AFD Alternative for Germany - The best party for Germans

[Bleipriester]

As long as you comply with establishment, your small party is welcome. But if you touch non-topics like immigration, you´re out. And yes, they might disappear quick like the Pirates. The large parties occupy their positions for a while and then drop them. But you aren´t in Germany, you don´t know how the AfD is treated. There will be no coalition with the CDU, its excluded. Maybe, the AfD is already the system´s controlled wrath outlet valve. This at least would explain why the AfD is somewhat accepted in the media.

Where? Where is this the case? Not in Germany, not in the UK.

In the US parties don't even get near.

How do you know I'm not in Germany? You don't. So....

But everything you have said has been backed up by nothing. I think you're just making this stuff up.

You don't seem to understand German history from 1945 onwards to understand the German mentality.

The "anti-democrats, misanthropes, right-wing extremists, and idiots of the AfD" (according to established parties) are excluded.

Bundestagswahl: Merkel schließt Koalition mit AfD aus

However, it is certain they exclude a coalition with the established parties as well.

Excluding the AfD from coalition is different to excluding them from having a voice.

They cannot exclude it from having a voice and there are calls for a ban on a regular basis.

Yes, maybe there are calls for a ban, but then it probably won't happen. So.... there are calls for a ban on the Democrats in the US by some people, doesn't mean it'll happen.

Not the same and you know it.

 

[Bleipriester]

Yup, imprisonment can be quite isolating.

When people demand on facebook that refugees should be murdered with hammers ect ect, this is not covered by freedom of speech.

In Germany even if folks demand to lower import of Muslims they can be imprison for 'hate crime', 'racism' and 'Nazism'.
E.g. Mr. Sturzenberger:

Or killed ( beaten ) by Antifa ( no investigations by so-called 'police' )

Any critic of Islam is a Hate Speech in DDR 2.0
Six months prison for criticizing of Islam.

Sechs Monate Haft für PI-NEWS Autor Michael Stürzenberger

https://www.journalistenwatch.com/2...ft-fuer-pi-news-autor-michael-stuerzenberger/

The True Purpose of the United Socialists CDU-CSU-SPD-FDP-Lefts-Greens is completely replacement of indigenous Germans by IQ60 illiterate African Muslims ( at best criminal, with no education, high religious, owners of four wives and twenty IQ60 inbreeding children, coming customers of welfare offices and voters for the United Socialists CDU-CSU-SPD-FDP-Lefts-Greens)

The problem is he seems to end up in court quite a lot

You are being redirected...

Michael Stürzenberger Acquitted in Munich

From May 2013.


The first problem is that showing the swastika in Germany is illegal. You can say this takes away freedom of speech, but then again freedom of speech has limits, and Germany is trying to deal with its Nazi past in a way the US won't. When you have a country that has been through something like that, you want to protect your country from going through it again, and the US isn't against doing things that could be seen as taking away people's rights in order to protect the country.

You are misinformed. "Showing the swastika" is not per se illegal. If you have a historic photo and there is a swastika on it you can put it in your article. Generally, for documentary purposes, you don´t need to remove symbols.

No, I'm not informed at all.

Strafgesetzbuch section 86a - Wikipedia

Here's the law.

"
1) Whoever domestically disseminates or produces, stocks, imports or exports or makes publicly accessible through data storage media for dissemination domestically or abroad, means of propaganda:
1. of a party which has been declared to be unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court or a party or organization, as to which it has been determined, no longer subject to appeal, that it is a substitute organization of such a party;

[…]

4. means of propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further the aims of a former National Socialist organization,
shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine. […]

(3) Subsection (1) shall not be applicable if the means of propaganda or the act serves to further civil enlightenment, to avert unconstitutional aims, to promote art or science, research or teaching, reporting about current historical events or similar purposes. […]

And I'm thinking they got this guy based on this.

What does it have to do with the photo?