AGW Question

[Martin Eden Mercury]

It's a yes or no question.

And here I was told you were one of the more intelligent members here: A loaded question or complex question fallacy?

It's neither. It's a simple question, no trick, no fallacy.

Does the AGW hypothesis suppose an atmospheric hot spot?

perhaps he doesn't know the supposed hypothesis. So marvin man, do you know the supposed hypothesis or not, yes or no. Watch out it's a trick question!!!!!LOL

Did you just confuse A loaded question or complex question fallacy with a trick question?

Why are you bringing down the level of conversation here?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

SSDD and the use of logical fallacy

Martin Eden Mercury trying to distract from the fact that he finds himself unable to answer a simple yes or no question with a simple yes or no.

A loaded question or complex question fallacy

Your doppelganger Crick has said that AGW supposes both a hot spot and a cooler spot. So it offers nothing in the way of a testable hypothesis and yet he linked to an article showing that AGW causes a Hot spot

Awesome theory that.

So far, no one, none of the AGWCultists have given us a straight answer to a simple question about their "theory"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Does Einstein theory of relativity suppose that gravity can bend light?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Does Einstein theory of relativity suppose that gravity can bend light?

Nothing escapes the liberal AGW nutter black hole...

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

SSDD and the use of logical fallacy

Martin Eden Mercury trying to distract from the fact that he finds himself unable to answer a simple yes or no question with a simple yes or no.

A loaded question or complex question fallacy

Your doppelganger Crick has said that AGW supposes both a hot spot and a cooler spot. So it offers nothing in the way of a testable hypothesis and yet he linked to an article showing that AGW causes a Hot spot

Awesome theory that.

So far, no one, none of the AGWCultists have given us a straight answer to a simple question about their "theory"

Is your Crick an expert on the theory? I mean, if he is right or wrong wrong, or mistaken in what he posts, will that mean the actually theory is right or wrong

So you admit you don't actually know what you are talking about?

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

Does Einstein theory of relativity suppose that gravity can bend light?

A search engine is your best friend.

 

[SSDD]

Does Einstein theory of relativity suppose that gravity can bend light?

A search engine is your best friend.

Because it is that easy to demonstrate the the predictive failure, and therefore the falsification of the AGW hypothesis. The hypothesis and the predictions based on it either came to pass or they did not...clearly, if you look at the literature, particularly the first assessment by the IPCC, an atmospheric hot spot was predicted and it was stated clearly that as CO2 increased so the hot spot would continue to warm. Modern warmist wackos claim that such a prediction was never made...along with quite a collection of other predictions that have also failed to materialize which warmers also claim were never made. The hypothesis, according to the scientific method has failed...its continued existence is maintained through politics and money...not scientific validity.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

SSDD and the use of logical fallacy

Martin Eden Mercury trying to distract from the fact that he finds himself unable to answer a simple yes or no question with a simple yes or no.

A loaded question or complex question fallacy

Your doppelganger Crick has said that AGW supposes both a hot spot and a cooler spot. So it offers nothing in the way of a testable hypothesis and yet he linked to an article showing that AGW causes a Hot spot

Awesome theory that.

So far, no one, none of the AGWCultists have given us a straight answer to a simple question about their "theory"

Is your Crick an expert on the theory? I mean, if he is right or wrong wrong, or mistaken in what he posts, will that mean the actually theory is right or wrong

So you admit you don't actually know what you are talking about?

Crick is a self-proclaimed expert on AGW

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Researchers have published results in Environmental Research Letters confirming strong warming in the upper troposphere, known colloquially as the tropospheric hotspot. The hot has been long expected as part of global warming theory and appears in many global climate models."

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-05-climate-scientists-elusive-tropospheric-hot.html#jCp

Apparently, the imaginary "hot spot" is part of AGWCult Theory

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

Does Einstein theory of relativity suppose that gravity can bend light?

A search engine is your best friend.

Because it is that easy to demonstrate the the predictive failure, and therefore the falsification of the AGW hypothesis. The hypothesis and the predictions based on it either came to pass or they did not...clearly, if you look at the literature, particularly the first assessment by the IPCC, an atmospheric hot spot was predicted and it was stated clearly that as CO2 increased so the hot spot would continue to warm. Modern warmist wackos claim that such a prediction was never made...along with quite a collection of other predictions that have also failed to materialize which warmers also claim were never made. The hypothesis, according to the scientific method has failed...its continued existence is maintained through politics and money...not scientific validity.

"AGW hypothesis?" I wonder when you will next claim "Gravity is only a hypothesis?"

You leave me with a difficult choice. Listen to a bunch of anonymous people on the world wide web, or listen to the scientific community. Tough choice

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

Crick is a self-proclaimed expert on AGW

As you are.

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

"Researchers have published results in Environmental Research Letters confirming strong warming in the upper troposphere, known colloquially as the tropospheric hotspot. The hot has been long expected as part of global warming theory and appears in many global climate models."

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-05-climate-scientists-elusive-tropospheric-hot.html#jCp

Apparently, the imaginary "hot spot" is part of AGWCult Theory

So what is your point?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Researchers have published results in Environmental Research Letters confirming strong warming in the upper troposphere, known colloquially as the tropospheric hotspot. The hot has been long expected as part of global warming theory and appears in many global climate models."

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-05-climate-scientists-elusive-tropospheric-hot.html#jCp

Apparently, the imaginary "hot spot" is part of AGWCult Theory

So what is your point?

It appears that current AGWcult theory does indeed suppose a tropospheric hotspot

 

[jc456]

SSDD and the use of logical fallacy

Martin Eden Mercury trying to distract from the fact that he finds himself unable to answer a simple yes or no question with a simple yes or no.

A loaded question or complex question fallacy

I didn't see any sour cream, bacon, or cheese on that question. So don't see how it was loaded.

Why would anyone ask a question they believe there is a simple answer to?

as a benchmark for a discussion? Maybe, understanding a persons position is important in a discussion. Guess you don't have them very often.

It'd be similar to discussion favorite teams in sports or favorite sport. Helps to know what to talk about.

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

It appears that current AGWcult theory does indeed suppose a tropospheric hotspot

Have you seen any news reports on how one has been found to exist?

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

as a benchmark for a discussion? Maybe, understanding a persons position is important in a discussion. Guess you don't have them very often.

It'd be similar to discussion favorite teams in sports or favorite sport. Helps to know what to talk about.

So you feel the need to ask a question, or you feel the need to set up a yes or no question? Have you ever been in a court of law? Yes or no?

 

[jc456]

as a benchmark for a discussion? Maybe, understanding a persons position is important in a discussion. Guess you don't have them very often.

It'd be similar to discussion favorite teams in sports or favorite sport. Helps to know what to talk about.

So you feel the need to ask a question, or you feel the need to set up a yes or no question? Have you ever been in a court of law? Yes or no?

yes I have been in a court of law. What's that got to do with answering a question regarding the origin of a theory? Fk the question and lay out what the theory is developed from?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It appears that current AGWcult theory does indeed suppose a tropospheric hotspot

Have you seen any news reports on how one has been found to exist?

It's AGW, who can really say what "exists" The theory changes with the weather

 

[jc456]

as a benchmark for a discussion? Maybe, understanding a persons position is important in a discussion. Guess you don't have them very often.

It'd be similar to discussion favorite teams in sports or favorite sport. Helps to know what to talk about.

So you feel the need to ask a question, or you feel the need to set up a yes or no question? Have you ever been in a court of law? Yes or no?

so what you're really saying is that you don't want to be tied to an answer so that you can change your mind when it is appropriate, when you know the lie is exposed. Got ya!!!

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

as a benchmark for a discussion? Maybe, understanding a persons position is important in a discussion. Guess you don't have them very often.

It'd be similar to discussion favorite teams in sports or favorite sport. Helps to know what to talk about.

So you feel the need to ask a question, or you feel the need to set up a yes or no question? Have you ever been in a court of law? Yes or no?

yes I have been in a court of law. What's that got to do with answering a question regarding the origin of a theory? Fk the question and lay out what the theory is developed from?

a benchmark for a discussion: Why do you put people on trial with yes or no questions? When discussing a theory, one of your allies has called a hypothesis, it is not unrealistic to assume that you are not looking to discuss a theory, so much as you are looking to attack the persons.