestine nor in Iran nor in many other place in the world. Hezbollah is a terrorist group in the US and Israel but not in the EU and most other places in the world.

Has this ever come up for vote in all the countries in the world?

The dunce posts, again. Dunce, a terrorist group is one, as designated by the US State Department, that targets civilians, as Hamas routinely does against Israeli citizens.

Iran has been providing Hamas with both training, arms and financial support.

Israel does not deliberately target civilians. Prior to the Gaza war, the IDF blanketed Gaza with leaflets warning them of the impending military actions and even phoned and texted Gazans whose homes had been infiltrated by Hamas in order to minimize civilian casualties. This is unprecedented in the history of warfare.

Once, again, you prove to be an embarrassing dunce.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What is a terrorist group? Hamas is not a terrorist group in Palestine nor in Iran nor in many other place in the world. Hezbollah is a terrorist group in the US and Israel but not in the EU and most other places in the world.

Has this ever come up for vote in all the countries in the world?

The dunce posts, again. Dunce, a terrorist group is one, as designated by the US State Department, that targets civilians, as Hamas routinely does against Israeli citizens.

Iran has been providing Hamas with both training, arms and financial support.

Israel does not deliberately target civilians. Prior to the Gaza war, the IDF blanketed Gaza with leaflets warning them of the impending military actions and even phoned and texted Gazans whose homes had been infiltrated by Hamas in order to minimize civilian casualties. This is unprecedented in the history of warfare.

Once, again, you prove to be an embarrassing dunce.

Oh wow, the state department.

I am, impressed.

We will never find peace with third graders running our government.

BTW, where are the Gazans going to go when retards have all the borders closed.

 

[Marc39]

The dunce posts, again. Dunce, a terrorist group is one, as designated by the US State Department, that targets civilians, as Hamas routinely does against Israeli citizens.

Iran has been providing Hamas with both training, arms and financial support.

Israel does not deliberately target civilians. Prior to the Gaza war, the IDF blanketed Gaza with leaflets warning them of the impending military actions and even phoned and texted Gazans whose homes had been infiltrated by Hamas in order to minimize civilian casualties. This is unprecedented in the history of warfare.

Once, again, you prove to be an embarrassing dunce.

Oh wow, the state department.

I am, impressed.

We will never find peace with third graders running our government.

BTW, where are the Gazans going to go when retards have all the borders closed.

The forum dunce posts, again. Forum dunce, Hamas targets Israeli citizens, thus, defining them as terrorists.

Forum dunce, Gazans elected Hamas and provide safe haven to Hamas, making Gazans complicit in terrorism. That the IDF alerted Gazans of impending military action is unprecedented in military history.

Have a nice day, forum dunce. Everyone is laughing at you for being such an ignoramus.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Oh wow, the state department.

I am, impressed.

We will never find peace with third graders running our government.

BTW, where are the Gazans going to go when retards have all the borders closed.

The forum dunce posts, again. Forum dunce, Hamas targets Israeli citizens, thus, defining them as terrorists.

Forum dunce, Gazans elected Hamas and provide safe haven to Hamas, making Gazans complicit in terrorism. That the IDF alerted Gazans of impending military action is unprecedented in military history.

Have a nice day, forum dunce. Everyone is laughing at you for being such an ignoramus.

Gee, you call names almost as good as the third graders at the state department. Keep practicing. They may hire you.